From Many to Meaningful: Feature-Guided Zero-Shot Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12260v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:00:58 GMT
• Title: From Many to Meaningful: Feature-Guided Zero-Shot Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Using Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: This study examines the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for early-stage CKD screening in a zero-shot setting.<n>We propose a feature-guided framework that evaluates LLM performance using a selected set of clinically meaningful, readily available community-based features.<n>Generalizability was assessed across three heterogeneous CKD datasets spanning three countries.
• Score: 0.5442955439283729
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Early screening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is essential for preventing irreversible progression; however, many machine learning (ML)-based screening methods remain difficult to deploy in community and resource-limited screening settings due to their reliance on large labeled datasets, resource-intensive pathology tests, or high-dimensional clinical features, and limited robustness to population and distributional shifts. This study examines the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for early-stage CKD screening in a zero-shot setting, without dataset-specific training. We propose a feature-guided zero-shot framework that evaluates LLM performance using a selected set of clinically meaningful, readily available community-based features, rather than exhaustive clinical inputs. Feature selection was guided by ML-based analysis to identify a compact, clinically relevant subset of variables. Tabular patient records were subsequently serialized into text using standardized prompt templates to enable zero-shot inference. The zero-shot performance of four LLMs (LLaMA-3, Qwen-3, Mistral, and GPT-4o-mini) was evaluated using both the full feature set and the selected subset. Generalizability was assessed across three heterogeneous CKD datasets spanning three countries. Across models and datasets, the selected feature set yielded consistent and statistically significant improvements in balanced accuracy and probability estimates, achieving performance levels suitable for screening purposes. These findings suggest that LLMs can support clinically meaningful, training-free CKD screening using minimal community-accessible patient features, offering a practical complement to conventional ML methods in real-world screening contexts.

Related papers

• LLM4CKD: Large Language Models for Early Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Screening [0.5442955439283729]
  Early screening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is critical for timely intervention.<n>Most machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches require labeled data and model training.<n>This study evaluates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) for CKD screening under zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T15:53:20Z)
• Revisiting LLM Adaptation for 3D CT Report Generation: A Study of Scaling and Diagnostic Priors [10.853232316677362]
  Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong adaptability to natural images.<n> RAD3D-Prefix is a framework that minimizes the need for extensive parameter training.<n>Our method requires minimal trainable parameters and mitigates the risk of overfitting on small, domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T18:51:31Z)
• Domain-Adapted Small Language Models for Reliable Clinical Triage [4.836986736624673]
  This study evaluates whether open-source small language models (SLMs) can serve as reliable, privacy-preserving decision-support tools for clinical triage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T15:00:09Z)
• LLMs for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction from Structured Clinical Data [0.0]
  Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of death globally.<n>We develop a hybrid framework that bridges structured clinical data and natural-language representations for CAD prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T00:16:05Z)
• PREBA: Surgical Duration Prediction via PCA-Weighted Retrieval-Augmented LLMs and Bayesian Averaging Aggregation [51.96735866702332]
  PREBA is a retrieval-augmented framework that integrates PCA-weighted retrieval and Bayesian averaging aggregation.<n> PREBA significantly improves performance-for instance, reducing MAE by up to 40% and raising R2 from -0.13 to 0.62 over zero-shot inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T07:19:23Z)
• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• Conformal Lesion Segmentation for 3D Medical Images [82.92159832699583]
  We propose a risk-constrained framework that calibrates data-driven thresholds via conformalization to ensure the test-time FNR remains below a target tolerance.<n>We validate the statistical soundness and predictive performance of CLS on six 3D-LS datasets across five backbone models, and conclude with actionable insights for deploying risk-aware segmentation in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T08:21:00Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Clinical Prediction with Structured Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Data [7.815738943706123]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally tailored for natural language processing. This research investigates the adaptability of LLMs, like GPT-4, to EHR data. In response to the longitudinal, sparse, and knowledge-infused nature of EHR data, our prompting approach involves taking into account specific characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T20:14:50Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.