Next-Billion AI Index: The compass for AI utility and adoption in the global majority

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00359v1
• Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 21:01:42 GMT
• Title: Next-Billion AI Index: The compass for AI utility and adoption in the global majority
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Next Billion AI Index (nexbax)<n>It is the first diagnostic framework to treat economic viability, operational deployability, and governance alignment as co-equal determinants of AI utility.<n>We conduct a formative expert evaluation through eleven semi-structured interviews with founders, developers, product leaders, and technical practitioners building AI systems for next-billion markets.
• Score: 24.520947240933477
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI assessments remain dominated by frontier capability benchmarks that often fail to capture whether systems can be sustainably deployed, adapted, and trusted in locally grounded and infrastructure-constrained settings. This paper introduces the Next Billion AI Index (nexbax), which we believe is the first diagnostic framework to treat economic viability, operational deployability, and governance alignment as co-equal determinants of AI utility in next-billion-user contexts. Rather than treating usefulness as a single outcome, nexbax operationalizes the preconditions for useful AI through 10 dimensions organized under three themes: Effective Efficiency, Operational Practicality, and Societal Integrity. These dimensions assess whether systems are economically viable, deployable under infrastructure and workflow constraints, and aligned with local needs, user expectations, and collaborative development practices. We pair the framework with rubrics for weak, moderate, and strong performance, and conduct a formative expert evaluation through eleven semi-structured interviews with founders, developers, product leaders, and technical practitioners building AI systems for next-billion markets. Participants found the index useful for reasoning about adoption trade-offs and effective at capturing factors shaping real-world AI uptake -- particularly cost, usability, reliability, and trust. They also identified the need for contextual explanations, domain-specific evidence, and broader stakeholder validation. Nexbax is therefore proposed not as a universal score of social value, but as a diagnostic for artificial useful intelligence: a way to make visible the technical, economic, and governance properties that make inclusive AI deployment more viable.

Related papers

• Optimising for Flourishing: Flourishing Metrics and Return on Flourishing as Success Criteria for Artificial Intelligence and Post-AGI Economic Systems [0.0]
  We argue that human flourishing should serve as a primary success criterion for artificial intelligence.<n>First, Flourishing Metrics provides a framework spanning physical, emotional, financial, relational, spiritual, and planetary well-being.<n>Second, Return on Flourishing (RoF) extends return on investment by evaluating the counterfactual contribution of interventions, policies, and AI systems to flourishing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T17:00:47Z)
• Beyond Model Readiness: Institutional Readiness for AI Deployment in Public Systems [0.0]
  Many public-sector artificial intelligence systems fail not at the point of model development, but at the point of deployment.<n>Existing responsible AI and model evaluation frameworks are valuable, but they primarily assess models, datasets, and developer-side processes.<n>We introduce Institutional Alignment Readiness (IAR), a five-dimensional framework for assessing deployment readiness in public systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T00:11:09Z)
• Towards Outcome-Oriented, Task-Agnostic Evaluation of AI Agents [1.0305173936249623]
  This white paper proposes a novel framework of eleven outcome-based, task-agnostic performance metrics for AI agents.<n>We introduce metrics such as Goal Completion Rate (GCR), Autonomy Index (AIx), Multi-Step Task Resilience (MTR), and Business Impact Efficiency (BIE)<n>Our results reveal significant performance trade-offs between different agent designs, highlighting the Hybrid Agent as the most consistently high-performing model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T13:40:46Z)
• Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents [63.03252293761656]
  This paper systematically reviews the technologies, applications, and evaluation methods of industry agents based on large language models (LLMs)<n>We examine the three key technological pillars that support the advancement of agent capabilities: Memory, Planning, and Tool Use.<n>We provide an overview of the application of industry agents in real-world domains such as digital engineering, scientific discovery, embodied intelligence, collaborative business execution, and complex system simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T12:46:55Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications [0.0]
  This paper introduces a framework ensuring that AI must be ethical, controllable, viable, and desirable.<n>Different case studies validate this framework by integrating AI in both academic and practical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T12:39:28Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Multisource AI Scorecard Table for System Evaluation [3.74397577716445]
  The paper describes a Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST) that provides the developer and user of an artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) system with a standard checklist. The paper explores how the analytic tradecraft standards outlined in Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 203 can provide a framework for assessing the performance of an AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T03:37:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.