"I Strongly Suspect This Website Is a Scam": Benchmarking PII Leakage and Detection without Defense in Autonomous Web Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00497v1
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 03:00:28 GMT
- Title: "I Strongly Suspect This Website Is a Scam": Benchmarking PII Leakage and Detection without Defense in Autonomous Web Agents
- Abstract summary: Social-engineering attacks are highly effective at extracting critical-tier PII from frontier web agents.<n>Across frontier agents, we find that critical-tier PII leakage reaches 54--93% under no privacy guidance.<n>Our findings reveal that defenses conditioned on the agent's own recognition of an attack are gating on the wrong signal.
- Score: 7.499940157426921
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Deceptive web content, widely instantiated across the internet and commonly known as \textit{social-engineering attacks}, manipulates autonomous web agents into submitting users' personally identifiable information (PII) to attacker-controlled endpoints. In this paper, we show that social-engineering attacks are highly effective at extracting critical-tier PII from frontier web agents, posing a severe risk to deployed agentic systems. To quantify this risk, we introduce \textbf{\textsc{Scammer4U}}, a pre-registered benchmark of 91 attacker-controlled environments and 10 benign-twin baselines, spanning 8 attack vectors and 16 site categories on an 8-axis factorial taxonomy that isolates the causal contribution of individual attack design factors. Across frontier agents, we find that critical-tier PII leakage reaches 54--93\% under no privacy guidance, compared to 0\% on benign-twin baselines, confirming that leakage is attack-attributable rather than incidental form-filling. Escalating prompt-level mitigation yields sharply model-dependent reductions across the four families and remains insufficient to reliably prevent critical PII submission at the pooled level. Most critically, we identify a detection--action gap: agents whose reasoning an independent LLM judge confirms has flagged the site as suspicious still submit critical PII in 35.9\% of sessions, versus 66.1\% when no suspicion is verbalized, a 30.2\% gap robust across all four model families. Our findings reveal that defenses conditioned on the agent's own recognition of an attack are gating on the wrong signal, motivating output-level interception of outbound submissions that operates independently of the agent's reasoning loop.
Related papers
- SingGuard-NSFA: Extensible Guardrails for Agentic AI via Generative Reasoning and Real-Time Classification [0.0]
nsfaguard is a guardrail framework for securing agentic AI systems against operational threats.<n>We first introduce the NSFA taxonomy, which organizes 185 risk variants into a CIA-triad-grounded hierarchy.<n>We develop a dual-mode approach combining SFT-based generative reasoning for interpretable offline auditing with discriminative classification heads on the frozen backbone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-13T07:28:45Z) - Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents [0.0]
Recent work has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection.<n>We organize these out-of-band defenses as instances of classical integrity protection.<n>We run that protocol as an independent reproduction and extension of Progent's own adaptive-attack analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T00:35:23Z) - Steering LLM Viewpoints through Fabricated Evidence Injection [61.22850755490993]
We introduce a two-phase attack framework that first repackages misleading statements with fabricated rationales, then instruct target LLMs to incorporate these viewpoints when responding to relevant queries.<n>Experiments on BBQ, ToxiGen, and our specialized dataset reveal that commercial LLMs without external safety classifiers remain highly vulnerable.<n>Building on this, we explore multiple defense strategies, among which a tailored safety policy enablesgpt-oss-safeguard to achieve 81% detection rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T14:48:23Z) - Plant, Persist, Trigger: Sleeper Attack on Large Language Model Agents [64.80318459073526]
We show that adversarial content can persist across interactions served by the same agent, making such threats harder to detect and mitigate.<n>Specifically, adversarial content may persist in the agent state, remain dormant across interactions, and later be activated by a benign user query.<n>We formalize this type of safety threat as Sleeper Attack. To evaluate it, we construct a benchmark with 1,896 instances covering six real-world harmful outcomes, three attack strategies, and three agent state targets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T09:25:37Z) - How Vulnerable Are AI Agents to Indirect Prompt Injections? Insights from a Large-Scale Public Competition [48.32744727426218]
LLM based agents are increasingly deployed in high stakes settings where they process external data sources such as emails, documents, and code repositories.<n>This creates exposure to indirect prompt injection attacks, where adversarial instructions embedded in external content manipulate agent behavior without user awareness.<n>We present findings from a large scale public red teaming competition evaluating this dual objective across three agent settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T14:49:36Z) - Intentional Deception as Controllable Capability in LLM Agents [0.0]
We present a systematic study of intentional deception as an engineered capability in multi-agent systems.<n>We investigate a two-stage system that infers target agent characteristics and generates deceptive responses steering targets toward actions counter to their beliefs and motivations.<n>We find that deceptive intervention produces differential effects concentrated in specific behavioral profiles rather than distributed uniformly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-08T23:48:49Z) - Securing AI Agents Against Prompt Injection Attacks [0.0]
We present a benchmark for evaluating prompt injection risks in RAG-enabled AI agents.<n>Our framework reduces successful attack rates from 73.2% to 8.7% while maintaining 94.3% of baseline task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-19T10:00:54Z) - VulAgent: Hypothesis-Validation based Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection [55.957275374847484]
VulAgent is a multi-agent vulnerability detection framework based on hypothesis validation.<n>It implements a semantics-sensitive, multi-view detection pipeline, each aligned to a specific analysis perspective.<n>On average, VulAgent improves overall accuracy by 6.6%, increases the correct identification rate of vulnerable--fixed code pairs by up to 450%, and reduces the false positive rate by about 36%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-15T02:25:38Z) - WebGuard: Building a Generalizable Guardrail for Web Agents [59.31116061613742]
WebGuard is the first dataset designed to support the assessment of web agent action risks.<n>It contains 4,939 human-annotated actions from 193 websites across 22 diverse domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-18T18:06:27Z) - The Dark Side of LLMs: Agent-based Attacks for Complete Computer Takeover [0.0]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents and multi-agent systems introduce security vulnerabilities that extend beyond traditional content generation to system-level compromises.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the LLMs security used as reasoning engines within autonomous agents.<n>We show how different attack surfaces and trust boundaries can be leveraged to orchestrate such takeovers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-09T13:54:58Z) - Malicious Agent Detection for Robust Multi-Agent Collaborative Perception [52.261231738242266]
Multi-agent collaborative (MAC) perception is more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than single-agent perception.
We propose Malicious Agent Detection (MADE), a reactive defense specific to MAC perception.
We conduct comprehensive evaluations on a benchmark 3D dataset V2X-sim and a real-road dataset DAIR-V2X.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T11:36:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.