The Invitation Trap: Proactive Availability Backdoor in LLMs via Conversational Induction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00654v1
• Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 09:57:42 GMT
• Title: The Invitation Trap: Proactive Availability Backdoor in LLMs via Conversational Induction
• Abstract summary: We introduce the textbfProactive Availability Backdoor (PAB), a novel paradigm that shifts the attack vector from passive waiting to active social engineering.<n>By weaponizing the inherent helpfulness of aligned LLMs, PAB proactively traps users into executing trigger-implanted queries.
• Score: 17.83941673460122
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current backdoor attacks against LLMs are typically manipulated by the attacker and remain passive. In this paper, we introduce the \textbf{Proactive Availability Backdoor (PAB)}, a novel paradigm that shifts the attack vector from passive waiting to active social engineering. By weaponizing the inherent helpfulness of aligned LLMs, PAB proactively traps users into executing trigger-implanted queries by offering suggestions, achieving high aggressiveness, precision and stealthiness. To rigorously evaluate its threat in a real-life context, we introduce a dual-agent ecological simulation framework based on selected dimensions of the Five-Factor Model, and deploy PAB with few-shot prompts. Being validated on different models and domains, PAB performs remarkably and its effective attack success rate, which calculates the joint probability of attack incidence rate and attack success rate, goes to \textbf{73.1\%}. We also introduce \textbf{Anti-PAB}, a defense method tailored for PAB. Our findings reveal that the helpfulness of LLMs can be weaponized to compromise availability, exposing a serious hidden threat to LLMs users. We release all the scripts and datasets in the experiments at \texttt{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PAB-ANONYMOUS/}.

Related papers

• Sleeper Cell: Injecting Latent Malice Temporal Backdoors into Tool-Using LLMs [0.0]
  Openweight Large Language Models (LLMs) have democratized agentic AI, yet finetuned weights are frequently shared and adopted with limited scrutiny beyond leaderboard performance.<n>This creates a risk where third-party models are incorporated without strong behavioral guarantees.<n>We show that poisoned models maintain state-of-the-art performance on benign tasks, incentivizing their adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T22:01:08Z)
• MAGIC: A Co-Evolving Attacker-Defender Adversarial Game for Robust LLM Safety [28.246225272659917]
  This paper introduces textbfMAGIC, a novel multi-turn multi-agent reinforcement learning framework.<n>It formulates Large Language Models safety alignment as an adversarial asymmetric game.<n>Our framework demonstrates superior defense success rates without compromising the helpfulness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T02:12:28Z)
• Friend or Foe: How LLMs' Safety Mind Gets Fooled by Intent Shift Attack [53.34204977366491]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks despite their impressive capabilities.<n>In this paper, we introduce ISA (Intent Shift Attack), which obfuscates LLMs about the intent of the attacks.<n>Our approach only needs minimal edits to the original request, and yields natural, human-readable, and seemingly harmless prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T13:44:42Z)
• P2P: A Poison-to-Poison Remedy for Reliable Backdoor Defense in LLMs [49.908234151374785]
  During fine-tuning, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to data-poisoning backdoor attacks.<n>We propose Poison-to-Poison (P2P), a general and effective backdoor defense algorithm.<n>We show that P2P can neutralize malicious backdoors while preserving task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T05:45:23Z)
• Probe before You Talk: Towards Black-box Defense against Backdoor Unalignment for Large Language Models [17.839413035304748]
  Backdoor unalignment attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs) enable the stealthy compromise of safety alignment using a hidden trigger.<n>We introduce BEAT, a black-box defense that detects triggered samples during inference to deactivate the backdoored LLM.<n>Our method addresses the challenges of sample-dependent targets from an opposite perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T16:30:56Z)
• Revisiting Backdoor Attacks on LLMs: A Stealthy and Practical Poisoning Framework via Harmless Inputs [54.90315421117162]
  We propose a novel poisoning method via completely harmless data.<n>Inspired by the causal reasoning in auto-regressive LLMs, we aim to establish robust associations between triggers and an affirmative response prefix.<n>We observe an interesting resistance phenomenon where the LLM initially appears to agree but subsequently refuses to answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z)
• CheatAgent: Attacking LLM-Empowered Recommender Systems via LLM Agent [32.958798200220286]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-empowered recommender systems (RecSys) have brought significant advances in personalized user experience.<n>We propose a novel attack framework called CheatAgent by harnessing the human-like capabilities of LLMs.<n>Our method first identifies the insertion position for maximum impact with minimal input modification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T05:31:37Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• Defending Large Language Models Against Attacks With Residual Stream Activation Analysis [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial threats.<n>This paper presents an innovative defensive strategy, given white box access to an LLM.<n>We apply a novel methodology for analyzing distinctive activation patterns in the residual streams for attack prompt classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:06:33Z)
• ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings [58.82536530615557]
  We propose an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF) to transform continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text. Our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T06:46:27Z)
• BadCLIP: Dual-Embedding Guided Backdoor Attack on Multimodal Contrastive Learning [85.2564206440109]
  This paper reveals the threats in this practical scenario that backdoor attacks can remain effective even after defenses. We introduce the emphtoolns attack, which is resistant to backdoor detection and model fine-tuning defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T02:21:49Z)
• Trojan Activation Attack: Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment [31.24530091590395]
  We study an attack scenario called Trojan Activation Attack (TA2), which injects trojan steering vectors into the activation layers of Large Language Models. Our experiment results show that TA2 is highly effective and adds little or no overhead to attack efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T23:07:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.