Regularized Offline Policy Optimization with Posterior Hybrid Bayesian Belief

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00680v2
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:18:05 GMT
• Title: Regularized Offline Policy Optimization with Posterior Hybrid Bayesian Belief
• Abstract summary: We propose Posterior Hybrid Bayesian Belief, which reformulates the expectation as a convex combination over a subset of dynamics models.<n>We develop an iterative regularized policy optimization algorithm that provides metric-agnostic guarantees for monotonic improvement until convergence.
• Score: 14.44966497240221
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to optimize policies from pre-collected datasets. A bottleneck of this paradigm is managing epistemic uncertainty, which arises from limited data coverage (sample-level) and the ambiguity in identifying transition dynamics from finite data (model-level). To provide a unified quantification of these uncertainties, Bayesian RL has been proposed by treating the dynamics model as a random variable and maintaining a corresponding belief. Despite its theoretical appeal, policy optimization in Bayesian RL remains computationally challenging as it requires solving composite objectives with expectations. Prior methods either employ search-based techniques with poor computational scalability or impose restrictive posterior assumptions that sacrifice the adaptability of Bayesian RL. To address these limitations, we propose Posterior Hybrid Bayesian Belief (PhyB), which reformulates the expectation as a convex combination over a subset of dynamics models. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the objective discrepancy induced by this approximation remains bounded. Based on PhyB, we develop an iterative regularized policy optimization algorithm that provides metric-agnostic guarantees for monotonic improvement until convergence. Empirical results demonstrate that PhyB achieves state-of-the-art performance on various benchmarks.

Related papers

• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Non-Parametric Rehearsal Learning via Conditional Mean Embeddings [88.89267783967263]
  We propose a non-parametric rehearsal learning approach for textitavoiding undesired future (AUF) problems.<n>Specifically, we use kernel machinery to reformulate the AUF objective into a unified representation that disentangles desirability modeling from action-induced distributional changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:30:52Z)
• Offline Policy Optimization with Posterior Sampling [18.74544103863437]
  A fundamental challenge in model-based offline reinforcement learning (RL) lies in the trade-off between generalization and robustness.<n>We propose Posterior Sampling-based Policy Optimization (PSPO), which formulates dynamics modeling as a Bayesian inference process.<n> Experiments on standard benchmarks validate PSPO achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T07:48:21Z)
• Possibilistic Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Learning [75.00607359322863]
  We introduce Dirichlet-approximated possibilistic posterior predictions (DAPPr)<n>DAPPr is a principled framework leveraging possibility theory.<n>This projection-and-approximation strategy yields a simple training objective with closed-form solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T12:14:01Z)
• Multi-Objective Reward and Preference Optimization: Theory and Algorithms [3.316593788543852]
  This thesis develops theoretical frameworks and algorithms that advance constrained reinforcement learning (RL) across control, preference learning, and alignment of large language models.<n>ACPO, e-COP, warmPref-PS, PSPL, and MOPO advance RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms.<n> Collectively, the thesis unifies RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms, delivering theoretical advances and practical tools for safe and aligned decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T12:51:21Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
  We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values. We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z)
• Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics Belief [3.0036519884678894]
  Model-based offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to find highly rewarding policy, by leveraging a previously collected static dataset and a dynamics model. In this work, we maintain a belief distribution over dynamics, and evaluate/optimize policy through biased sampling from the belief. We show that the biased sampling naturally induces an updated dynamics belief with policy-dependent reweighting factor, termed Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics Belief.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T03:14:36Z)
• False Correlation Reduction for Offline Reinforcement Learning [115.11954432080749]
  We propose falSe COrrelation REduction (SCORE) for offline RL, a practically effective and theoretically provable algorithm. We empirically show that SCORE achieves the SoTA performance with 3.1x acceleration on various tasks in a standard benchmark (D4RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:34:03Z)
• DROMO: Distributionally Robust Offline Model-based Policy Optimization [0.0]
  We consider the problem of offline reinforcement learning with model-based control. We propose distributionally robust offline model-based policy optimization (DROMO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T13:25:14Z)
• Safe Continuous Control with Constrained Model-Based Policy Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce a model-based safe exploration algorithm for constrained high-dimensional control. We also introduce a practical algorithm that accelerates policy search with model-generated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T15:20:55Z)
• COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization [120.55713363569845]
  Uncertainty estimation with complex models, such as deep neural networks, can be difficult and unreliable. We develop a new model-based offline RL algorithm, COMBO, that regularizes the value function on out-of-support state-actions. We find that COMBO consistently performs as well or better as compared to prior offline model-free and model-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T18:50:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.