IDEAFix: Evaluation Framework for Creative Defixation Prompting in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00875v1
• Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 20:15:01 GMT
• Title: IDEAFix: Evaluation Framework for Creative Defixation Prompting in LLMs
• Abstract summary: We introduce IDEAFix, an evaluation framework for analyzing divergent thinking in open-ended idea generation tasks.<n>We prompt models to generate multiple original solutions to controlled variations of short design scenarios, task attributes, and defixation prompting strategies.<n>Our results show that both task formulation and attribute selection significantly affect models' performance, and that simple prompting strategies can boost the originality of solutions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for tasks involving creative problem solving and idea generation. However, there is a lack of consensus concerning their creative capabilities: some studies report superior performances compared to humans, while others highlight structural limitations such as fixation and the homogenization of outputs. Existing evaluation approaches either rely on narrow, decontextualized tasks that do not capture goal-oriented generation or on broader settings that confound multiple aspects of the creative process, making it difficult to isolate the effects of task formulation, prompting, and evaluation design. Significantly, the role of structured prompting strategies in shaping idea generation remains underexplored. Therefore, we introduce IDEAFix, an evaluation framework for analyzing divergent thinking in open-ended idea generation tasks. We prompt models to generate multiple original solutions to controlled variations of short design scenarios, task attributes, and defixation prompting strategies. This design enables systematic analysis of how structured guidance influences LLMs' idea generation. Our results show that both task formulation and attribute selection significantly affect models' performance, and that simple prompting strategies can boost the originality of solutions. However, we also observe persistent output homogenization across models, confirming inherent limits in their ability to generate diverse solutions. Overall, IDEAFix provides a controlled, extensible framework for studying the mechanisms underlying LLMs' creativity.

Related papers

• FormuEvo: LLM-Guided Evolution for Discovering Solver-Efficient Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations [66.32852384262038]
  Mixed-integer programming (MIP) lies at the core of operations research and industrial optimization.<n>We propose FormuEvo, an evolutionary framework for automated discovery of solver-efficient MIP formulations.<n>FormuEvo frames MIP formulation design as evolutionary optimization over the symbolic space of MIP formulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T15:01:28Z)
• Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended Tasks [3.6948012022450776]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in language understanding, reasoning, and generation.<n>We introduce an automated, domain-agnostic framework for quantifying LLM creativity across open-ended tasks.<n>Our approach separates the measurement apparatus from the creative task itself, enabling scalable, task-agnostic assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T07:37:06Z)
• Synergizing Understanding and Generation with Interleaved Analyzing-Drafting Thinking [154.2388970262703]
  Unified Vision-Language Models (UVLMs) aim to advance multimodal learning by supporting both understanding and generation within a single framework.<n>We introduce the interleaved Analyzing-Drafting problem-solving loop (AD-Loop), a new think paradigm that alternates between analytic and drafting operations.<n>By interleaving textual thoughts with visual thoughts, AD-Loop enables models to iteratively refine both comprehension and outputs, fostering genuine synergy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T23:26:09Z)
• DPWriter: Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Planning Branching for Creative Writing [78.70918589095639]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based enhancement of large language models (LLMs) often leads to reduced output diversity.<n>This paper proposes an RL framework structured around a semi-structured long Chain-of-Thought (CoT)<n>We introduce a Diverse Planning Branching method that strategically introduces divergence at the planning phase based on diversity variation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T16:30:20Z)
• Integrating Diverse Assignment Strategies into DETRs [61.61489761918158]
  Label assignment is a critical component in object detectors, particularly within DETR-style frameworks.<n>We propose LoRA-DETR, a flexible and lightweight framework that seamlessly integrates diverse assignment strategies into any DETR-style detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T07:28:54Z)
• Who Sees What? Structured Thought-Action Sequences for Epistemic Reasoning in LLMs [1.090218572228214]
  This study investigates the potential of structured examples to improve the performance of LLM-based agents within a ReAct framework.<n>We propose a structured solution-processing pipeline that generates three categories of examples: optimal goal paths (G-type), informative node paths (E-type) and step-by-step optimal decision sequences contrasting alternative actions (L-type)<n>While L-type examples slightly reduce clarification requests and overall action steps, they do not yield consistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T09:36:53Z)
• Breaking Thought Patterns: A Multi-Dimensional Reasoning Framework for LLMs [3.5056249219229296]
  Large language models (LLMs) are often constrained by rigid reasoning processes, limiting their ability to generate creative responses.<n>To address this, a novel framework called LADDER is proposed, combining Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, and multi-dimensional up/down-sampling strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T07:59:51Z)
• Reasoning Meets Personalization: Unleashing the Potential of Large Reasoning Model for Personalized Generation [21.89080753903469]
  We present the first systematic evaluation of large reasoning models (LRMs) for personalization tasks.<n>Our analysis identifies three key limitations: divergent thinking, misalignment of response formats, and ineffective use of retrieved information.<n>We propose Reinforced Reasoning for Personalization (model), a novel framework that incorporates a hierarchical reasoning thought template to guide LRMs in generating structured outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T07:30:13Z)
• ModelingAgent: Bridging LLMs and Mathematical Modeling for Real-World Challenges [72.19809898215857]
  We introduce ModelingBench, a novel benchmark featuring real-world-inspired, open-ended problems from math modeling competitions across diverse domains.<n>These tasks require translating natural language into formal mathematical formulations, applying appropriate tools, and producing structured, defensible reports.<n>We also present ModelingAgent, a multi-agent framework that coordinates tool use, supports structured, creative solutions, and generates well-grounded, creative solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T03:33:23Z)
• Deliberate Reasoning in Language Models as Structure-Aware Planning with an Accurate World Model [14.480267340831542]
  Structure-aware Planning with an Accurate World Model (SWAP)<n>SWAP integrates structured knowledge representation with learned planning.<n>We evaluate SWAP across diverse reasoning-intensive benchmarks including math reasoning, logical reasoning, and coding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:23:36Z)
• Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation [39.546827184857754]
  In this work, we introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity.<n>We define NEOGAUGE, a metric that quantifies both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative responses.<n>We test the proposed framework on Codeforces problems, which serve as both a natural dataset for coding tasks and a collection of prior human solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T05:55:22Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.