Towards Lightweight Reliability: Using Soft Prompts for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00919v1
• Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 23:02:33 GMT
• Title: Towards Lightweight Reliability: Using Soft Prompts for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have seen widespread adoption across various domains, yet their reliability is frequently undermined by hallucinations.<n>In high-stakes domains, these errors can reduce trust and introduce real-world risk.<n>We present a parameter-efficient approach that uses soft prompts to mitigate hallucinated content and promote responsible abstention.
• Score: 5.019869660665509
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have seen widespread adoption across various domains, yet their reliability is frequently undermined by hallucinations - responses that are plausible-sounding but factually incorrect. In high-stakes domains, these errors can reduce trust and introduce real-world risk. To address this challenge, we present a parameter-efficient approach that uses soft prompts to mitigate hallucinated content and promote responsible abstention in generative question-answering (QA) tasks. Our method, called Responsible Contrastive Soft Prompting (RCSP), uses a composite loss to train soft prompts that balance three goals: suppressing hallucinatory content, encouraging abstention under uncertainty, and preserving or improving factual recall. To achieve these goals, we incorporate contrastive loss, curriculum learning, and KL regularization into our training mechanism. We evaluate our approach on five diverse generative QA datasets using an LLM-as-a-Judge framework. Experimental results on the Gemma 3 (12B) and Llama 3.1 (8B) backbones demonstrate that RCSP effectively balances factual recall with hallucination suppression and abstention, yielding a generally superior F-score over standard reasoning and instruction-based prompting baselines. Notably, these improvements are achieved by training only a fraction of the parameters required by other tuning techniques. Our results demonstrate that soft prompts provide a modular and computationally efficient path toward improving LLM reliability.

Related papers

• BALTO: Balanced Token-Level Policy Optimization for Hallucination Mitigation [51.22170603236523]
  We propose a Balanced Token-level Policy Optimization framework for hallucination mitigation.<n>BalTO extracts checkable factual claims, verifies them against the reference context, and projects claim-level judgments to token-level labels.<n>Experiments on ConFiQA, RAGTruth, and FinLLM-Eval show that BALTO achieves the highest faithfulness across all six model--benchmark settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T16:25:59Z)
• I-CALM: Incentivizing Confidence-Aware Abstention for LLM Hallucination Mitigation [2.688126466709795]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently produce confident but incorrect answers.<n>We study whether prompt-only interventions can reduce hallucination risk without modifying the model.<n>Results show the framework can improve selective answering on factual questions without retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-05T00:15:41Z)
• Balancing Faithfulness and Performance in Reasoning via Multi-Listener Soft Execution [79.98699884805636]
  Reasoning Execution by Multiple Listeners (REMUL) is a multi-party reinforcement learning approach.<n>REMUL builds on the hypothesis that reasoning traces which other parties can follow will be more faithful.<n>Speakers are rewarded for producing reasoning that is clear to listeners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T02:55:55Z)
• Towards Self-Robust LLMs: Intrinsic Prompt Noise Resistance via CoIPO [38.36870540583669]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable and steadily improving performance across a wide range of tasks.<n>In real-world applications, user prompts provided to LLMs often contain imperfections, which may undermine the quality of the model's responses.<n>We propose a Contrastive Learning-based Inverse Direct Preference Optimization (CoIPO) method that minimizes the discrepancy between the label-aligned logits produced by the model under a clean prompt and its noisy counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T13:24:50Z)
• Are Reasoning LLMs Robust to Interventions on Their Chain-of-Thought? [79.86483056611105]
  Reasoning LLMs generate step-by-step chains of thought before giving an answer.<n>How robust are these reasoning traces to disruptions that occur within them?<n>We introduce a controlled evaluation framework that perturbs a model's own CoT at fixed timesteps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T10:02:58Z)
• Stop Rewarding Hallucinated Steps: Faithfulness-Aware Step-Level Reinforcement Learning for Small Reasoning Models [59.6715047267181]
  Small reasoning models (SRMs) are prone to hallucinations, especially in intermediate reasoning steps.<n>Existing mitigation methods based on online reinforcement learning rely on outcome-based rewards or coarse-grained chain-of-thought evaluation.<n>We propose Faithfulness-Aware Step-Level Reinforcement Learning (FaithRL), introducing step-level supervision via explicit faithfulness rewards from a process reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T17:15:12Z)
• Ground What You See: Hallucination-Resistant MLLMs via Caption Feedback, Diversity-Aware Sampling, and Conflict Regularization [38.469173375694076]
  This paper systematically analyzes the root causes of hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>It identifies three critical factors: (1) an over-reliance on chained visual reasoning, where inaccurate initial descriptions anchor subsequent inferences to incorrect premises; (2) insufficient exploration diversity during policy optimization, leading the model to generate overly confident but erroneous outputs; and (3) destructive conflicts between training samples, where NTK similarity causes false associations and unstable parameter updates.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly reduces hallucination rates and effectively enhances the inference accuracy of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T07:59:18Z)
• HADSF: Aspect Aware Semantic Control for Explainable Recommendation [4.75127493865044]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) promise more effective information extraction for recommender systems.<n>We propose a two-stage approach that induces a compact, corpus-level aspect vocabulary via adaptive selection and then performs vocabulary-guided, explicitly constrained extraction of structured aspect-opinion triples.<n> Experiments on approximately 3 million reviews spanning 1.5B-70B parameters show that, when integrated into standard rating predictors, HADSF yields consistent reductions in prediction error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T20:49:33Z)
• Teaching LLMs to Abstain via Fine-Grained Semantic Confidence Reward [4.921470220575384]
  Mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical for their reliable deployment.<n>We propose a novel reinforcement learning framework built on $textbfunderlineFine-grained underlineSemantic underlineConfidence underlineReward (Ours)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T03:00:35Z)
• GRAIT: Gradient-Driven Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning for Effective Hallucination Mitigation [62.63014905981601]
  Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (RAIT) aims to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) by improving their ability to refuse responses to questions beyond their knowledge.<n>Effective RAIT must address two key challenges: firstly, effectively reject unknown questions to minimize hallucinations; secondly, avoid over-refusal to ensure questions that can be correctly answered are not rejected.<n>GraIT employs gradient-driven sample selection to effectively minimize hallucinations and (2) introduces an adaptive weighting mechanism during fine-tuning to reduce the risk of over-refusal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T14:11:30Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• Do Compressed LLMs Forget Knowledge? An Experimental Study with Practical Implications [63.29358103217275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often leads to reduced performance, especially for knowledge-intensive tasks. We propose two conjectures on the nature of the damage: one is certain knowledge being forgotten (or erased) after compression. We introduce a variant called Inference-time Dynamic Prompting (IDP) that can effectively increase prompt diversity without incurring any inference overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T03:12:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.