ChartArena: Benchmarking Chart Parsing across Languages, Scenarios, and Formats

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01348v2
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:49:48 GMT
• Title: ChartArena: Benchmarking Chart Parsing across Languages, Scenarios, and Formats
• Abstract summary: We introduce ChartArena, a comprehensive benchmark covering eight chart families spanning both numeric charts and diagrammatic structures.<n>The dataset is built via a human-agent annotation pipeline with multi-stage human verification to ensure annotation reliability.<n>We observe three consistent findings: (i) frontier models such as Gemini 3.1 Pro lead overall, yet the strongest open-source systems are rapidly closing the gap.
• Score: 31.5696204376104
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Charts are a primary medium for conveying quantitative and relational information, yet systematically evaluating chart parsing models remains difficult. Existing benchmarks focus on narrow chart types and leave diagrammatic structures such as flowcharts and mind maps largely unaddressed, while models produce outputs in incompatible formats, and datasets rarely include the printed or hand-drawn images encountered in practice. To address these issues, we introduce ChartArena, a comprehensive bilingual benchmark covering eight chart families spanning both numeric charts and diagrammatic structures, each evaluated across three visual scenarios: digital renderings, printed photos, and hand-drawn photos. The dataset is built via a human-agent collaborative annotation pipeline with multi-stage human verification to ensure annotation reliability. To enable fair cross-model comparison, we further design a format-agnostic evaluation protocol that maps heterogeneous outputs into two canonical semantic spaces, a normalized triple view and a directed graph view, and scores them with structure-aware metrics. Through extensive evaluation of 26 leading MLLMs, we observe three consistent findings: (i) frontier proprietary models such as Gemini 3.1 Pro lead overall, yet the strongest open-source systems are rapidly closing the gap; (ii) document parsing models handle numeric charts reasonably but fall sharply behind on diagrammatic structures; and (iii) expert chart parsers remain limited to narrow chart families. Across all models, radar charts and hand-drawn scenarios stay especially challenging. These findings show that ChartArena exposes clear capability gaps and provides a unified foundation for future progress. ChartArena is publicly available at https://github.com/pspdada/ChartArena.

Related papers

• ChartAnno: Evaluating MLLMs for Chart Annotation Generation [32.95031991526117]
  We introduce ChartAnno, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on chart annotation generation.<n>It contains 1,200 real-world charts with paired code and annotation instructions across three levels of instruction specificity.<n>Results show that proprietary models remain stronger overall, although large-scale open-source models narrow the gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T11:01:38Z)
• ChartDiff: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Comprehending Pairs of Charts [0.22843885788439797]
  We introduce ChartDiff, the first large-scale benchmark for cross-chart comparative summarization.<n>ChartDiff consists of 8,541 chart pairs spanning diverse data sources, chart types, and visual styles.<n>Using ChartDiff, we evaluate general-purpose, chart-specialized, and pipeline-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T18:29:02Z)
• ChartPoint: Guiding MLLMs with Grounding Reflection for Chart Reasoning [54.86473583610112]
  We propose PointCoT, which integrates reflective interaction into chain-of-thought reasoning in charts.<n>By prompting MLLMs to generate bounding boxes and re-render charts based on location annotations, we establish connections between textual reasoning steps and visual grounding regions.<n>We develop two instruction-tuned models, ChartPointQ2 and ChartPointQ2.5, which outperform state-of-the-art across several chart benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T04:01:55Z)
• BigCharts-R1: Enhanced Chart Reasoning with Visual Reinforcement Finetuning [51.472854950300416]
  We propose BigCharts, a dataset creation pipeline that generates visually diverse chart images.<n>Unlike purely synthetic datasets, BigCharts incorporates real-world data, ensuring authenticity and visual diversity.<n>By introducing novel reward signals specifically designed for chart reasoning, our approach enhances model robustness and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T13:39:17Z)
• InterChart: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning Across Decomposed and Distributed Chart Information [44.79888692172093]
  We introduce InterChart, a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how well vision-language models (VLMs) reason across multiple related charts.<n>We organize the benchmark into three tiers of increasing difficulty: factual reasoning over individual charts, integrative analysis across synthetically aligned chart sets, and semantic inference over visually complex, real-world chart pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T05:19:23Z)
• ChartLens: Fine-grained Visual Attribution in Charts [106.44872805609673]
  Post-Hoc Visual Attribution for Charts identifies fine-grained chart elements that validate a given chart-associated response.<n>We propose ChartLens, a novel chart attribution algorithm that uses segmentation-based techniques to identify chart objects.<n>Our evaluations show that ChartLens improves fine-grained attributions by 26-66%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T23:17:32Z)
• Socratic Chart: Cooperating Multiple Agents for Robust SVG Chart Understanding [14.75820681491341]
  Existing benchmarks reveal reliance on text-based shortcuts and probabilistic pattern-matching rather than genuine visual reasoning.<n>We propose Socratic Chart, a new framework that transforms chart images into Scalable Vector Graphics representations.<n>Our framework surpasses state-of-the-art models in accurately capturing chart primitives and improving reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T00:07:39Z)
• RefChartQA: Grounding Visual Answer on Chart Images through Instruction Tuning [63.599057862999]
  RefChartQA is a novel benchmark that integrates Chart Question Answering (ChartQA) with visual grounding.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating spatial awareness via grounding improves response accuracy by over 15%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T15:50:08Z)
• On Pre-training of Multimodal Language Models Customized for Chart Understanding [83.99377088129282]
  This paper explores the training processes necessary to improve MLLMs' comprehension of charts.<n>We introduce CHOPINLLM, an MLLM tailored for in-depth chart comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:58:36Z)
• ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild [28.643565008567172]
  We introduce ChartGemma, a novel chart understanding and reasoning model developed over PaliGemma. Rather than relying on underlying data tables, ChartGemma is trained on instruction-tuning data generated directly from chart images. Our simple approach achieves state-of-the-art results across $5$ benchmarks spanning chart summarization, question answering, and fact-checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T22:16:40Z)
• ChartAssisstant: A Universal Chart Multimodal Language Model via Chart-to-Table Pre-training and Multitask Instruction Tuning [54.89249749894061]
  ChartAssistant is a vision-language model for universal chart comprehension and reasoning. It undergoes a two-stage training process, starting with pre-training on chart-to-table parsing to align chart and text. Experimental results demonstrate significant performance gains over the state-of-the-art UniChart and Chartllama method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T17:51:48Z)
• Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarization [9.647079534077472]
  We present Chart-to-text, a large-scale benchmark with two datasets and a total of 44,096 charts. We explain the dataset construction process and analyze the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-12T17:01:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.