Linguistic Productivity in Large Language Models: Models Coerce, but do not Preempt

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02953v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 23:11:39 GMT
• Title: Linguistic Productivity in Large Language Models: Models Coerce, but do not Preempt
• Abstract summary: We show that large language models can reproduce with nonce words constructional productivity (entrenchment) in cases of coercion.<n>We also show that even the largest models do not extend negative evidence to novel language.
• Score: 5.856894361762095
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Usage-based theories of grammars posit that creative productivity of the structures of language is both bolstered and constrained by two distinct frequency signals: entrenchment, stemming from high frequency usage, and preemption, stemming from having never observed a particular linguistic structure in a context where one might expect that structure to appear. Large Language Models are also usage-based, in the sense that the structures of language are learned through exposure to vast amounts of text. Here, we test whether or not the opposing statistical forces of entrenchment and preemption also encourage and constrain linguistic productivity in LLMs. We demonstrate across model architectures that larger models recognize and can reproduce with nonce words constructional productivity (entrenchment) in cases of coercion, wherein the broader constructional context coerces an atypical interpretation of a lexical item. However, we also show that even the largest models do not extend negative evidence to novel language, and statistical preemption does not enable models to avoid overgeneralization of patterns that are semantically felicitous, but never observed in data.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Concept-Spilling Across Languages in LLMs [7.577675422356702]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable cross-lingual abilities, yet often exhibit a systematic bias toward representations from other languages.<n>This paper presents a novel comparative framework for evaluating multilingual semantic robustness by measuring how models handle polysemous words across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T19:28:26Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Multiword Expressions in Multilingual and Code-Switched Contexts [2.519319150166215]
  This study evaluates how state-of-the-art language models process the ambiguity of potentially idiomatic multiword expressions.<n>We find that large language models, despite their strengths, struggle with nuanced language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:39:28Z)
• Infusing Prompts with Syntax and Semantics [0.0]
  We analyze the effect of directly infusing various kinds of syntactic and semantic information into large language models.<n>We show that linguistic analysis can significantly boost language models, to the point that we have surpassed previous best systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T23:49:38Z)
• On Robustness of Prompt-based Semantic Parsing with Large Pre-trained Language Model: An Empirical Study on Codex [48.588772371355816]
  This paper presents the first empirical study on the adversarial robustness of a large prompt-based language model of code, codex. Our results demonstrate that the state-of-the-art (SOTA) code-language models are vulnerable to carefully crafted adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T13:21:00Z)
• Model Criticism for Long-Form Text Generation [113.13900836015122]
  We apply a statistical tool, model criticism in latent space, to evaluate the high-level structure of generated text. We perform experiments on three representative aspects of high-level discourse -- coherence, coreference, and topicality. We find that transformer-based language models are able to capture topical structures but have a harder time maintaining structural coherence or modeling coreference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T04:35:58Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Language Models are Few-shot Multilingual Learners [66.11011385895195]
  We evaluate the multilingual skills of the GPT and T5 models in conducting multi-class classification on non-English languages. We show that, given a few English examples as context, pre-trained language models can predict not only English test samples but also non-English ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T03:08:22Z)
• Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexity [47.268323020210175]
  We analyze whether text generated from language models exhibits the statistical tendencies present in the human-generated text on which they were trained. We find that neural language models appear to learn only a subset of the tendencies considered, but align much more closely with empirical trends than proposed theoretical distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T20:13:44Z)
• Recurrent Neural Network Language Models Always Learn English-Like Relative Clause Attachment [17.995905582226463]
  We compare model performance in English and Spanish to show that non-linguistic biases in RNN LMs advantageously overlap with syntactic structure in English but not Spanish. English models may appear to acquire human-like syntactic preferences, while models trained on Spanish fail to acquire comparable human-like preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T01:21:47Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.