Computational conceptual history of scientific concepts: From early digital methods to LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04118v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:28:29 GMT
• Title: Computational conceptual history of scientific concepts: From early digital methods to LLMs
• Abstract summary: This article situates large language models (LLMs) within the longer history of computational approaches to concept analysis.<n>We examine what LLMs add to existing methods, how they inherit longstanding problems, and review recent case studies that employ them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article situates large language models (LLMs) within the longer history of computational approaches to concept analysis in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS). We examine what LLMs add to existing methods, how they inherit longstanding problems, and review recent case studies that employ them. In the first part, we reconstruct computational conceptual history before LLMs by bringing together three strands of work: early digital methods in HPSS, distributional approaches from digital history and related research, and lexical semantic change detection. We provide an overview of the main challenges and opportunities, focusing on corpus construction, operationalization and modelling choices, and evaluation and interpretation. In the second part, we turn to the era of LLMs, starting with a short introduction to LLMs before reviewing LLM-based work on lexical semantic change detection and relevant case studies in HPSS. We then revisit the earlier methodological questions, showing how issues of corpus construction, model choice and training data, operationalization trade-offs, and evaluation and interpretation play out in LLM-based workflows.

Related papers

• On the Evolution of Federated Post-Training Large Language Models: A Model Accessibility View [82.19096285469115]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables training models across decentralized data silos while preserving client data privacy.<n>Recent research has explored efficient methods for post-training large language models (LLMs) within FL to address computational and communication challenges.<n>An inference-only paradigm (black-box FedLLM) has emerged to address these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T09:52:31Z)
• Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
  This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z)
• Large Language Models for History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science: Interpretive Uses, Methodological Challenges, and Critical Perspectives [0.0]
  This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) as research tools in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS)<n>LLMs are remarkably effective at processing unstructured text and inferring meaning from context.<n>This raises both opportunities and challenges for HPSS, which emphasizes interpretive methodologies and understands meaning as context-dependent, ambiguous, and historically situated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T21:44:13Z)
• Recalibrating the Compass: Integrating Large Language Models into Classical Research Methods [0.48670895845367385]
  This paper examines how large language models (LLMs) are transforming core quantitative methods in communication research.<n>Rather than replacing classical approaches, LLMs introduce new possibilities for coding and interpreting text.<n>The paper argues that classical research logics remain essential as the field integrates LLMs and generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T01:38:02Z)
• Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysis [0.1433758865948252]
  Large language models (LLMs) have seen widespread adoption in many domains including digital forensics.<n>This paper proposes a standardized methodology to quantitatively evaluate the application of LLMs for digital forensic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T01:22:30Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• Large Language Models for Causal Discovery: Current Landscape and Future Directions [5.540272236593385]
  Causal discovery (CD) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative fields in artificial intelligence.<n>This survey examines how LLMs are transforming CD across three key dimensions: direct causal extraction from text, integration of domain knowledge into statistical methods, and refinement of causal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T20:48:53Z)
• Large Language Models: A Survey [66.39828929831017]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have drawn a lot of attention due to their strong performance on a wide range of natural language tasks.<n>LLMs' ability of general-purpose language understanding and generation is acquired by training billions of model's parameters on massive amounts of text data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T05:37:09Z)
• Continual Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey [95.79977915131145]
  Large language models (LLMs) are not amenable to frequent re-training, due to high training costs arising from their massive scale. This paper surveys recent works on continual learning for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T12:34:09Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.