The Digital Apprentice: A Framework for Human-Directed Agentic AI Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04321v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:49:13 GMT
• Title: The Digital Apprentice: A Framework for Human-Directed Agentic AI Development
• Abstract summary: We present a framework for scalable, safe AI agency in which autonomy is earned, not assumed.<n>The Digital Apprentice is a developmental learner that internalizes the tacit methodology of a directing human.<n>We show how catching data drift and applying a different technique at runtime recovers degraded quality dimensions under traffic shift.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI deployments face a recurring design tension: heavy human oversight limits scale, while broad autonomy outruns accountability. Neither posture provides the governance infrastructure required for responsible delegation. We present the Digital Apprentice, a framework for scalable, safe AI agency in which autonomy is earned, not assumed. The Digital Apprentice is a developmental learner that internalizes the tacit methodology of a directing human, graduating through per-skill autonomy tiers only when empirical evidence justifies it. The result is an agent that becomes genuinely useful over time while remaining aligned to a specific human's standards. Three architectural components make this possible. (1) Methodology capture, distilling a directing professional's tacit approach into structured assets. (2) Authorization, with autonomy escalation gated by explicit human approval. (3) Continuous alignment, correcting drift at runtime and converting each correction into owned preference data. We instantiate this framework as an inference-time control plane. We mathematically model the quality framework and discuss policies and techniques designed to raise quality. We apply the framework to an open professional corpus, and we show how catching data drift and applying a different technique at runtime recovers degraded quality dimensions under traffic shift. The implication extends beyond any single application. We believe these three pillars, stitched together as a system, form a safer and more viable path to agentic systems that can scale without sacrificing trust.

Related papers

• Generative AI for trustworthy systems - Towards a health check model [9.729745750450874]
  The Trustworthy Autonomy Health Check Model is a structured, multidimensional instrument for characterizing how organizations establish trust in GenAI-assisted software engineering.<n>A cross-cutting overlay of four trust paradigms captures how trust is established, complementing the dimensions capturing what must be trustworthy.<n>The model is diagnostic rather than prescriptive: it supports cross-organizational comparison, surfaces configurational trade-offs, and locates an organization in a shared space without imposing a single progression path.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T09:48:58Z)
• MetaRSI / RSI2: A Meta-Recursive Self-Improving System for Recursive Self-Improving Systems Themselves [65.60481414910728]
  Recursive self-improvement lets a system improve the model-building machinery from its own failures, so every later model inherits the gain.<n>Yet RSI has been validated almost exclusively on coding and formal benchmarks such as science QA and mathematics.<n>We argue RSI must next operate across real, diverse scientific, engineering, and meta-scientific domains, not where formal evaluation is merely tractable.<n>We present MetaRSI-v1, where improvement is the scheduled composition of three typed operators over one unified paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T05:15:31Z)
• RAIL: An Automatic Classifier of the Artificial Intelligence Readiness Level [0.0]
  Assessing the maturity of artificial intelligence technologies is essential for investment decisions, project management, and policy monitoring.<n>The available readiness frameworks are heterogeneous and difficult to apply automatically.<n>This paper makes two contributions: first, we unify these three frameworks into the Unified AI Readiness Level (AIRL), a nine-level scale built on an environmental evidence ladder.<n>Second, we propose RAIL, a panel-of-experts classifier that operationalizes the scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T16:17:41Z)
• ComBodied Agents: a New Paradigm of Human-Centric Agentic AI [121.60938707072069]
  We introduce Combodied Agents, a human-centered paradigm that perceives, models, predicts, and supports individual human-state trajectories over time.<n>We unify fragmented capabilities across personal assistants, health agents, AI companions, and adaptive human--AI systems into a closed loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T13:35:58Z)
• Specifying the Delegated-Autonomy Boundary: Requirements Engineering for Agentic AI [5.421928928336395]
  Agentic AI systems plan, maintain state, and act in external environments with varying degrees of autonomy.<n>Current practices bury these decisions inside prompts, tool schemas, and runtime policies, even though they are requirements-level commitments.<n>This paper proposes two complementary artifacts: an Agency Justification Record and an Agentic Delegation Policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T12:27:39Z)
• Critique of Agent Model [6.669064478699597]
  We argue that genuine agency requires these structures to be emphinternalized within the system itself.<n>We propose the Goal-Identity-Configurator (GIC) architecture for a general-purpose agent model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T22:50:02Z)
• Beyond the 'Diff': Addressing Agentic Entropy in Agentic Software Development [42.371764229953165]
  We propose a process-oriented explainability framework that exposes how agentic decisions unfold across time, tool calls, and architectural boundaries.<n>Our approach provides intent-level telemetry that complements, rather than replaces, existing review practices.<n>By treating cognitive drift as a first-class concern alongside code quality, our framework supports the minimum level of human comprehension required for agentic oversight to remain substantive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T12:55:28Z)
• Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety [1.3763052684269788]
  We identify three structural problems that emerge from core properties of AI models.<n>The solution is Institutional AI, a system-level approach that treats alignment as a question of effective governance of AI agent collectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T17:08:26Z)
• Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning [84.70211451226835]
  Large Language Model (LLM) Agents are constrained by a dependency on human-curated data.<n>We introduce Agent0, a fully autonomous framework that evolves high-performing agents without external data.<n>Agent0 substantially boosts reasoning capabilities, improving the Qwen3-8B-Base model by 18% on mathematical reasoning and 24% on general reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T05:01:57Z)
• ReAL-AD: Towards Human-Like Reasoning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving [27.75047397292818]
  End-to-end autonomous driving has emerged as a promising approach to unify perception, prediction, and planning within a single framework.<n>We propose ReAL-AD, a Reasoning-Augmented Learning framework that structures decision-making in autonomous driving based on the three-tier human cognitive model.<n>We show that integrating our framework improves planning accuracy and safety by over 30%, making end-to-end autonomous driving more interpretable and aligned with human-like hierarchical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T02:23:24Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• Cascaded Language Models for Cost-effective Human-AI Decision-Making [52.81324217423194]
  We present a cascaded LLM decision framework that adaptively delegates tasks across multiple tiers of expertise.<n>First, a deferral policy determines whether to accept the base model's answer or regenerate it with a large model.<n>Second, an abstention policy decides whether the cascade model response is sufficiently certain or requires human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T15:36:22Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework in which AI models autonomously generate and validate new knowledge.<n>Central to this approach is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward that guides learning without requiring human benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:48:02Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.