QO-Bench: Diagnosing Query-Operator-Preserving Retrieval over Typed Event Tuples

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04646v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 09:14:43 GMT
• Title: QO-Bench: Diagnosing Query-Operator-Preserving Retrieval over Typed Event Tuples
• Abstract summary: We introduce QO-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for query-operator question answering over typed events.<n>The benchmark covers 22,984 news articles and 614 corporate events across 18 query templates, evaluated on 785 questions.
• Score: 3.4933579621415576
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many real-world questions over business, legal, and scientific corpora are natural-language versions of database-style queries over records latent in text. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are optimized primarily for semantic relevance, but retrieving plausible passages does not guarantee correct query execution. We introduce QO-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for query-operator question answering over typed event tuples. The benchmark covers 22,984 news articles and 614 corporate events across 18 query templates, evaluated on 785 questions. Each gold answer is deterministically computed from typed event tuples and scored by recall, with answers matched to the gold tuples by exact match rather than an LLM judge. This design enables operator-level diagnosis such as joins and intersection. We evaluate RAG, ReAct RAG, GraphRAG, and information-extraction-to-SQL under matched conditions, with a long-context oracle ceiling to isolate retrieval failure. A two-axis framework -- index-time preservation versus query-time execution -- predicts where each paradigm fails, and the results bear it out: systems retrieve relevant text but discard the typed values operators need, and the deployable paradigm ranking inverts across operators, with similarity retrieval leading on filter/project and extraction-to-SQL on intersection and counting. Even given the gold evidence, a long-context oracle stays far from saturated, so operator execution -- not retrieval alone -- is a core bottleneck that a stronger answer model does not remove. QO-Bench reframes the goal from passage relevance to query-operator-preserving retrieval.

Related papers

• ORDER: Task-Conditioned Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.6028767235872965]
  In this paper, we introduce a query-conditioned RAG framework that jointly adapts indexing and retrieval to the incoming query.<n>We evaluate our framework on large-scale, heterogeneous historical archives and show that conditioning both indexing and retrieval on the query consistently outperforms both naive baselines and strong state-of-the-art RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T11:23:16Z)
• VisDocAgentBench: Benchmarking Agents for Visually Rich Document Retrieval [65.89247522243959]
  VisDocAgentBench is a closed-corpus benchmark comparing static and agentic retrieval under a ranked-output contract.<n>It contains 2,375 pages from 100 documents and 120 unique-target queries balanced across direct, one-bridge, and two-bridge evidence structures.<n>A strong late-interaction visual retriever reaches 97.50% Recall@1 on direct items but 2.50% on two-bridge items, exposing the limits of query--target matching when relevance depends on corpus context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T15:23:06Z)
• TopBench: A Benchmark for Implicit Prediction and Reasoning over Tabular Question Answering [80.93487993878836]
  A common class of real-world queries is implicitly predictive, requiring the inference of unobserved answers from historical patterns rather than mere retrieval.<n>These queries introduce two challenges: recognizing latent intent and reliable predictive reasoning over massive tables.<n>We introduce TopBench, a benchmark consisting of 779 samples across four sub-tasks, ranging from single-point prediction to decision making, treatment effect analysis, and complex reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T16:22:51Z)
• MDER-DR: Multi-Hop Question Answering with Entity-Centric Summaries [2.756584457554517]
  Map-Disambiguate-Enrich-Reduce (MDER) generates context-derived triple descriptions and integrates them with entity-level summaries.<n>Decompose-Resolve (DR) decomposes user queries into resolvable triples and grounds them in the Knowledge Graph.<n>MDER and DR form an LLM-driven QA pipeline that is robust to sparse, incomplete, and complex relational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T18:38:44Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• SPARTA: Scalable and Principled Benchmark of Tree-Structured Multi-hop QA over Text and Tables [13.249024309069236]
  Table-Text question answering tasks require models that can reason across long text and source tables, traversing multiple hops and executing complex operations such as aggregation.<n>We present SPARTA, an end-to-end construction framework that automatically generates largescale Table-Text QA benchmarks with lightweight human validation.<n>On SPARTA, state-of-the-art models that reach over 70 F1 on HybridQA or over 50 F1 on OTT-QA drop by more than 30 F1 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T17:59:51Z)
• Can we Retrieve Everything All at Once? ARM: An Alignment-Oriented LLM-based Retrieval Method [48.14236175156835]
  ARM aims to better align the question with the organization of the data collection by exploring relationships among data objects.<n>It outperforms standard RAG with query decomposition by up to 5.2 pt in execution accuracy and agentic RAG (ReAct) by up to 15.9 pt.<n>It achieves up to 5.5 pt and 19.3 pt higher F1 match scores compared to these approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:07:19Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents.<n>Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.<n>We show that incorporating explicit reasoning about the query improves retrieval performance by up to 12.2 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• Decoding a Neural Retriever's Latent Space for Query Suggestion [28.410064376447718]
  We show that it is possible to decode a meaningful query from its latent representation and, when moving in the right direction in latent space, to decode a query that retrieves the relevant paragraph. We employ the query decoder to generate a large synthetic dataset of query reformulations for MSMarco. On this data, we train a pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) T5 model for the application of query suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T16:19:31Z)
• Query Resolution for Conversational Search with Limited Supervision [63.131221660019776]
  We propose QuReTeC (Query Resolution by Term Classification), a neural query resolution model based on bidirectional transformers. We show that QuReTeC outperforms state-of-the-art models, and furthermore, that our distant supervision method can be used to substantially reduce the amount of human-curated data required to train QuReTeC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-24T11:37:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.