Large Language Models in K-12 Education: Alignment with State Curriculum Standards and Student Personas

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04846v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:14:33 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models in K-12 Education: Alignment with State Curriculum Standards and Student Personas
• Abstract summary: We identify variations in U.S. History curricula across states and evaluate the extent to which different LLMs reflect these state-specific curricular differences.<n>We find that while models are able to adjust their presentation of historical topics, these shifts may come from the perceived political leanings of states.
• Score: 3.147897243459717
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly popular in educational settings, they raise important questions about the ethical implications of their use. Publicly available online chatbots are quickly improving in capability and accuracy leading to more widespread use, including among students looking for help with their homework. This makes it crucial to consider whether these models are aligned with educational standards. Because curriculum standards in the United States are set at the state level, they differ significantly in required content, emphasis, and narrative focus. In this work, we develop an LLM-based pipeline to identify variations in U.S. History curricula across states and evaluate the extent to which different LLMs reflect these state-specific curricular differences. In addition, we conduct controlled experiments that vary user personas by stating user attributes such as geographic location, grade level, gender and race to evaluate the sensitivity of LLM responses to user characteristics. We find that while models are able to adjust their presentation of historical topics, these shifts may come from the perceived political leanings of states and do not necessarily reflect actual curriculum content. Additionally, models successfully adapt to a student's grade level while showing minimal sensitivity to race or gender, suggesting they are capable of useful adaptation to student personas with limited demographic bias. Together, these findings highlight potential risks that open access to LLM chatbots may cause to student learning outcomes stemming from misalignment with state curriculum standards and highlight the need for more robust alignment techniques.

Related papers

• The Role of Implicit and Explicit Demographic Signals in Large Language Model-based Student Assessment [24.32015609344653]
  Large Language Models are now common in student assessment, but we know little about how student demographics affect their use.<n>We set up controlled prompts to test 1) explicit demographic effects, where we mention demographic details directly, and 2) implicit effects, where we use conversation history as a demographic signal.<n>In both explicit and implicit cases, the models pick up on demographic cues and can change their scoring, feedback, and answers accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T11:07:26Z)
• Clause Encounters of the Third Kind: Can LLMs Replace Language Teachers? [0.0]
  This paper examines whether state-of-the-art LLMs can deliver the kind of corrective feedback and methodological explanations that language learners need.<n>The evaluation employs automated metrics (GLEU, BERTScore) but also human expert judgments to capture dimensions that purely computational measures miss.<n>While models demonstrate impressive surface-level correction abilities, their explanations often lack the terminological and domain knowledge that effective language teaching requires.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T08:58:30Z)
• Sociodemographic Biases in Educational Counselling by Large Language Models [61.30199414932204]
  This study examines sociodemographic biases in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate responses from six LLMs answering questions about 900 vignettes describing students in diverse circumstances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T14:08:22Z)
• Revisiting LLM Value Probing Strategies: Are They Robust and Expressive? [81.49470136653665]
  We evaluate the robustness and expressiveness of value representations across three widely used probing strategies.<n>We show that the demographic context has little effect on the free-text generation, and the models' values only weakly correlate with their preference for value-based actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T18:56:41Z)
• Can LLMs Reliably Simulate Real Students' Abilities in Mathematics and Reading Comprehension? [8.558834738072363]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as proxy students in the development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs)<n>We collect a dataset of 489 items from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) covering mathematics and reading comprehension in grades 4, 8, and 12.<n>We apply an Item Response Theory (IRT) model to position 11 diverse and state-of-the-art LLMs on the same ability scale as real student populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T00:36:57Z)
• Does the Prompt-based Large Language Model Recognize Students' Demographics and Introduce Bias in Essay Scoring? [3.7498611358320733]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in Automated Essay Scoring (AES)<n>This study explores the relationship between the model's predictive power of students' demographic attributes based on their written works and its predictive bias in the scoring task in the prompt-based paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T05:36:28Z)
• Embracing AI in Education: Understanding the Surge in Large Language Model Use by Secondary Students [53.20318273452059]
  Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT have opened up new avenues in education.<n>Despite school restrictions, our survey of over 300 middle and high school students revealed that a remarkable 70% of students have utilized LLMs.<n>We propose a few ideas to address such issues, including subject-specific models, personalized learning, and AI classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T19:19:34Z)
• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [71.65505524599888]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language.<n>This paper shows that the ideological stance of an LLM appears to reflect the worldview of its creators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderation [64.26243779985393]
  For subjective tasks such as hate detection, where people perceive hate differently, the Large Language Model's (LLM) ability to represent diverse groups is unclear. By including additional context in prompts, we analyze LLM's sensitivity to geographical priming, persona attributes, and numerical information to assess how well the needs of various groups are reflected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:43:17Z)
• LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Do [2.2469442203227863]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of automated evaluators, reporting several key findings on their behavior. We discover that English evaluation capabilities significantly influence language-specific evaluation capabilities, enabling evaluators trained in English to easily transfer their skills to other languages. We find that state-of-the-art evaluators struggle with challenging prompts, in either English or Korean, underscoring their limitations in assessing or generating complex reasoning questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:40:02Z)
• CIVICS: Building a Dataset for Examining Culturally-Informed Values in Large Language Models [59.22460740026037]
  "CIVICS: Culturally-Informed & Values-Inclusive Corpus for Societal impacts" dataset is designed to evaluate the social and cultural variation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We create a hand-crafted, multilingual dataset of value-laden prompts which address specific socially sensitive topics, including LGBTQI rights, social welfare, immigration, disability rights, and surrogacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T20:19:10Z)
• Sociodemographic Prompting is Not Yet an Effective Approach for Simulating Subjective Judgments with LLMs [13.744746481528711]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used to simulate human responses across diverse contexts.<n>We evaluate nine popular LLMs on their ability to understand demographic differences in two subjective judgment tasks: politeness and offensiveness.<n>We find that in zero-shot settings, most models' predictions for both tasks align more closely with labels from White participants than those from Asian or Black participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T10:02:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.