MASF: A Multi-Model Adaptive Selection Framework for Abstractive Text summarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05494v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 22:34:40 GMT
• Title: MASF: A Multi-Model Adaptive Selection Framework for Abstractive Text summarization
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a Multi-Model Adaptive Summarization Framework to improve the robustness and quality of abstractive text summarization.<n>It integrates multiple fine-tuned transformer-based summarization models and introduces an adaptive selection mechanism.<n>It achieves the highest BERTScore among all compared methods with a score of 88.63%.
• Score: 0.2864713389096699
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information. This paper presents a Multi-Model Adaptive Summarization Framework designed to improve the robustness and quality of abstractive text summarization. Relying on a single model often leads to inconsistent summarization quality across articles with varying structures and topics. To address this limitation, the proposed framework integrates multiple fine-tuned transformer-based summarization models and introduces an adaptive selection mechanism. In this framework, each model independently generates a candidate summary for the same input article. The generated summaries are then evaluated using automatic evaluation metrics that capture both lexical similarity and semantic relevance. Based on these scores, the framework selects the highest-quality summary as the final output. The models are fine-tuned and evaluated on the widely used CNN/DailyMail news summarization dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves the highest BERTScore among all compared methods with a score of 88.63%. It also outperforms several LLMs such as GPT3-D2, Falcon-7b, and Mpt-7b, highlighting its effectiveness and robustness. These findings highlight the effectiveness of leveraging multiple transformer-based models within an adaptive selection strategy to improve the quality and robustness of automatic text summarization systems.

Related papers

• Trait-Aware Policy Optimization for Autoregressive Multi-Trait Essay Scoring [27.596544379317436]
  Trait-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO) is a post-training framework tailored to autoregressive multi-trait scoring.<n>Our method decomposes rewards along both the sample and trait dimensions, combining global scoring consistency, trait-level accuracy, format validity, and inter-trait dependency preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T11:41:37Z)
• Q-Save: Towards Scoring and Attribution for Generated Video Evaluation [65.83319736145869]
  We present Q-Save, a new benchmark dataset and model for holistic evaluation of AI-generated video (AIGV) quality.<n>The dataset contains near 10000 videos, each annotated with a scalar mean opinion score (MOS) and fine-grained attribution labels.<n>We propose a unified evaluation model that jointly performs quality scoring and attribution-based explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T07:00:21Z)
• TWSSenti: A Novel Hybrid Framework for Topic-Wise Sentiment Analysis on Social Media Using Transformer Models [0.0]
  This study explores a hybrid framework combining transformer-based models to improve sentiment classification accuracy and robustness.<n>The framework addresses challenges such as noisy data, contextual ambiguity, and generalization across diverse datasets.<n>This research highlights its applicability to real-world tasks such as social media monitoring, customer sentiment analysis, and public opinion tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T05:44:11Z)
• Multi-Level Attention and Contrastive Learning for Enhanced Text Classification with an Optimized Transformer [0.0]
  This paper studies a text classification algorithm based on an improved Transformer to improve the performance and efficiency of the model in text classification tasks.<n>The improved Transformer model outperforms the comparative models such as BiLSTM, CNN, standard Transformer, and BERT in terms of classification accuracy, F1 score, and recall rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T08:32:27Z)
• Assessment of Transformer-Based Encoder-Decoder Model for Human-Like Summarization [0.05852077003870416]
  This work leverages transformer-based BART model for human-like summarization. On training and fine-tuning the encoder-decoder model, it is tested with diverse sample articles. The finetuned model performance is compared with the baseline pretrained model. Empirical results on BBC News articles highlight that the gold standard summaries written by humans are more factually consistent by 17%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:25:04Z)
• Information-Theoretic Distillation for Reference-less Summarization [67.51150817011617]
  We present a novel framework to distill a powerful summarizer based on the information-theoretic objective for summarization. We start off from Pythia-2.8B as the teacher model, which is not yet capable of summarization. We arrive at a compact but powerful summarizer with only 568M parameters that performs competitively against ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:42:08Z)
• Controllable Topic-Focused Abstractive Summarization [57.8015120583044]
  Controlled abstractive summarization focuses on producing condensed versions of a source article to cover specific aspects. This paper presents a new Transformer-based architecture capable of producing topic-focused summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T03:51:38Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluation [82.31575622685902]
  A document summary's quality can be assessed by human annotators on various criteria, both objective ones like grammar and correctness, and subjective ones like informativeness, succinctness, and appeal. Most of the automatic evaluation methods like BLUE/ROUGE may be not able to adequately capture the above dimensions. We propose a new evaluation framework based on LLMs, which provides a comprehensive evaluation framework by comparing generated text and reference text from both objective and subjective aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T10:40:59Z)
• Long Document Summarization with Top-down and Bottom-up Inference [113.29319668246407]
  We propose a principled inference framework to improve summarization models on two aspects. Our framework assumes a hierarchical latent structure of a document where the top-level captures the long range dependency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework on a diverse set of summarization datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T01:24:51Z)
• Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization [98.27031108197944]
  Span-Fact is a suite of two factual correction models that leverages knowledge learned from question answering models to make corrections in system-generated summaries via span selection. Our models employ single or multi-masking strategies to either iteratively or auto-regressively replace entities in order to ensure semantic consistency w.r.t. the source text. Experiments show that our models significantly boost the factual consistency of system-generated summaries without sacrificing summary quality in terms of both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T02:51:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.