When Should Memory Stay Silent: Measuring Memory-Use Boundaries in Memory-Augmented Conversational Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06055v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:54:51 GMT
• Title: When Should Memory Stay Silent: Measuring Memory-Use Boundaries in Memory-Augmented Conversational Agents
• Abstract summary: Long-term memory enables language model agents to support personalized interactions.<n>It remains unclear when available memories warrant integration into responses.<n>Retrieval systems reduce exposure but do not eliminate integration once sensitive memory reaches the generator.
• Score: 13.354128891280316
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Long-term memory enables language model agents to support personalized interactions, but it remains unclear when available memories warrant integration into responses. Existing memory evaluations emphasize retrieval accuracy and downstream task utility, while overlooking whether retrieved sensitive memory content is warranted in the current turn. We introduce RBI-Eval, a controlled measurement study built around a probe set that compares model behavior with and without access to sensitive memory under identical benign prompts. We evaluate four base LLMs against a matched no-memory reference across four memory-access settings: full-context exposure and three retrieval systems. Our results reveal substantial behavioral divergence. With memory available, the separation score for sensitive-memory integration decreases by 8.9\%--26.6\% relative to the matched no-memory reference for GPT-5.4-mini, but by 51.1\%--82.9\% for Claude-Sonnet-4.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, and Qwen3.5-9B. Control experiments on DeepSeek and GPT-5.4-mini show this effect is specific to sensitive content, rather than general personalization. Retrieval systems reduce exposure but do not eliminate integration once sensitive memory reaches the generator. These findings suggest safe personalization requires memory-aware decisions at both retrieval and generation time.

Related papers

• Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents [72.3752981234916]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.<n>We present Memory as a Controlled Process (MemCon), a framework that models memory operations as a Markov Decision Process.<n>MemCon consistently outperforms multiple memory baselines by up to 15.2 points in task success while reducing token consumption by 5-20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T08:32:40Z)
• MEMPROBE: Probing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery [58.64329475683699]
  We argue that long-term memory should be evaluated as an auditable post-interaction artifact.<n>We instantiate this view in MEMPROBE, a benchmark in which a memory-equipped agent assists simulated users.<n>We find that successful assistance and recoverable memory behave as distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T13:52:46Z)
• Beyond Similarity: Trustworthy Memory Search for Personal AI Agents [25.265839311088516]
  We study memory search as a trust boundary in personal AI agents.<n>MemGate is a lightweight and deployable memory plug-in for trustworthy memory search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T11:54:29Z)
• MemCog: From Memory-as-Tool to Memory-as-Cognition in Conversational Agents [16.587587215932526]
  We propose a Memory-as-Cognition system that makes memory access an integral part of the reasoning process.<n>MemCog organizes user knowledge as Navigable Memory Store with associative link graphs.<n>We additionally construct ProactiveMemBench, the first benchmark for evaluating proactive memory triggering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T06:48:33Z)
• MemGuard: Preventing Memory Contamination in Long-Term Memory-Augmented Large Language Models [56.31411457917676]
  We introduce MemGuard, a type-aware memory framework that preserves functional memory boundaries during memory construction and retrieval.<n>Across hallucination and long-horizon conversation benchmarks, MemGuard improves memory reliability by up to 28.27% while retrieving up to 5.8x fewer memory tokens than prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T06:04:19Z)
• RecMem: Recurrence-based Memory Consolidation for Efficient and Effective Long-Running LLM Agents [16.625864201773343]
  RecMem stores incoming interactions in a subconscious memory layer and encodes them using lightweight embedding models for retrieval.<n>Experiments show that RecMem reduces the memory construction token cost of three SOTA memory systems by up to 87% while exceeding their accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T15:17:36Z)
• Learning When to Remember: Risk-Sensitive Contextual Bandits for Abstention-Aware Memory Retrieval in LLM-Based Coding Agents [0.0]
  coding agents increasingly rely on external memory to reuse prior experience, repair traces, and repository-local operational knowledge.<n>This paper reframes issue-memory use as a selective, risk-sensitive control problem rather than a pure top-k retrieval problem.<n>We introduce RSCB-MC, a risk-sensitive contextual bandit memory controller that decides whether an agent should use no memory, inject the top resolution, summarize multiple candidates, perform high-precision or high-recall retrieval, abstain, or ask for feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T00:32:53Z)
• From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents [38.52713500119118]
  We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations.<n>The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending.<n>Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA) is a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T21:31:01Z)
• MemEvoBench: Benchmarking Memory MisEvolution in LLM Agents [78.95081012334116]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) with persistent memory enhances interaction continuity and personalization but introduces new safety risks.<n> contaminated or biased memory accumulation can trigger abnormal agent behaviors.<n>MemeEvoBench is the first benchmark evaluating memory safety in LLM agents against adversarial memory injection, noisy tool outputs, and biased feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T07:29:52Z)
• ImplicitMemBench: Measuring Unconscious Behavioral Adaptation in Large Language Models [60.14219417402433]
  Existing memory benchmarks for LLM agents evaluate explicit recall of facts, yet overlook implicit memory where experience becomes automated behavior without conscious retrieval.<n>We introduce ImplicitMemBench, the first systematic benchmark evaluating implicit memory through three constructs drawn from standard cognitive-science accounts of non-declarative memory.<n>Our 300-item suite employs a unified Learning/Priming-Interfere-Test protocol with first-attempt scoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T10:26:32Z)
• Evoking User Memory: Personalizing LLM via Recollection-Familiarity Adaptive Retrieval [59.295767860331004]
  RF-Mem is a familiarity uncertainty-guided dual-path memory retriever.<n>It embeds human-like dual-process recognition into the retriever.<n>It consistently outperforms one-shot retrieval and full-context reasoning under fixed budget and latency constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T06:31:44Z)
• MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
  Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.