Symb-xMIL: Symbolic Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Digital Pathology
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06224v2
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 07:54:06 GMT
- Title: Symb-xMIL: Symbolic Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Digital Pathology
- Abstract summary: Explanations of multiple instance learning (MIL) models are widely used for validation and discovery in digital histopathology.<n>We introduce explainable MIL (Symb-xMIL), a post-hoc explanation framework that quantifies how a MIL model's behavior aligns with human-readable decision rules.<n>We evaluate Symb-xMIL on synthetic and real-world histopathology datasets.
- Score: 12.138272834650502
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Explanations of multiple instance learning (MIL) models are widely used for validation and discovery in digital histopathology. Existing methods primarily rely on heatmaps that highlight influential regions but do not explain how evidence from different tissue regions is combined to produce a prediction. This limits interpretability, especially when decisions depend on interactions between tissue features. We introduce Symbolic explainable MIL (Symb-xMIL), a post-hoc explanation framework that quantifies how a MIL model's behavior aligns with human-readable decision rules, expressed as logical relationships (e.g., AND, OR, NOT) between input features. These alignment scores reveal semantic patterns underlying the model's predictions. We evaluate Symb-xMIL on synthetic and real-world histopathology datasets. On synthetic MIL data, Symb-xMIL reliably recovers ground-truth logical rules. In a clinical tumor detection task, the best-aligned rules uncover heterogeneous decision patterns and expose hidden model errors. On an HPV-prediction task on TCGA-HNSCC, a cohort of head and neck cancer, our framework refines patient survival stratification beyond HPV status with potential clinical relevance. Overall, Symb-xMIL extends MIL explainability beyond visual attribution toward structured, rule-based reasoning, enabling more transparent and semantically grounded interpretation of model predictions.
Related papers
- Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z) - Multimodal Graph-based Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders [73.90451172929117]
Diagnosing esophageal motility disorders pose significant challenges due to the complexity of high-resolution impedance manometry data and variability in clinical interpretation.<n>This work explores the feasibility of a multimodal Machine Learning-based classification approach that combines HRIM recordings with patient-specific information and incorporates a graph-based modeling of esophageal physiology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T14:52:12Z) - Beyond Attention Heatmaps: How to Get Better Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning Models in Histopathology [14.800356715603087]
Multiple instance learning (MIL) has enabled substantial progress in computational histopathology.<n>Heatmaps are widely used to validate MIL models and to discover tissue biomarkers.<n>We introduce a general framework for evaluating the quality of MIL heatmaps without requiring additional labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T12:45:48Z) - C$^2$MIL: Synchronizing Semantic and Topological Causalities in Multiple Instance Learning for Robust and Interpretable Survival Analysis [40.54380946239706]
Graph-based Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is widely used in survival analysis with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs)<n> variations in staining and scanning can introduce semantic bias, while topological subgraphs that are not relevant to the causal relationships can create noise.<n>We propose a novel and interpretable dual causal graph-based MIL model, C$2$MIL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T14:17:39Z) - Prototype-Based Multiple Instance Learning for Gigapixel Whole Slide Image Classification [3.9817342822800916]
ProtoMIL is an inherently interpretable MIL model for whole slide image (WSI) analysis.<n>Our approach employs a sparse autoencoder to discover human-interpretable concepts from the image feature space.<n>ProtoMIL allows users to perform model interventions by altering the input concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T12:44:03Z) - Pathological Prior-Guided Multiple Instance Learning For Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Breast Cancer Whole Slide Image Classification [50.899861205016265]
We propose a new framework PaGMIL to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in breast cancer WSI classification.<n>Our framework introduces two key components into the common MIL model architecture.<n>We evaluate the continual learning performance of PaGMIL across several public breast cancer datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T04:51:58Z) - MIRROR: Multi-Modal Pathological Self-Supervised Representation Learning via Modality Alignment and Retention [57.044719143401664]
Histopathology and transcriptomics are fundamental modalities in oncology, encapsulating the morphological and molecular aspects of the disease.<n>We present MIRROR, a novel multi-modal representation learning method designed to foster both modality alignment and retention.<n>Extensive evaluations on TCGA cohorts for cancer subtyping and survival analysis highlight MIRROR's superior performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-01T07:02:30Z) - Generative causal testing to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neuroscience [82.995061475971]
We present generative causal testing (GCT), a framework for generating concise explanations of language selectivity in the brain.<n>We show that GCT can dissect fine-grained differences between brain areas with similar functional selectivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T15:57:48Z) - xMIL: Insightful Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology [13.939494815120666]
Multiple instance learning (MIL) is an effective and widely used approach for weakly supervised machine learning.<n>We revisit MIL through the lens of explainable AI (XAI) and introduce xMIL, a refined framework with more general assumptions.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous explanation attempts with particularly improved faithfulness scores on challenging biomarker prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T17:26:40Z) - SI-MIL: Taming Deep MIL for Self-Interpretability in Gigapixel Histopathology [31.21142367010005]
Self-Interpretable MIL (SI-MIL) is a method intrinsically designed for interpretability from the very outset.
SI-MIL employs a deep MIL framework to guide an interpretable branch grounded on handcrafted pathological features.
With its linear prediction constraints, SI-MIL challenges the prevalent myth of an inevitable trade-off between model interpretability and performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T18:59:05Z) - Reproducibility in Multiple Instance Learning: A Case For Algorithmic
Unit Tests [59.623267208433255]
Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a sub-domain of classification problems with positive and negative labels and a "bag" of inputs.
In this work, we examine five of the most prominent deep-MIL models and find that none of them respects the standard MIL assumption.
We identify and demonstrate this problem via a proposed "algorithmic unit test", where we create synthetic datasets that can be solved by a MIL respecting model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T03:05:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.