Auditing Training Data in Domain-adapted LLMs: LoRA-MINT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06946v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:19:03 GMT
• Title: Auditing Training Data in Domain-adapted LLMs: LoRA-MINT
• Abstract summary: We present LoRA-MINT, a new methodology for Membership Inference Test (MINT) applied to recent Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned for specific Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks through Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)<n>The primary goal is to assess whether individual samples were part of the training data of these adapted models, providing a useful auditing tool for the management of intellectual property and sensitive data.
• Score: 15.934462293442792
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We present LoRA-MINT, a new methodology for Membership Inference Test (MINT) applied to recent Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned for specific Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks through Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). The primary goal is to assess whether individual samples were part of the training data of these adapted models, providing a useful auditing tool for the management of intellectual property and sensitive data. Our analysis explores the relationship between model perplexity and membership status, providing a systematic framework for estimating data exposure in fine-tuned LLMs. We conducted experiments on four models and three benchmark datasets, obtaining precision values in determining if given data were used for training ranging from 0.77 to 0.92, which outperform state-of-the-art baselines and demonstrate the robustness and generality of the proposed method. In general, our findings underscore the potential of LoRA-MINT as an effective and scalable framework for auditing LLMs, improving transparency, and fostering the ethical and responsible deployment of AI and NLP technologies. For the sake of concreteness and current relevance, our discussion and experiments are centered on LoRAadjusted LLMs, but note that most of the presented methodology is easily applicable for auditing training data given any other technique for adapting LLMs or, more generally, any other domain-adapted AI models.

Related papers

• Principled Synthetic Data Enables the First Scaling Laws for LLMs in Recommendation [27.59197535041953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a promising frontier for recommender systems.<n>This paper introduces a novel, layered framework for generating high-quality synthetic data.<n>We empirically demonstrate, for the first time, robust power-law scaling for an LLM that is continually pre-trained on our high-quality, recommendation-specific data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T01:15:15Z)
• Nonparametric LLM Evaluation from Preference Data [86.96268870461472]
  We propose a nonparametric statistical framework, DMLEval, for comparing and ranking large language models (LLMs) from preference data.<n>Our framework provides practitioners with powerful, state-of-the-art methods for comparing or ranking LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T15:00:07Z)
• Learn More, Forget Less: A Gradient-Aware Data Selection Approach for LLM [51.21051698747157]
  We propose a self-adaptive gradient-aware data selection approach (GrADS) for supervised fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we design self-guided criteria that leverage the magnitude and statistical distribution of gradients to prioritize examples that contribute the most to the model's learning process.<n>Through extensive experimentation with various LLMs across diverse domains such as medicine, law, and finance, GrADS has demonstrated significant efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T08:34:50Z)
• Analytical Survey of Learning with Low-Resource Data: From Analysis to Investigation [192.53529928861818]
  Learning with high-resource data has demonstrated substantial success in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>However, the costs associated with data annotation and model training remain significant.<n>This survey employs active sampling theory to analyze the generalization error and label complexity associated with learning from low-resource data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T03:15:42Z)
• Test-Time Learning for Large Language Models [33.11605667376906]
  We propose a Test-Time Learning (TTL) paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>LLMs dynamically adapts to target domains using only unlabeled test data during testing.<n>We demonstrate through experiments that TLM improves performance by at least 20% compared to original LLMs on domain knowledge adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T02:18:59Z)
• FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Models [79.41859481668618]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the fact-checking studies.<n>Existing automated fact-checking evaluation methods rely on static datasets and classification metrics.<n>We introduce FACT-AUDIT, an agent-driven framework that adaptively and dynamically assesses LLMs' fact-checking capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T07:44:22Z)
• From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learning [153.8110509961261]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been employed for generating entirely new data instances and providing more cost-effective annotations.<n>This survey aims to serve as an up-to-date resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to gain an intuitive understanding of LLM-based AL techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T12:58:17Z)
• Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learning [65.23593936798662]
  We show that fine-tuning with LLM-generated data improves target task performance and reduces non-target task degradation.<n>This is the first work to provide an empirical explanation based on token perplexity reduction to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in LLMs after fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T08:18:56Z)
• Fine-tuning Large Language Models with Limited Data: A Survey and Practical Guide [18.62224900123851]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with limited data poses a practical challenge in low-resource languages, specialized domains, and constrained deployment settings.<n>This paper presents a structured and practical survey of recent methods for fine-tuning LLMs in data-scarce scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T15:55:37Z)
• The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunities [0.35998666903987897]
  This report examines the fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) It outlines the historical evolution of LLMs from traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) models to their pivotal role in AI. The report introduces a structured seven-stage pipeline for fine-tuning LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T14:48:02Z)
• How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective [29.924482732745954]
  Existing approaches assume data points to-be-forgotten are independent, ignoring their inter-connectivity.<n>We propose PISTOL, a method for compiling structural datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:22:36Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.