HAVE: Host Active Verification Engine for Closing the Contextual Reality Gap in Security Digital Twins
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06968v1
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:54:23 GMT
- Title: HAVE: Host Active Verification Engine for Closing the Contextual Reality Gap in Security Digital Twins
- Abstract summary: Security Digital Twins (SDTs) provide continuously updated virtual replicas of infrastructure for threat simulation.<n>We present an SDT extension that deploys a safety-constrained host agent to measure the empirical probability of compromise.<n> Evaluation across four vulnerability classes, three security tiers, and two production binaries shows HAVE reduces $P_textreach$ by 38.2% in false-positive scenarios and increases it by 132.4% in false-negative scenarios.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Security Digital Twins (SDTs) provide continuously updated virtual replicas of infrastructure for threat simulation, yet they rely on theoretical CVSS scores to assign lateral-movement probabilities -- creating the Contextual Reality Gap: risk is overestimated where unacknowledged mitigations neutralize exploits, and drastically underestimated where logic flaws bypass all memory-safety defenses. We present the Host Active Verification Engine (HAVE), an SDT extension that deploys a safety-constrained host agent to measure the empirical probability of compromise $\hat{p}$ via maximum-likelihood estimation over snapshot-isolated Bernoulli trials. A Wilson interval-width confidence weight $α_w$ propagates $\hat{p}$ into Monte Carlo simulations via a Bayesian blending rule formally related to the Beta-Binomial posterior. Evaluation across four vulnerability classes, three security tiers, and two production binaries shows HAVE reduces $P_{\text{reach}}$ by 38.2% in false-positive scenarios and increases it by 132.4% in false-negative scenarios, with a net +124.1% correction; post-HAVE estimates vary by only $1.12\times$ across calibration exponents $κ$, versus $4.6\times$ for CVSS-only baselines.
Related papers
- FUSE: An Evaluating Framework for Dangerous Capabilities of LLMs [24.30721158142313]
Fragmented safety evaluation undermines the governance of dangerous AI capabilities.<n>We present a modular framework that evaluates each model through three orthogonal pipelines---Knowledge, Defense, and Harm.<n>Our first contribution is a horizontal comparison of dangerous capability across models and model families.<n>The second is a temporal analysis of capability evolution: tracking $K$, $D$, and $H$ against model release dates reveals that dangerous capability has not monotonically declined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-02T06:31:39Z) - SANE: State Anomaly Neutralization for Stable Extreme-Context Delta-Rule Models [53.86918766240095]
Delta-Rule recurrent models maintain a fixed-size state, enabling $O(1)$ inference memory but potentially becoming unstable under extreme-context extrapolation.<n>We propose textbfState Anomaly Neutralization (SANE), which applies adaptive $tanh$ compression at chunk boundaries while preserving the intra-chunk parallel structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T10:41:07Z) - Counterfactual Shapley Credit Assignment [49.39649767581182]
Credit Assignment Problem (CAP) is fundamental to developing efficient and explainable Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents.<n>We introduce Counterfactual Shapley Credit Assignment, a novel framework that attributes credit and blame via the Counterfactual Shapley ($$-value)<n>We derive a consistent estimator that computes $$$-values, enabling a new class of policy methods, $$-PPO, combined with Prioritized Trajectory Replay (PTR)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-18T23:28:20Z) - When Skills Don't Help: A Negative Result on Procedural Knowledge for Tool-Grounded Agents in Offensive Cybersecurity [1.3591163361204688]
Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge loaded into an agent at inference time.<n>They are widely reported to improve task pass rates by an average of 16.2percentage points across diverse domains.<n>Yet the same benchmarks show wide variance, with 16 of 84 tasks suffering negative deltas when Skills are introduced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T15:48:35Z) - MEMSAD: Gradient-Coupled Anomaly Detection for Memory Poisoning in Retrieval-Augmented Agents [0.0]
We formalize memory poisoning attacks on retrieval-augmented agents as a Stackelberg game with a unified evaluation framework.<n>We show faithful evaluation increases measured attack success by $4times$ (ASR-R: 0.25 to 1.00$)<n>Our primary contribution is MEMSAD, a calibration-based defense grounded in a gradient coupling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T08:15:41Z) - Tight Convergence Rates for Online Distributed Linear Estimation with Adversarial Measurements [66.94250413799232]
We study mean estimation of a random vector $X$ in a distributed parameter-server-worker setup.<n>Key challenges are adversarial measurements and asynchrony.<n>Results provide a unified finite-time characterization of robustness, identifiability, and statistical efficiency in distributed linear estimation with adversarial workers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T11:45:55Z) - Byzantine-Robust and Differentially Private Federated Optimization under Weaker Assumptions [89.52532304099522]
Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a shared model without centralizing their raw data, offering an inherent level of privacy.<n> gradients and model updates can still leak sensitive information, while malicious servers may mount adversarial attacks such as Byzantine manipulation.<n>These vulnerabilities highlight the need to address differential privacy (DP) and Byzantine robustness within a unified framework.<n>We propose Byz-Clip21-SGD2M, a new algorithm that integrates robust aggregation with double momentum and carefully designed clipping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T17:39:09Z) - ReliabilityBench: Evaluating LLM Agent Reliability Under Production-Like Stress Conditions [0.32928123659012326]
Existing benchmarks for tool-using LLM agents primarily report single-run success rates and miss reliability properties required in production.<n>We introduce textbfReliabilityBench, a benchmark for evaluating agent reliability across three dimensions.<n>We evaluate two models (Gemini 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o) and two agent architectures (ReAct, Reflexion) across four domains (scheduling, travel, customer support, e-commerce) over 1,280 episodes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-03T13:41:33Z) - Backdoor Collapse: Eliminating Unknown Threats via Known Backdoor Aggregation in Language Models [75.29749026964154]
Ourmethod reduces the average Attack Success Rate to 4.41% across multiple benchmarks.<n>Clean accuracy and utility are preserved within 0.5% of the original model.<n>The defense generalizes across different types of backdoors, confirming its robustness in practical deployment scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T15:47:35Z) - Measuring Ransomware Lateral Movement Susceptibility via Privilege-Weighted Adjacency Matrix Exponentiation [0.0]
We present a graph-theoretic formulation that casts lateral movement as a path-closure problem over a probability semiring to measure lateral susceptibility and estimate blast radius.<n>We model lateral movement as a probabilistic process using a pivot potential factor $pi(s)$ for each service.<n>This computation of a $K$-hop compromise probability matrix captures how compromise propagates through the network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T17:07:34Z) - Probabilistically Tightened Linear Relaxation-based Perturbation Analysis for Neural Network Verification [83.25968588249776]
We present a novel framework that combines over-approximation techniques from LiRPA-based approaches with a sampling-based method to compute tight intermediate reachable sets.<n>With negligible computational overhead, $textttPT-LiRPA$ exploiting the estimated reachable sets, significantly tightens the lower and upper linear bounds of a neural network's output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T18:45:53Z) - Certified Robustness Under Bounded Levenshtein Distance [55.54271307451233]
We propose the first method for computing the Lipschitz constant of convolutional classifiers with respect to the Levenshtein distance.<n>Our method, LipsLev, is able to obtain $38.80$% and $13.93$% verified accuracy at distance $1$ and $2$ respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T13:58:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.