Constrained Dominant Sets for Multimodal Document Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07252v2
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:27:36 GMT
- Title: Constrained Dominant Sets for Multimodal Document Question Answering
- Abstract summary: Long multimodal document question answering is limited by which evidence reaches the reader, rather than by the quantity retrieved.<n>This work introduces a retriever that selects evidence as a Constrained Dominant Set on a query-augmented affinity graph.
- Score: 6.071121358322323
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Long multimodal document question answering is limited by which evidence reaches the reader, rather than by the quantity retrieved. In lengthy documents, findings often recur across figures, captions, and introductory sentences, causing similarity based retrievers in modern multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems to allocate resources to near-duplicates while overlooking complementary evidence. This work introduces a retriever that selects evidence as a Constrained Dominant Set (CDS) on a query-augmented affinity graph, offering three advantages that similarity ranking does not. First, the query is encoded as a hard structural constraint, ensuring that every selected element is directly connected to the question through the cluster anchor. Second, the relevance-redundancy balance is determined automatically by a spectral bound, eliminating the need for manually tuned trade offs required by diversity-aware selectors. Third, the selection process achieves a global equilibrium via replicator dynamics, thereby avoiding the distortions introduced by greedy heuristics. The method is inherently graph-based and does not require training. Using a Qwen3-VL-32B reader, CDS establishes a new state of the art on VisDoMBench ($66.99$ average) and improves over the no-retrieval baseline by $37.1$ points on VisDoMBench and $4.8$ on MMLongBench-Doc.
Related papers
- FinSAgent: Corpus-Aligned Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Evidence-Grounded SEC Filing Question Answering [16.415865984091667]
FinSAgent is an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning.<n>FinSAgent improves retrieval coverage and answer correctness over strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T16:03:15Z) - Hierarchical Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Long Document Understanding [95.51688464037096]
We introduce HIEVI-RAG, a hierarchical, evidence-driven multimodal RAG framework for closed-domain document understanding.<n>Our framework significantly outperforms existing open-source baselines and exceeds the strongest reported baseline by an average of 8.05% in accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T03:08:28Z) - Modality Relevance is not Modality Utility: Post-hoc Selective Modality Escalation for Cost-Aware Multimodal RAG [7.082282444371973]
We show that the relevance of a modality to a question is a weak predictor of whether that modality is actually needed to answer correctly.<n>We propose textbfpost-hoc selective modality escalation: answer cheaply from text and tables, run a verifier, and pay for VLM evidence only there.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-03T15:28:16Z) - Rethinking RAG in Long Videos: What to Retrieve and How to Use It? [56.38819694781005]
We introduce V-RAGBench, a benchmark of $langle$query, evidence chunk, answer$rangle$ triplets that enables faithful, decoupled evaluation of retrieval and generation.<n>We also present CARVE, a method that runs parallel retrievers across configurations and employs chunk-adaptive reranking to identify the winning configuration for each chunk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T10:05:49Z) - R$^3$AG: Retriever Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [59.47703698994575]
R$3$AG decomposes retriever capability into two learnable dimensions: retrieval quality and generation utility.<n>R$3$AG consistently outperforms both the best individual retrievers and state-of-the-art static routing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T06:51:20Z) - MDER-DR: Multi-Hop Question Answering with Entity-Centric Summaries [2.756584457554517]
Map-Disambiguate-Enrich-Reduce (MDER) generates context-derived triple descriptions and integrates them with entity-level summaries.<n>Decompose-Resolve (DR) decomposes user queries into resolvable triples and grounds them in the Knowledge Graph.<n>MDER and DR form an LLM-driven QA pipeline that is robust to sparse, incomplete, and complex relational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T18:38:44Z) - LITTA: Late-Interaction and Test-Time Alignment for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Retrieval [0.0]
LITTA is a query-expansion-centric retrieval framework for evidence page retrieval.<n>Given a user query, LITTA generates complementary query variants using a large language model.<n>Candidates from expanded queries are aggregated through reciprocal rank fusion to improve evidence coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T13:25:39Z) - MARA: A Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Document Question Answering [51.19392014547221]
Retrieval-based multimodal document QA aims to identify and integrate relevant information from visually rich documents with complex multimodal structures.<n>Current approaches rely on query-agnostic document representations that overlook salient content.<n>We propose the Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented (MARA) framework, which introduces query-adaptive generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T12:27:40Z) - $G^2$-Reader: Dual Evolving Graphs for Multimodal Document QA [53.491241153213565]
$G2$-Reader is a dual-graph system for multimodal question answering.<n>$G2$-Reader with Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct reaches 66.21% average accuracy, outperforming strong baselines and a standalone GPT-5 (53.08%)<n>On VisDoMBench across five multimodal domains, $G2$-Reader with Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct reaches 66.21% average accuracy, outperforming strong baselines and a standalone GPT-5 (53.08%)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T17:52:54Z) - Pixel-Grounded Retrieval for Knowledgeable Large Multimodal Models [58.46663983451155]
PixSearch is an end-to-end Segmenting Large Multimodal Model (LMM) that unifies region-level perception and retrieval-augmented reasoning.<n>During encoding, PixSearch emits search> tokens to trigger retrieval, selects query modalities (text, image, or region), and generates pixel-level masks that directly serve as visual queries.<n>On egocentric and entity-centric VQA benchmarks, PixSearch substantially improves factual consistency and generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T00:46:08Z) - Resolving Evidence Sparsity: Agentic Context Engineering for Long-Document Understanding [49.26132236798123]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have gradually become a primary approach in document understanding.<n>We propose SLEUTH, a multi agent framework that orchestrates a retriever and four collaborative agents in a coarse to fine process.<n>The framework identifies key textual and visual clues within the retrieved pages, filters for salient visual evidence such as tables and charts, and analyzes the query to devise a reasoning strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T03:09:40Z) - Hierarchical Sequence Iteration for Heterogeneous Question Answering [27.22775290181187]
This paper introduces HSEQ, a unified framework that linearizes documents, tables, and knowledge graphs into a reversible hierarchical sequence.<n> Experiments on HotpotQA (text), HybridQA/TAT-QA (table+text), and MetaQA (KG) show consistent EM/F1 gains over strong single-pass, multi-hop, and agentic RAG baselines with high efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T12:48:18Z) - Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z) - Cluster-based Adaptive Retrieval: Dynamic Context Selection for RAG Applications [8.946586077722822]
Cluster-based Adaptive Retrieval (CAR) is an algorithm that determines the optimal number of documents by analyzing the clustering patterns of ordered query-document similarity distances.<n>CAR consistently picks the optimal retrieval depth and achieves the highest TES score, outperforming every fixed top-k baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T05:11:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.