Sensitivity Analysis White Paper
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07809v1
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 19:37:27 GMT
- Title: Sensitivity Analysis White Paper
- Abstract summary: This paper organizes the broad sensitivity analysis literature into a coherent framework for use in complex simulation settings.<n>We review major classes of methods, including local and global approaches, variance-based techniques, screening methods, derivative-based methods, and uncertainty quantification tools.<n>The paper also discusses sensitivity auditing as a complementary perspective that emphasizes transparency, assumption tracking, and responsible use of models in decision-relevant settings.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Sensitivity analysis is an important component of simulation-based decision support because it helps analysts determine which inputs most strongly influence model outcomes under uncertainty. This paper organizes the broad sensitivity analysis literature into a coherent framework for use in complex simulation settings, with particular attention to military applications. We review major classes of methods, including local and global approaches, variance-based techniques, screening methods, derivative-based methods, and uncertainty quantification tools, and relate them to common analytical objectives such as factor prioritization, factor fixing, variance reduction, and factor mapping. The paper also discusses sensitivity auditing as a complementary perspective that emphasizes transparency, assumption tracking, and responsible use of models in decision-relevant settings.
Related papers
- Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges [1.8499314936771558]
This survey synthesizes recent advancements in mathematical reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our systematic review encompasses approximately 120 peer-reviewed studies and preprints, examining the evolution of this research area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T11:56:03Z) - K-Models: a Flexible and Interpretable Method for Ordinal Clustering with Application to Antigen-Antibody Interaction Profiles [65.21921642886367]
K-Models is a novel framework that integrates ordinal constraints and estimates key underlying elements of the random process generating the observed functional profiles.<n>The proposed method is evaluated through simulations and real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T13:35:44Z) - Mechanistic Interpretability as Statistical Estimation: A Variance Analysis of EAP-IG [10.620784202716404]
We argue that interpretability methods, such as circuit discovery, should be viewed as statistical estimators.<n>We present a systematic stability analysis of a state-of-the-art circuit discovery method: EAP-IG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T12:55:34Z) - An overview of model uncertainty and variability in LLM-based sentiment analysis. Challenges, mitigation strategies and the role of explainability [6.791108304863664]
This paper systematically explores the Model Variability Problem (MVP) in large language models (LLMs)<n>MVP is characterized by inconsistent sentiment polarization, uncertainty arising from inference mechanisms, prompt sensitivity, and biases in training data.<n>This study helps develop more reliable, explainable, and robust sentiment analysis models, facilitating their deployment in high-stakes domains such as finance, healthcare, and policymaking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-06T12:20:39Z) - Learning to Align Multi-Faceted Evaluation: A Unified and Robust Framework [61.38174427966444]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are being used more and more extensively for automated evaluation in various scenarios.<n>Previous studies have attempted to fine-tune open-source LLMs to replicate the evaluation explanations and judgments of powerful proprietary models.<n>We propose a novel evaluation framework, ARJudge, that adaptively formulates evaluation criteria and synthesizes both text-based and code-driven analyses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T06:31:45Z) - Methodology for an Analysis of Influencing Factors on 3D Object Detection Performance [0.0]
In automated driving, object detection is crucial for perceiving the environment.<n>We propose a novel methodology to analyze how object- and environment-related factors affect LiDAR- and camera-based 3D object detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-13T10:01:33Z) - Contrastive Factor Analysis [70.02770079785559]
This paper introduces a novel Contrastive Factor Analysis framework.
It aims to leverage factor analysis's advantageous properties within the realm of contrastive learning.
To further leverage the interpretability properties of non-negative factor analysis, it is extended to a non-negative version.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-31T16:52:00Z) - A Review of Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods and a comparative case study on Digit Classification [5.458813674116228]
Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) aims to detect influential input factors that lead to a model to arrive at a certain decision.
We provide a comprehensive review and a comparison on global sensitivity analysis methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T00:38:19Z) - Towards stable real-world equation discovery with assessing
differentiating quality influence [52.2980614912553]
We propose alternatives to the commonly used finite differences-based method.
We evaluate these methods in terms of applicability to problems, similar to the real ones, and their ability to ensure the convergence of equation discovery algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T23:32:06Z) - Sensitivity Analysis of High-Dimensional Models with Correlated Inputs [0.0]
The sensitivity of correlated parameters can not only differ in magnitude, but even the sign of the derivative-based index can be inverted.
We demonstrate that the sensitivity of the correlated parameters can not only differ in magnitude, but even the sign of the derivative-based index can be inverted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T14:48:54Z) - Differential privacy and robust statistics in high dimensions [49.50869296871643]
High-dimensional Propose-Test-Release (HPTR) builds upon three crucial components: the exponential mechanism, robust statistics, and the Propose-Test-Release mechanism.
We show that HPTR nearly achieves the optimal sample complexity under several scenarios studied in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-12T06:36:40Z) - Evaluating Sensitivity to the Stick-Breaking Prior in Bayesian
Nonparametrics [85.31247588089686]
We show that variational Bayesian methods can yield sensitivities with respect to parametric and nonparametric aspects of Bayesian models.
We provide both theoretical and empirical support for our variational approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-08T03:40:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.