Evaluating Sensitivity to the Stick-Breaking Prior in Bayesian Nonparametrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03584v2
• Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:44:03 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Sensitivity to the Stick-Breaking Prior in Bayesian Nonparametrics
• Authors: Ryan Giordano, Runjing Liu, Michael I. Jordan, Tamara Broderick
• Abstract summary: We show that variational Bayesian methods can yield sensitivities with respect to parametric and nonparametric aspects of Bayesian models. We provide both theoretical and empirical support for our variational approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis.
• Score: 85.31247588089686
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian models based on the Dirichlet process and other stick-breaking priors have been proposed as core ingredients for clustering, topic modeling, and other unsupervised learning tasks. Prior specification is, however, relatively difficult for such models, given that their flexibility implies that the consequences of prior choices are often relatively opaque. Moreover, these choices can have a substantial effect on posterior inferences. Thus, considerations of robustness need to go hand in hand with nonparametric modeling. In the current paper, we tackle this challenge by exploiting the fact that variational Bayesian methods, in addition to having computational advantages in fitting complex nonparametric models, also yield sensitivities with respect to parametric and nonparametric aspects of Bayesian models. In particular, we demonstrate how to assess the sensitivity of conclusions to the choice of concentration parameter and stick-breaking distribution for inferences under Dirichlet process mixtures and related mixture models. We provide both theoretical and empirical support for our variational approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis.

Related papers

• Bayesian Nonparametrics: An Alternative to Deep Learning [0.5801621787540265]
  This survey aims to delve into the significance of Bayesian nonparametrics, particularly in addressing complex challenges across various domains such as statistics, computer science, and electrical engineering. We uncover the versatility and efficacy of Bayesian nonparametric methodologies, paving the way for innovative solutions to intricate challenges across diverse disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T17:32:42Z)
• Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference [8.753065246797561]
  Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. We propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T10:14:10Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Robust probabilistic inference via a constrained transport metric [8.85031165304586]
  We offer a novel alternative by constructing an exponentially tilted empirical likelihood carefully designed to concentrate near a parametric family of distributions. The proposed approach finds applications in a wide variety of robust inference problems, where we intend to perform inference on the parameters associated with the centering distribution. We demonstrate superior performance of our methodology when compared against state-of-the-art robust Bayesian inference methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T16:10:06Z)
• Bayesian Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Models using Tensor Regression for Multi-environmental Trials [0.0]
  We propose a Bayesian tensor regression model to accommodate the effect of multiple factors on phenotype prediction. We adopt a set of prior distributions that resolve identifiability issues that may arise between the parameters in the model. We explore the applicability of our model by analysing real-world data related to wheat production across Ireland from 2010 to 2019.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T19:54:50Z)
• Surrogate Likelihoods for Variational Annealed Importance Sampling [11.144915453864854]
  We introduce a surrogate likelihood that can be learned jointly with other variational parameters. We show that our method performs well in practice and that it is well-suited for black-box inference in probabilistic programming frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T19:49:45Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
• Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalization [107.0464488046289]
  This paper investigates the problem of learning robust, generalizable prediction models from a combination of datasets. Part of the challenge of learning robust models lies in the influence of unobserved confounders. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T08:18:06Z)
• Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
  We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.