ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07962v1
• Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:40:47 GMT
• Title: ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in open-world reasoning and understanding.<n>It remains unclear whether these models genuinely synthesize cross-modal information to construct physically grounded reasoning chains.<n>We propose a novel multimodal Chronological Physical Dynamics Reasoning Benchmark ChronoPhyBench.
• Score: 31.44012988967088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in open-world reasoning and understanding. However, a critical ambiguity persists: it remains unclear whether these models genuinely synthesize cross-modal information to construct physically grounded reasoning chains, or if they merely exploit strong language priors to mask single-modality reliance, thereby hallucinating advanced multimodal capabilities. Motivated by this, and to rigorously mitigate language modality bias and shortcuts, we propose a novel multimodal Chrono}logical Physical Dynamics Reasoning Benchmark ChronoPhyBench, which unifies next state prediction with Visual Question Answering (VQA) paradigms by conditioning on historical video context and textual captions to enforce models to deduce subsequent physical states through both single image selection and the inherently more complex task of multiple frame chronological sorting. Concurrently, we construct a large-scale multimodal reasoning dataset curated using the ChronoPhyBench criteria, comprising over 10,000 long-form videos paired with meticulously annotated captions, totaling 5M tokens. Our experimental evaluations reveal a stark contrast to conclusions drawn by previous benchmarks. The capacity of current open-source models to perform physically grounded multimodal reasoning remains in its infancy. Ultimately, this work seeks to systematically stress-test the reasoning capabilities of multimodal models, quantify hallucination rates, and advance the development of Physical AI, thereby providing the community with a robust and transparent evaluation framework toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Related papers

• VLT: A Vision-Language-Time Series Multimodal Foundation Model for Industrial Intelligence [8.44621217686077]
  Industrial time series serve as the foundation for Prognostics and Health Management (PHM)<n>We propose VLT, a multimodal foundation model that jointly models time-series, frequency-spectrum visual representations, and textual knowledge.<n>VLT outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior robustness and generalization under few-shot, noisy, and incomplete-modality settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T02:53:54Z)
• Tracking the Truth: Object-Centric Spatio-Temporal Monitoring for Video Large Language Models [154.39583176906893]
  Large language models (MLs) have advanced understanding, they remain highly prone to hallucinations in scenes.<n>We argue this stems from a failure intemporal monitoring, the ability to persistently track object dynamic identities, states, and relations over time.<n>Existing benchmarks obscure this deficit relying on single final-answer queries that can often be resolved via local visual cues or statistical priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T14:32:36Z)
• The Expense of Seeing: Attaining Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning Within the Monolithic Paradigm [1.0742675209112622]
  We argue that current Vision-Language Models do not faithfully synthesise multimodal data.<n>We propose a radical, information-theoretic departure: the Modality Translation Protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T15:15:32Z)
• Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining [125.34714978184638]
  We provide empirical clarity through controlled, from-scratch pretraining experiments.<n>We adopt the Transfusion framework, using next-token prediction for language and diffusion for vision.<n>We demonstrate that the MoE architecture harmonizes this scaling asymmetry by providing the high model capacity required by language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:58:00Z)
• Multimodal Latent Reasoning via Hierarchical Visual Cues Injection [16.779425236020433]
  This work posits that robust reasoning should evolve within a latent space, integrating multimodal signals seamlessly.<n>We propose a novel framework that instills deliberate, "slow thinking" without depending on superficial textual rationales.<n>We show that test-time scaling is effective when incorporating vision knowledge, and that integrating hierarchical information significantly enhances the model's understanding of complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T06:31:12Z)
• PENDULUM: A Benchmark for Assessing Sycophancy in Multimodal Large Language Models [43.767942065379366]
  Sycophancy is a tendency of AI models to agree with user input at the expense of factual accuracy or in contradiction of visual evidence.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, textitPENDULUM, comprising approximately 2,000 human-curated Visual Question Answering pairs.<n>We observe substantial variability in model robustness and a pronounced susceptibility to sycophantic and hallucinatory behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:49:12Z)
• Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
  We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.<n>EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z)
• Multi-granularity Contrastive Cross-modal Collaborative Generation for End-to-End Long-term Video Question Answering [53.39158264785098]
  Long-term Video Question Answering (VideoQA) is a challenging vision-and-language bridging task. We present an entirely end-to-end solution for VideoQA: Multi-granularity Contrastive cross-modal collaborative Generation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T06:21:58Z)
• OmniBench: Towards The Future of Universal Omni-Language Models [63.16606414452612]
  We introduce OmniBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously.<n>Our evaluation reveals that open-source OLMs show significant limitations in instruction-following and reasoning in tri-modal contexts.<n>We advocate for developing more robust tri-modal integration techniques and training strategies to enhance OLM performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T17:59:05Z)
• AllSpark: A Multimodal Spatio-Temporal General Intelligence Model with Ten Modalities via Language as a Reference Framework [21.10693332367192]
  We present AllSpark, a multimodal-temporal general artificial intelligence model.<n>Our model integrates ten different modalities into a unified framework.<n> Experiments indicate that the incorporation of language enables AllSpark to excel in few-shot classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T17:21:02Z)
• Visual Chain of Thought: Bridging Logical Gaps with Multimodal Infillings [61.04460792203266]
  We introduce VCoT, a novel method that leverages chain-of-thought prompting with vision-language grounding to bridge the logical gaps within sequential data. Our method uses visual guidance to generate synthetic multimodal infillings that add consistent and novel information to reduce the logical gaps for downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T17:58:29Z)
• Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models [94.70184390935661]
  We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T07:51:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.