Online Agent-as-a-Judge: Situation-Generating Evaluation for Interactive Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08200v1
• Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 14:37:33 GMT
• Title: Online Agent-as-a-Judge: Situation-Generating Evaluation for Interactive Agents
• Abstract summary: We propose Online Agent-as-a-Judge, a situation-generating evaluation framework for interactive social agents.<n>Online Agent-as-a-Judge deploys an in-world evaluator agent that interacts with the target agent through the environment's native dialogue and action protocol.<n>In a life-simulation environment with $32$ designer-authored social criteria, Online Agent-as-a-Judge improves criteria coverage and agreement with human labels.
• Score: 7.750851374657493
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating LLM-powered interactive social agents is challenging because socially relevant behaviors depend not only on isolated outputs, but also on prior interactions, social roles, and downstream actions. Existing methods typically allow a target agent to act freely in an environment and then score the resulting trajectory. However, this passive setup can miss capabilities that only become observable under specific social circumstances; for example, conflict handling may remain untested if no disagreement arises. We propose Online Agent-as-a-Judge, a situation-generating evaluation framework for interactive social agents. Online Agent-as-a-Judge deploys an in-world evaluator agent that interacts with the target agent through the environment's native dialogue and action protocol, actively eliciting situations relevant to the evaluation criteria. The resulting trajectories provide evidence for assessing both immediate responses and subsequent behavior. In a life-simulation environment with $32$ designer-authored social criteria, Online Agent-as-a-Judge improves criteria coverage and agreement with human labels, yielding more reliable evidence-grounded evaluations of behaviors that passive methods can leave unobserved.

Related papers

• Evaluating Generative Agents with Actions Grounded in Socially Distributed Task Environments using Incognita [0.0]
  We introduce Incognita, a framework that separates social interaction from grounded execution.<n>We evaluate three generative agent models on 18 tasks stratified by social breadth, with 540 trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T05:34:21Z)
• ALSO: Adversarial Online Strategy Optimization for Social Agents [63.84788516416339]
  We propose textbfALSO (textbfAdrial ontextbfLine textbfStrategy textbfOptimization) as the first framework for online strategy optimization in social simulation.<n> ALSO formulates multi-turn interaction as an adversarial bandit problem, where combinations of static personas and dynamic strategy instructions are treated as arms.<n>Also introduces a lightweight neural surrogate to predict rewards from interaction histories, enabling sample-efficient exploration and continuous online adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T09:25:15Z)
• Position: AI Agents Are Not (Yet) a Panacea for Social Simulation [62.891898598784415]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred growing interest in using LLM-integrated agents for social simulation.<n>This position paper argues that LLM-based agents are not (yet) a panacea for social simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:35:07Z)
• Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia [100.74015791021044]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction.<n>Existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations.<n>We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T00:11:05Z)
• The Social Laboratory: A Psychometric Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation [0.16921396880325779]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework that uses multi-agent debate as a controlled "social laboratory"<n>We show that assigned personas induce stable, measurable psychometric profiles, particularly in cognitive effort.<n>This work provides a blueprint for a new class of dynamic, psychometrically grounded evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T07:10:28Z)
• Can Agents Spontaneously Form a Society? Introducing a Novel Architecture for Generative Multi-Agents to Elicit Social Emergence [0.11249583407496219]
  We introduce a generative agent architecture called ITCMA-S, which includes a basic framework for individual agents and a framework that supports social interactions among multi-agents. This architecture enables agents to identify and filter out behaviors that are detrimental to social interactions, guiding them to choose more favorable actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T13:39:29Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narratives [89.82264844526333]
  We focus on creating agents that act in alignment with socially beneficial norms and values in interactive narratives or text-based games. We introduce the GALAD agent that uses the social commonsense knowledge present in specially trained language models to contextually restrict its action space to only those actions that are aligned with socially beneficial values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T09:54:33Z)
• Learning Goal-oriented Dialogue Policy with Opposite Agent Awareness [116.804536884437]
  We propose an opposite behavior aware framework for policy learning in goal-oriented dialogues. We estimate the opposite agent's policy from its behavior and use this estimation to improve the target agent by regarding it as part of the target policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T03:13:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.