When LLMs Invent Rust Crates: An Empirical Study of Hallucination Patterns and Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08444v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 04:17:42 GMT
• Title: When LLMs Invent Rust Crates: An Empirical Study of Hallucination Patterns and Mitigation
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have become powerful tools for code generation, yet they remain prone to hallucinations.<n>We present the first large-scale empirical study on crate hallucination in LLM-generated Rust code.<n>Our analysis reveals that, unlike prior findings in Python and JavaScript, hallucination behavior in Rust follows a distinct pattern.
• Score: 4.708039298332298
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have become powerful tools for code generation, yet they remain prone to hallucinations-producing plausible but incorrect or fabricated outputs. Among these, package hallucination, where an LLM suggests non-existent dependencies, poses an emerging security risk to the software supply chain. While previous studies focus on popular languages like Python or JavaScript, in this work we present the first large-scale empirical study on crate hallucination in LLM-generated Rust code. We construct a multi-source dataset combining coding tasks from Stack Overflow, GitHub, and LLM-generated tasks, and evaluate both commercial and open-source models under various decoding settings. Our analysis reveals that, unlike prior findings in Python and JavaScript, hallucination behavior in Rust follows a distinct pattern: different models exhibit surprisingly consistent hallucination rates, and these rates show minimal sensitivity to model parameters. Furthermore, we investigate prompt engineering strategies to mitigate hallucinations without sacrificing code quality. This study provides new insights into the reliability and security implications of LLM-assisted Rust development, offering guidance for future research and safer model deployment in software engineering workflows.

Related papers

• Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models Using Diversion Decoding [4.400358902322406]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for retrieving knowledge through seamless, human-like interactions.<n>LLMs exhibit hallucination tendencies, where they generate factually incorrect statements and fabricate knowledge, undermining their reliability and trustworthiness.<n>We introduce diversion decoding, a novel method for developing an LLM uncertainty by actively challenging model-generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T20:56:42Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review of Code Hallucinations in LLMs: Characterization, Mitigation Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions for Reliable AI [54.34738767990601]
  As Large Language Models become increasingly integrated into software engineering tasks, understanding and mitigating hallucination in code becomes essential.<n>We provide a systematic review of hallucination phenomena in code-oriented LLMs from four key perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T02:58:41Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination in VideoLLMs via Temporal-Aware Activation Engineering [83.63437999696954]
  hallucination in large language models (MLLMs) persists as a significant and under-addressed challenge in the video domain.<n>We propose a temporal-aware activation engineering framework for VideoLLMs, which adaptively identifies and manipulates hallucination-sensitive modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T08:12:06Z)
• Importing Phantoms: Measuring LLM Package Hallucination Vulnerabilities [11.868859925111561]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become an essential tool in the programmer's toolkit.<n>Their tendency to hallucinate code can be used by malicious actors to introduce vulnerabilities to broad swathes of the software supply chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T10:26:18Z)
• MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation [50.73561815838431]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit hallucination phenomena.<n>We present an empirical analysis and find that, although MLLMs incorrectly generate the objects in the final output, they are actually able to recognize visual objects in the preceding layers.<n>Motivated by this, we propose a novel dynamic correction decoding method for MLLMs DeCo, which adaptively selects the appropriate preceding layers and proportionally integrates knowledge into the final layer to adjust the output logits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T16:57:44Z)
• Collu-Bench: A Benchmark for Predicting Language Model Hallucinations in Code [20.736888384234273]
  We introduce Collu-Bench, a benchmark for predicting code hallucinations of large language models (LLMs) Collu-Bench includes 13,234 code hallucination instances collected from five datasets and 11 diverse LLMs, ranging from open-source models to commercial ones. We conduct experiments to predict hallucination on Collu-Bench, using both traditional machine learning techniques and neural networks, which achieves 22.03 -- 33.15% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T20:41:47Z)
• LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigation [33.46342144822026]
  Code generation aims to automatically generate code from input requirements, significantly enhancing development efficiency.<n>Recent large language models (LLMs) based approaches have shown promising results and revolutionized code generation task.<n>Despite the promising performance, LLMs often generate contents with hallucinations, especially for the code generation scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T17:51:15Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [92.62952504133926]
  This study evaluated the performance of three leading closed-source LLMs and six popular open-source LLMs on three commonly used benchmarks.<n>We developed a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes and analyzed the root cause for common bug types.<n>We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs [3.515912713354746]
  Package hallucinations arise from fact-conflicting errors when generating code using Large Language Models.<n>This paper conducts a rigorous and comprehensive evaluation of package hallucinations across different programming languages.<n>We show that the average percentage of hallucinated packages is at least 5.2% for commercial models and 21.7% for open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T03:29:06Z)
• Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinate [75.03210107477157]
  Large language models are known to hallucinate when faced with unfamiliar queries. We find that unfamiliar examples in the models' finetuning data are crucial in shaping these errors. Our work further investigates RL finetuning strategies for improving the factuality of long-form model generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T18:28:13Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.