Quantitative Promise Theory: Intentionality and Inference in Autonomous Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08552v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:12:44 GMT
• Title: Quantitative Promise Theory: Intentionality and Inference in Autonomous Agents
• Abstract summary: I discuss some quantitative representations of Promise Theory for processes involving autonomous agents.<n>I describe how Bayesian probability and information theoretic optimization, including Active Inference, may be incorporated with promise semantics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: I discuss some quantitative representations of Promise Theory for processes involving autonomous agents. Agent models are common in software systems, machine learning, and biology, for example, but may also apply to physics and other forms of engineering. I describe how Bayesian probability and information theoretic optimization, including Active Inference, may be incorporated with promise semantics -- as well as how Promise Theory supplements solutions, helping to avoid probability's pitfalls, which include non-local coordination, calibrating, and normalizing probabilistic computations. The role of boundary conditions in constraining allowed states and selecting decision thresholds is a form of promise, and agent alignment provides a scalable definition of intent. Autonomous agents may congeal into swarms with superagent characteristics by trying to minimize their information, despite uncertainty that works to maximize it. The use of Promise Theory involves some research challenges as well as stylistic preferences.

Related papers

• HypoAgent: An Agentic Framework for Interactive Abductive Hypothesis Generation over Knowledge Graphs [52.91976391891331]
  Abductive reasoning over knowledge graphs aims to generate logical hypotheses that explain observed entities or facts.<n>Existing controllable hypothesis generation methods allow users to guide this process with explicit conditions.<n>We propose HypoAgent, an Agentic framework for interactive abductive Hypothesis Generation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T14:40:37Z)
• Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent [92.04373485710285]
  This paper argues that coherent decision-making requires Bayesian principles at the orchestration level of the agentic system.<n>It provides examples and design patterns to illustrate how beliefs and utility-aware policies can improve agentic AI orchestration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T15:43:43Z)
• $γ(3,4)$ `Attention' in Cognitive Agents: Ontology-Free Knowledge Representations With Promise Theoretic Semantics [0.0]
  Semantic and dynamics of attention' are closely related to promise theoretic notions developed for autonomous agents.<n>One may establish a bridge between vectorized Machine Learning and Knowledge Graph representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T06:48:53Z)
• Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence: a coherent framework for multi-agent learning [57.23345786304694]
  We introduce a framework for prospective learning and embedded agency centered on self-prediction.<n>We show that in multi-agent settings, self-prediction enables agents to reason about others running similar algorithms.<n>We extend the theory of AIXI, and study universally intelligent embedded agents which start from a Solomonoff prior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T08:46:48Z)
• Intention-aware policy graphs: answering what, how, and why in opaque agents [0.1398098625978622]
  Agents are a special kind of AI-based software in that they interact in complex environments and have increased potential for emergent behaviour. We propose a Probabilistic Graphical Model along with a pipeline for designing such model. We contribute measurements that evaluate the interpretability and reliability of explanations provided. This model can be constructed by taking partial observations of the agent's actions and world states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T09:31:45Z)
• Gaussian Mixture Models for Affordance Learning using Bayesian Networks [50.18477618198277]
  Affordances are fundamental descriptors of relationships between actions, objects and effects. This paper approaches the problem of an embodied agent exploring the world and learning these affordances autonomously from its sensory experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T22:05:45Z)
• Multi-Agent Verification and Control with Probabilistic Model Checking [4.56877715768796]
  Probabilistic model checking is a technique for formal automated reasoning about software or hardware systems. It builds upon ideas and techniques from a diverse range of fields, from logic, automata and graph theory, to optimisation, numerical methods and control. In recent years, probabilistic model checking has also been extended to integrate ideas from game theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-05T09:31:32Z)
• Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Planners [85.03486419424647]
  KnowNo is a framework for measuring and aligning the uncertainty of large language models. KnowNo builds on the theory of conformal prediction to provide statistical guarantees on task completion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T21:25:12Z)
• CAMMARL: Conformal Action Modeling in Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning [5.865719902445064]
  We propose a novel multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm CAMMARL. It involves modeling the actions of other agents in different situations in the form of confident sets. We show that CAMMARL elevates the capabilities of an autonomous agent in MARL by modeling conformal prediction sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T19:03:53Z)
• Calibrating AI Models for Wireless Communications via Conformal Prediction [55.47458839587949]
  Conformal prediction is applied for the first time to the design of AI for communication systems. This paper investigates the application of conformal prediction as a general framework to obtain AI models that produce decisions with formal calibration guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T12:52:23Z)
• Decision-Making Among Bounded Rational Agents [5.24482648010213]
  We introduce the concept of bounded rationality from an information-theoretic view into the game-theoretic framework. This allows the robots to reason other agents' sub-optimal behaviors and act accordingly under their computational constraints. We demonstrate that the resulting framework allows the robots to reason about different levels of rational behaviors of other agents and compute a reasonable strategy under its computational constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T00:29:24Z)
• Path Planning Using Probability Tensor Flows [1.491819755205193]
  In this paper, probability propagation is applied to model agent's motion in potentially complex scenarios. The backward flow provides precious background information to the agent's behavior. The emerging behaviors are very realistic and demonstrate great potentials of the application of this framework to real environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T17:14:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.