Can Data Work be Reparative?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09408v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:25:35 GMT
• Title: Can Data Work be Reparative?
• Abstract summary: civic-tech initiative builds datasets for online safety systems.<n>Aim to respond to online safety concerns from a feminist perspective.<n>Trace the struggles they encounter in the process.
• Score: 10.945479770016291
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present an ethnographic study of an alternative approach to data work, developed by a civic-tech initiative that builds datasets for training and benchmarking online safety systems. They aim to respond to online safety concerns from a feminist perspective, by building safety datasets collaboratively with those most impacted by online harms. In this paper, we examine how this approach aims to reorient data work as a site for repair and redress, and trace the struggles they encounter in the process. Specifically, we draw attention to the challenges and tensions involved in advancing just reward for data work and collective governance of AI datasets. Examining these challenges through an STS-informed lens of reparative justice and repair, we argue that the work of repairing data work (and AI) lies, fundamentally, in resetting the ties of accountability. At a time heightened emphasis on efforts like safety evaluations and red teaming to make AI more responsible, we highlight the need to confront foundational questions about how the humans involved in these efforts relate to the datasets and systems they help produce. A reparative lens demands that we interrupt prevailing norms of data work and place at their centre, not AI or datasets, but those most harmed by the neglect, oversight and exclusion animated in the current modes of dataset production. This, we argue, offers a bold vision for responsibility and contributes towards a critical agenda for building alternative futures of data and AI practice.

Related papers

• From Data Heterogeneity to Convergence: A Data-Centric Review of Federated Learning [35.26793524140591]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution for data hunger in centralized learning.<n>FL enables privacy with multiple clients to train a shared-task model collaboratively without exposing their local data.<n>While being a key component in any learning system, data is also a primary source of vulnerabilities and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T09:00:04Z)
• What's the next frontier for Data-centric AI? Data Savvy Agents [71.76058707995398]
  We argue that data-savvy capabilities should be a top priority in the design of agentic systems.<n>We propose four key capabilities to realize this vision: Proactive data acquisition, Sophisticated data processing, Interactive test data synthesis, and Continual adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T17:09:29Z)
• Autonomous Data Agents: A New Opportunity for Smart Data [50.02229219403014]
  Report argues that DataAgents represent a paradigm shift toward autonomous data-to-knowledge systems.<n>DataAgents transform complex and unstructured data into coherent and actionable knowledge.<n>We first examine why the convergence of agentic AI and data-to-knowledge systems has emerged as a critical trend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T06:46:41Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• From Incidents to Insights: Patterns of Responsibility following AI Harms [1.9389881806157316]
  The AI Incident Database was inspired by aviation safety databases, which enable collective learning from failures to prevent future incidents.<n>The database documents hundreds of AI failures, collected from the news and media.<n>We argue that by looking beyond technically-focused learning, the dataset can provide new, highly valuable insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T09:59:36Z)
• Towards Data Governance of Frontier AI Models [0.0]
  We look at how data can enable new governance capacities for frontier AI models.<n>Data is non-rival, often non-excludable, easily replicable, and increasingly synthesizable.<n>We propose a set of policy mechanisms targeting key actors along the data supply chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T02:37:51Z)
• Building Better Datasets: Seven Recommendations for Responsible Design from Dataset Creators [0.5755004576310334]
  We interviewed 18 leading dataset creators about the current state of the field. We shed light on the challenges and considerations faced by dataset creators. We share seven central recommendations for improving responsible dataset creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T20:52:19Z)
• On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms [56.119374302685934]
  There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development. We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z)
• Data-centric AI: Perspectives and Challenges [51.70828802140165]
  Data-centric AI (DCAI) advocates a fundamental shift from model advancements to ensuring data quality and reliability. We bring together three general missions: training data development, inference data development, and data maintenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T05:28:59Z)
• Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses [150.64470864162556]
  This work systematically categorizes and discusses a wide range of dataset vulnerabilities and exploits. In addition to describing various poisoning and backdoor threat models and the relationships among them, we develop their unified taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T22:38:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.