Human-AI Coordination Zones: A Framework for Designing Human-in-the-Loop Experiences with Agentic AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09848v1
• Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 01:03:08 GMT
• Title: Human-AI Coordination Zones: A Framework for Designing Human-in-the-Loop Experiences with Agentic AI
• Abstract summary: We introduce a framework defining human-AI coordination as the interplay of three dimensions.<n>We contribute mid-level tools including coordination zones, an input taxonomy, and design patterns.<n>The framework can be applied generatively to design experiences, analytically to evaluate existing ones, and communicatively to articulate ideas across stakeholders.
• Score: 6.1337557618676195
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: As generative and agentic AI becomes embedded in everyday products, practitioners face a persistent challenge: how to design human-AI coordination -- the ongoing mutual adjustment between users and AI systems as mediate through interfaces-that supports usability, trust, and safety. Existing resources offer high-level principles ("be transparent," "maintain user control") or low-level UI patterns, but there is a lack of mid-level design knowledge bridging the two. Through landscape and artifact analysis of 60 commercial AI applications, we introduce a framework defining human-AI coordination as the interplay of three dimensions: salience (how prominently AI is presented), involvement (what users can do to engage AI), and activity (what AI actually does). We contribute mid-level tools including coordination zones (done-for-me, done-under-me, done-with-me, done-without-me), an input taxonomy (prompted, sparked, inferred, layered), coordination curves for mapping user journeys, and design patterns demonstrating the generative capacity of the framework. The framework can be applied generatively to design experiences, analytically to evaluate existing ones, and communicatively to articulate ideas across stakeholders.

Related papers

• AI as Teammate or Tool? A Review of Human-AI Interaction in Decision Support [0.514825619161626]
  Current AI systems remain largely passive due to an overreliance on explainability-centric designs.<n> transitioning AI to an active teammate requires adaptive, context-aware interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T19:18:50Z)
• The Workflow as Medium: A Framework for Navigating Human-AI Co-Creation [0.0]
  The Creative Intelligence Loop (CIL) is a novel socio-technical framework for responsible human-AI co-creation.<n>The CIL proposes a disciplined structure for dynamic human-AI collaboration, guiding the strategic integration of diverse AI teammates.<n>The CIL was empirically demonstrated through the practice-led creation of two graphic novellas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T20:36:13Z)
• ADEPTS: A Capability Framework for Human-Centered Agent Design [16.17708866196561]
  We introduce ADEPTS, a capability framework defining a set of core user-facing capabilities for AI agents.<n>We aim to condense complex AI-UX requirements into a compact framework that is actionable guidance for AI researchers, designers, engineers, and policy reviewers alike.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T22:27:40Z)
• Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI [0.36868085124383626]
  Review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding.<n> Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational interaction.<n>Agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:00:21Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• The AI Interface: Designing for the Ideal Machine-Human Experience (Editorial) [1.8074330674710588]
  This editorial introduces a Special Issue that explores the psychology of AI experience design.<n>Papers in this collection highlight the complexities of trust, transparency, and emotional sensitivity in human-AI interaction.<n>By findings from eight diverse studies, this editorial underscores the need for AI interfaces to balance efficiency with empathy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T15:17:32Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
  We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike. We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignment [30.599781014726823]
  Modern AI enables a high-level, declarative form of interaction. Users describe the intended outcome they wish an AI to produce, but do not actually create the outcome themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T14:33:11Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.