Mult-DPO: Multinomial Direct Preference Optimization for Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10078v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:53:45 GMT
• Title: Mult-DPO: Multinomial Direct Preference Optimization for Recommender Systems
• Abstract summary: Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a simple and effective alignment strategy for large language models (LLMs) based on pairwise preferences.<n>In recommender systems, however, user feedback is rarely pairwise.<n>We propose Mult-DPO, a tractable multinomial surrogate likelihood over set-wise preference events for the user-preference alignment of LLM-based recommender systems.
• Score: 72.27018654934386
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a simple and effective alignment strategy for large language models (LLMs) based on pairwise preferences. In recommender systems, however, user feedback is rarely pairwise. For a given context, e.g., a user, a session, or a conversation, we typically observe set-wise preferences with multiple positive items, where every positive item should outrank every unobserved or explicitly negative item, with no prescribed order among the positives or the negatives themselves. A natural generalization is to use the Plackett-Luce (PL) reward model, which extends the Bradley-Terry reward model underlying vanilla DPO from pairwise preferences to full rankings of candidates. However, we show that adapting the PL model to set-wise preferences requires marginalizing over all positive orderings, where the resulting expression is combinatorial in complexity. To address this fundamental challenge, we propose Mult-DPO, a novel DPO objective with a tractable multinomial surrogate likelihood over set-wise preference events for the user-preference alignment of LLM-based recommender systems. The multinomial construction is not itself a ranking distribution, but it is defined on the same reward-induced weight space and admits a closed-form DPO-style objective, enabling direct alignment of LLMs with multiple candidates through a classification-style objective. In addition, we prove that the multinomial DPO loss is a tractable upper bound on the marginalized PL DPO loss when optimizing against the set-wise preference data. We further characterize the tightness of this bound in terms of the relative total weight of positives versus negatives, which provides insights into tightening the bound with richer or harder negatives. Finally, we extend Mult-DPO to the alignment of LLMs with multiple preference levels. Code is available at https://github.com/yaochenzhu/Mult_DPO

Related papers

• MASS-DPO: Multi-negative Active Sample Selection for Direct Policy Optimization [66.81594613265833]
  Multi-negative preference optimization under the Plackett--Luce (PL) model extends Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)<n>We introduce MASS-DPO, a multi-negative active sample selection method that derives a PL-specific Fisher-information objective for selecting compact, informative negative subsets within each prompt.<n> MASS-DPO consistently exceeds or matches existing methods in accuracy, improves Recall/NDCG and margin-based optimization dynamics, and delivers stronger alignment with substantially fewer negatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T16:18:08Z)
• HiPO: Hierarchical Preference Optimization for Adaptive Reasoning in LLMs [2.497936211748472]
  We propose HiPO, an extension of DPO that separates responses into segments and computes loss as a weighted sum of the DPO loss for each segment.<n>Our approach enables segment-specific training while maintaining DPO's computational efficiency and training stability.<n>We demonstrate that for multiple 7B LLMs fine-tuned using HiPO and DPO on the Math Stack Exchange preference dataset, the models trained with HiPO outperform the others on a variety of common math benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T03:08:30Z)
• In-context Ranking Preference Optimization [65.5489745857577]
  We propose an In-context Ranking Preference Optimization (IRPO) framework to optimize large language models (LLMs) based on ranking lists constructed during inference.<n>We show IRPO outperforms standard DPO approaches in ranking performance, highlighting its effectiveness in aligning LLMs with direct in-context ranking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:06:12Z)
• Multi-Preference Optimization: Generalizing DPO via Set-Level Contrasts [17.243429150450886]
  We propose $textbfMulti-Preference Optimization (MPO) to optimize over entire sets of responses.<n>MPO employs deviation-based weighting, which emphasizes outlier responses that deviate most from the mean reward.<n>We theoretically prove that MPO reduces alignment bias at a rate of $mathcalOleft(frac1sqrtnright)$ with respect to the number of responses per query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T21:50:22Z)
• TPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Multi-branch & Multi-step Preference Trees [19.99934360969673]
  We introduce Tree Preference Optimization (TPO), that does not sample paired preference responses from the preference tree.<n>TPO formulates the language model alignment as a Preference List Ranking problem.<n>The experimental results indicate that TPO consistently outperforms DPO across five public large language models on four datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T22:22:05Z)
• On Softmax Direct Preference Optimization for Recommendation [50.896117978746]
  We propose Softmax-DPO (S-DPO) to instill ranking information into the LM to help LM-based recommenders distinguish preferred items from negatives. Specifically, we incorporate multiple negatives in user preference data and devise an alternative version of DPO loss tailored for LM-based recommenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T15:16:11Z)
• Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization [105.3612692153615]
  We propose a new axis based on eliciting preferences jointly over instruction-response pairs.<n>Joint preferences over instruction and response pairs can significantly enhance the alignment of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T02:05:40Z)
• Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts [95.09994361995389]
  Relative Preference Optimization (RPO) is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts. RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align large language models with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T22:47:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.