VeriSpace: Spatially Grounded Action Verification for Vision-Language-Action Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10568v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:31:59 GMT
• Title: VeriSpace: Spatially Grounded Action Verification for Vision-Language-Action Models
• Abstract summary: Vision-Ground-action (VLA) models have shown strong promise for robotic manipulation.<n>But their reliability at test time remains limited by one-shot action prediction.<n>We present VeriSpace, a 3D-aware verifier for test-time action selection in VLA systems.
• Score: 19.75611749501909
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown strong promise for robotic manipulation, but their reliability at test time remains limited by one-shot action prediction, where even small action errors can cause grasp failure, collision, or incorrect task progression. A natural alternative is to equip VLA systems with test-time verification, allowing multiple candidate actions to be proposed and evaluated before execution. However, reliable action verification is challenging because it requires not only distinguishing subtle geometric differences between candidate actions, but also assessing whether an action makes meaningful progress toward the task goal. We present VeriSpace, a 3D-aware action verifier for test-time action selection in VLA systems. VeriSpace evaluates candidate actions through two key components: Dual-Path 3D-Injected Scene Encoding, which constructs a scene representation that jointly preserves visual semantics and explicit 3D geometry, and Spatially-Grounded Action Reasoning, which evaluates each action by reasoning over task-relevant spatial relations, geometric validity, and expected goal progress. Together, these components enable more reliable discrimination between subtle yet outcome-critical action candidates while remaining fully compatible with existing VLA policies. Experiments on public benchmarks and real-world robotic manipulation tasks show that VeriSpace consistently improves decision reliability over both underlying VLA policies and prior verification-based methods, yielding substantial gains in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings.

Related papers

• VLA-Corrector: Stage-Aware Observable State Understanding for Prompt-Based Closed-Loop Recovery of Vision-Language-Action Policies [12.698552476812855]
  Long-horizon robot manipulation with Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies remains vulnerable to execution-time deviations.<n>We introduce a stage-aware failure verification and Prompt Recovery framework that enables closed-loop correction of a fixed VLA policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T09:50:30Z)
• CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation [10.221757123615786]
  Vision-language navigation (VLN) has recently advanced with large language and multimodal models, enabling agents to follow natural-language instructions in unseen environments without training a task-specific navigation policy.<n>Most existing VLN methods rely on an open-loop decision-execution approach, where candidate actions are generated from instructions and observations but are rarely verified or corrected before execution.<n>We propose Closed-loop Self-verified Retrieval-augmented Reasoning (CLOSER), a training-policy-free method that sequentially performs action reasoning, reliability verification, targeted retrieval, and action correction in a closed-loop manner before executing concrete
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T05:57:42Z)
• SpatialClaw: Rethinking Action Interface for Agentic Spatial Reasoning [99.49739831030388]
  We study how the design of this interface shapes the agent's capacity for open-ended spatial reasoning.<n>We propose SpatialClaw, a training-free framework for spatial reasoning that adopts code as the action interface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T17:59:36Z)
• What to Test Next: Interpretable Coverage Gap Discovery in Driving VLMs [52.50210189669399]
  Driving vision-language models (VLMs) must accurately understand scenes across diverse conditions defined by Operational Design Domains (ODDs)<n>We propose SliceScorer, a deterministic scoring rule for missing-slice recommendation.<n>We show that SliceNav surfaces high-risk coverage gaps more effectively than prior slice-discovery methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:18:01Z)
• Guide, Think, Act: Interactive Embodied Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models [15.486973209713954]
  GTA-VLA(Guide, Think, Act) is an interactive Vision-Language-Action framework.<n>It enables spatially steerable embodied reasoning by allowing users to guide robot policies with explicit visual cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T14:58:29Z)
• Dynamic Execution Commitment of Vision-Language-Action Models [21.647844049489535]
  We introduce A3, an Adaptive Action Acceptance mechanism that reframes dynamic execution commitment as a self-speculative prefix verification problem.<n>A3 first computes a trajectory-wise consensus score of actions via group sampling, then selects a representative draft and prioritizes downstream verification.<n> Experiments across diverse VLA models and benchmarks demonstrate that A3 eliminates the need for manual horizon tuning while achieving a superior trade-off between execution and inference throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T05:52:58Z)
• ActiveVLA: Injecting Active Perception into Vision-Language-Action Models for Precise 3D Robotic Manipulation [52.94334113271359]
  ActiveVLA is a vision-language-action framework that empowers robots with active perception capabilities for high-precision, fine-grained manipulation.<n>We show that ActiveVLA achieves precise 3D manipulation and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on three simulation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T08:29:07Z)
• PosA-VLA: Enhancing Action Generation via Pose-Conditioned Anchor Attention [92.85371254435074]
  PosA-VLA framework anchors visual attention via pose-conditioned supervision, consistently guiding the model's perception toward task-relevant regions.<n>We show that our method executes embodied tasks with precise and time-efficient behavior across diverse robotic manipulation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T12:14:29Z)
• Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modeling [10.358293338390716]
  Action Effect Modeling (AEM) is a unified framework that captures action execution and its outcomes through a probabilistic formulation.<n>AEM identifies the outcome of an action by selecting the most informative effect frame based on semantic relevance and visual quality.<n>It then extracts complementary cues from visual grounding and symbolic scene graphs, aligning them in a shared latent space to form robust effect-aware representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T05:56:17Z)
• Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible [53.40183895299108]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance on a range of robotic tasks.<n>We propose Instruct-Verify-and-Act (IVA), a framework that detects when an instruction cannot be executed due to a false premise.<n>Our experiments show that IVA improves false premise detection accuracy by 97.56% over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:54:33Z)
• Bidirectional Decoding: Improving Action Chunking via Guided Test-Time Sampling [51.38330727868982]
  We show how action chunking impacts the divergence between a learner and a demonstrator.<n>We propose Bidirectional Decoding (BID), a test-time inference algorithm that bridges action chunking with closed-loop adaptation.<n>Our method boosts the performance of two state-of-the-art generative policies across seven simulation benchmarks and two real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T15:39:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.