An Ethical eValuation Agent (EeVA): Results of a Proof-of-Concept Test on a Prototype Agentic-like Workflow to Assist Ethical Deliberations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11218v1
• Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 13:23:15 GMT
• Title: An Ethical eValuation Agent (EeVA): Results of a Proof-of-Concept Test on a Prototype Agentic-like Workflow to Assist Ethical Deliberations
• Abstract summary: EeVA supports comparative ethical reflection rather than delivering definitive ethical answers.<n>It evaluated uploaded use cases against 10 ethical frameworks.<n>It produced consistently structured framework evaluations and integrated syntheses.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Ethical deliberation is often misunderstood as a search for single right or wrong answers, creating difficulties for non-ethically trained personnel who must address ethically laden challenges. We developed EeVA, an agentic-like LLM-based workflow designed to support comparative ethical reflection rather than deliver definitive ethical answers. EeVA was programmed in n8n using three interconnected workflows: starter, worker, and emitter. It evaluated uploaded use cases against 10 ethical frameworks through evaluator and synthesis prompts. Proof-of-concept testing used three published cases from urban mobility, peer-to-peer energy trading, and social-service resource allocation. Across all cases, EeVA produced consistently structured framework-specific evaluations and integrated syntheses. Outputs differentiated between frameworks, identified convergences and divergences, recommended modifications to increase alignment, and highlighted persistent ethical tensions. Syntheses were readable for non-specialists and shifted attention away from simplistic answers toward design conditions, safeguards, and areas where full cross-framework agreement was unlikely. The findings suggest that LLMs can be organised into usable workflows that preserve ethical plurality while helping bridge the communicative gap between ethicists and non-ethically trained personnel. EeVA's value lies not in replacing ethicists or resolving moral disagreement, but in scaffolding structured ethical deliberation. EeVA offers a promising proof of concept for supporting ethical reflection where access to ethics expertise is limited. Further work is needed on reproducibility, human evaluation, user testing, and efficiency before it can be considered a mature tool.

Related papers

• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• Advancing Automated Ethical Profiling in SE: a Zero-Shot Evaluation of LLM Reasoning [1.389448546196977]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into software engineering (SE) tools for tasks that extend beyond code synthesis.<n>We present a fully automated framework for assessing ethical reasoning capabilities across 16 LLMs in a zero-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T13:28:26Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Addressing Moral Uncertainty using Large Language Models for Ethical Decision-Making [0.42481744176244507]
  We present an ethical decision-making framework that refines a pre-trained reinforcement learning (RL) model using a task-agnostic ethical layer.<n>An ethical layer aggregates belief scores from multiple moral perspectives using Belief Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Dempster-Shafer Theory into probability scores that also serve as the shaping reward.<n>This integrated learning framework helps the RL agent navigate moral uncertainty in complex environments and enables it to make morally sound decisions across diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T19:05:55Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Ethical-Lens: Curbing Malicious Usages of Open-Source Text-to-Image Models [51.69735366140249]
  We introduce Ethical-Lens, a framework designed to facilitate the value-aligned usage of text-to-image tools.<n>Ethical-Lens ensures value alignment in text-to-image models across toxicity and bias dimensions.<n>Our experiments reveal that Ethical-Lens enhances alignment capabilities to levels comparable with or superior to commercial models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T11:38:25Z)
• EALM: Introducing Multidimensional Ethical Alignment in Conversational Information Retrieval [43.72331337131317]
  We introduce a workflow that integrates ethical alignment with an initial ethical judgment stage for efficient data screening. We present the QA-ETHICS dataset adapted from the ETHICS benchmark, which serves as an evaluation tool by unifying scenarios and label meanings. In addition, we suggest a new approach that achieves top performance in both binary and multi-label ethical judgment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:22:34Z)
• Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AI [0.0]
  We argue that ethics-based auditing can improve the quality of decision making, increase user satisfaction, unlock growth potential, enable law-making, and relieve human suffering. To be feasible and effective, ethics-based auditing should take the form of a continuous and constructive process, approach ethical alignment from a system perspective, and be aligned with public policies and incentives for ethically desirable behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T11:39:40Z)
• Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotes [72.64975113835018]
  Motivated by descriptive ethics, we investigate a novel, data-driven approach to machine ethics. We introduce Scruples, the first large-scale dataset with 625,000 ethical judgments over 32,000 real-life anecdotes. Our dataset presents a major challenge to state-of-the-art neural language models, leaving significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:34:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.