The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11470v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:59:37 GMT
• Title: The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes
• Abstract summary: This survey provides a systematic analysis of more than 300 recent papers from arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, Papers with Code, and the ACL Anthology.<n>We introduce a structured taxonomy of reasoning research, covering Chain-of-Thought reasoning, multi-hop reasoning, mathematical reasoning, common sense reasoning, visual and temporal reasoning, code and algorithmic reasoning, retrieval-augmented reasoning, tool-augmented and agentic reasoning, and reinforcement learning-based reasoning.<n>We synthesize recurring limitations and failure modes, such as reasoning hallucinations, brittle multi-step inference, weak causal abstraction, and poor cross
• Score: 55.42597391158023
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across natural language processing tasks, yet reliable reasoning remains an open challenge. Although modern LLMs show progress in structured inference, multi-step problem solving, and contextual understanding, their reasoning behavior is often inconsistent and sensitive to prompting strategies, task design, and model scale. This survey provides a systematic analysis of more than 300 recent papers from arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, Papers with Code, and the ACL Anthology to examine how reasoning capabilities emerge in LLMs and where they fail. We make three main contributions. First, we introduce a structured taxonomy of LLM reasoning research, covering Chain-of-Thought reasoning, multi-hop reasoning, mathematical reasoning, common sense reasoning, visual and temporal reasoning, code and algorithmic reasoning, retrieval-augmented reasoning, tool-augmented and agentic reasoning, and reinforcement learning-based reasoning. Second, we analyze methodological trends across these paradigms, including prompting methods, model architectures, training objectives, reward modeling, and evaluation benchmarks. Third, we synthesize recurring limitations and failure modes, such as reasoning hallucinations, brittle multi-step inference, weak causal abstraction, and poor cross-domain generalization. By organizing a rapidly expanding literature, this survey offers a unified view of the current capabilities and limitations of reasoning in LLMs. We also identify emerging research directions, including meta-reasoning, self-evolving reasoning frameworks, multimodal reasoning, and socially grounded reasoning. Overall, this work aims to serve as a reference for developing more robust, interpretable, and generalizable reasoning systems in future language models.

Related papers

• Wiring the 'Why': A Unified Taxonomy and Survey of Abductive Reasoning in LLMs [6.369429101077227]
  This paper presents the first survey of abductive reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>To address the widespread conceptual confusion and synthesizing task definitions prevalent in the field, we establish a unified two-stage definition that formally categorizes prior work.<n>We present a comprehensive taxonomy of the literature, categorizing prior work based on their abductive tasks, datasets, underlying methodologies, and evaluation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T09:16:00Z)
• Large Language Model Reasoning Failures [3.139060394530521]
  We present the first comprehensive survey dedicated to reasoning failures in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce a novel categorization framework that distinguishes reasoning into embodied and non-embodied types.<n>For each reasoning failure, we provide a clear definition, analyze existing studies, explore root causes, and present mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T20:29:26Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• On the Eligibility of LLMs for Counterfactual Reasoning: A Decompositional Study [15.617243755155686]
  Counterfactual reasoning has emerged as a crucial technique for generalizing the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose a decompositional strategy that breaks down the counterfactual generation from causality construction to the reasoning over counterfactual interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T04:59:32Z)
• Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models [79.52467430114805]
  Reasoning lies at the heart of intelligence, shaping the ability to make decisions, draw conclusions, and generalize across domains.<n>In artificial intelligence, as systems increasingly operate in open, uncertain, and multimodal environments, reasoning becomes essential for enabling robust and adaptive behavior.<n>Large Multimodal Reasoning Models (LMRMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm, integrating modalities such as text, images, audio, and video to support complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T03:35:23Z)
• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.<n>This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Inductive, Abductive and Deductive Logical Inferences in LLM Reasoning [74.0242521818214]
  This paper systematically investigates the comparative dynamics of inductive (System 1) versus abductive/deductive (System 2) inference in large language models (LLMs)<n>We utilize a controlled analogical reasoning environment, varying modality (textual, visual, symbolic), difficulty, and task format (MCQ / free-text)<n>Our analysis reveals System 2 pipelines generally excel, particularly in visual/symbolic modalities and harder tasks, while System 1 is competitive for textual and easier problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey [17.06712393613964]
  This survey synthesizes recent advancements in logical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>It outlines the scope of logical reasoning in LLMs, its theoretical foundations, and the benchmarks used to evaluate reasoning proficiency.<n>The review concludes with future directions, emphasizing the need for further exploration to strengthen logical reasoning in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T09:19:14Z)
• Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded remarkably in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.<n>Their ability to perform complex reasoning-spanning logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, commonsense inference, and multi-step reasoning-often falls short of human expectations.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of emerging techniques enhancing reasoning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T23:31:39Z)
• Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning [52.83539473110143]
  We introduce a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help Large Language Models (LLMs) better understand a question. To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA) Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:30:33Z)
• Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models [56.34029644009297]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to overcome various limitations of formal Knowledge Representation (KR) systems. LLMs excel most in abductive reasoning, followed by deductive reasoning, while they are least effective at inductive reasoning. We study single-task training, multi-task training, and "chain-of-thought" knowledge distillation fine-tuning technique to assess the performance of model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T01:00:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.