MedCTA: A Benchmark for Clinical Tool Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11702v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:26:52 GMT
• Title: MedCTA: A Benchmark for Clinical Tool Agents
• Abstract summary: We introduce MedCTA, a benchmark for evaluating medical tool agents on clinician-validated, step-implicit tasks.<n>MedCTA comprises 107 real-world clinical tasks with clinician-verified executable trajectories over 5 deployed tools.<n>We benchmark 18 open- and closed-source multimodal models and find that even frontier systems remain brittle in multi-step clinical tool use.
• Score: 47.47354499871572
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: To make clinically grounded decisions, medical AI agents are expected to go beyond simple recognition and be capable of tool retrieval, evidence acquisition, and integration. Existing benchmarks largely evaluate isolated perception or single-turn question answering, and therefore provide limited visibility into failures of planning, tool recruitment, and rollout reliability. We introduce MedCTA, a benchmark for evaluating medical tool agents on clinician-validated, step-implicit tasks grounded in realistic multimodal clinical inputs, including radiology images, pathology slides, and reports. MedCTA comprises 107 real-world clinical tasks with clinician-verified executable trajectories over 5 deployed tools, and supports process-aware evaluation of tool selection, argument validity, execution stability, trajectory fidelity, and outcome quality. We benchmark 18 open- and closed-source multimodal models and find that even frontier systems remain brittle in multi-step clinical tool use: autonomous rollouts are dominated by protocol failures, premature stopping, and incorrect tool recruitment, while gold-standard tool routing yields large but still incomplete gains. These results show that strong backbone perception does not translate into reliable agentic behavior in clinical settings. MedCTA provides a rigorous testbed for auditing, diagnosing, and advancing trustworthy medical AI agents. The dataset and evaluation suite are available at https://ivul-kaust.github.io/MedCTA/

Related papers

• Agentic AI in medicine: architectures, applications, evaluation, and challenges for clinical translation [16.678400738326236]
  The scope of agentic AI in medicine remains unsettled, and current evaluation practices are not yet aligned with the requirements of clinical use.<n>We conducted a scoping review with systematic evidence mapping across five electronic sources, screened 1,649 exportable records, and provisionally included 557 unique studies.<n>The included studies describe single agents that use external tools, supported by retrieval and external knowledge, multimodal agents, and multi-agent systems applied to medical question answering, image interpretation, electronic health record analysis, drug safety, and clinical trial prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T09:25:25Z)
• Evolving Medical Imaging Agents via Experience-driven Self-skill Discovery [26.23353599153354]
  MACRO is a self-evolving, experience-augmented medical agent that shifts from static tool composition to experience-driven tool discovery.<n>A lightweight image-feature memory grounds tool selection in a visual-clinical context, while a GRPO-like training loop reinforces reliable invocation of discovered composites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T03:34:47Z)
• MedScope: Incentivizing "Think with Videos" for Clinical Reasoning via Coarse-to-Fine Tool Calling [51.31633278218137]
  MedScope is a tool-using clinical video reasoning model that performs coarse-to-fine evidence seeking over long-form procedures.<n>We build ClinVideoSuite, an evidence-centric, fine-grained clinical video suite.<n>On full and fine-grained video understanding benchmarks, MedScope achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T09:47:02Z)
• EvoClinician: A Self-Evolving Agent for Multi-Turn Medical Diagnosis via Test-Time Evolutionary Learning [72.70291772077738]
  We propose Med-Inquire, a new benchmark designed to evaluate an agent's ability to perform multi-turn diagnosis.<n>We then introduce EvoClinician, a self-evolving agent that learns efficient diagnostic strategies at test time.<n>Our experiments show EvoClinician outperforms continual learning baselines and other self-evolving agents like memory agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T13:26:18Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• Generalist Large Language Models Outperform Clinical Tools on Medical Benchmarks [1.2773749417703923]
  Generalist models consistently outperformed clinical tools.<n>OpenEvidence and UpToDate Expert AI demonstrated deficits in completeness, communication quality, context awareness, and systems-based safety reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T02:14:43Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• MedBrowseComp: Benchmarking Medical Deep Research and Computer Use [10.565661515629412]
  MedBrowseComp is a benchmark that systematically tests an agent's ability to retrieve and synthesize medical facts.<n>It contains more than 1,000 human-curated questions that mirror clinical scenarios.<n>Applying MedBrowseComp to frontier agentic systems reveals performance shortfalls as low as ten percent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T22:42:33Z)
• ReflecTool: Towards Reflection-Aware Tool-Augmented Clinical Agents [22.596827147978598]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising potential in the medical domain.<n>ClinicalAgent Bench(CAB) is a comprehensive medical agent benchmark consisting of 18 tasks across five key realistic clinical dimensions.<n> ReflecTool is a novel framework that excels at utilizing domain-specific tools within two stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T08:19:18Z)
• AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments [2.567146936147657]
  We introduce AgentClinic, a multimodal agent benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLM) in simulated clinical environments.<n>We find that solving MedQA problems in the sequential decision-making format of AgentClinic is considerably more challenging, resulting in diagnostic accuracies that can drop to below a tenth of the original accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T17:38:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.