Reliable Error Estimation for PINNs: Lower and Upper A Posteriori Bounds
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12050v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:15:32 GMT
- Title: Reliable Error Estimation for PINNs: Lower and Upper A Posteriori Bounds
- Abstract summary: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) combine machine learning with physical laws to solve differential equations.<n>We derive computable empha posteriori lower bounds for PINN errors in ordinary differential equations on suitable certified state-space domains.<n>The resulting bounds depend only on the neural-network approximation, the ODE residual, and local monotonicity and growth constants.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) combine machine learning with physical laws to solve differential equations. While existing results provide rigorous \emph{a posteriori} upper bounds for PINN prediction errors, complete certification also requires complementary lower information in order to obtain computable two-sided error enclosures. In this paper, we derive computable \emph{a posteriori} lower bounds for PINN errors in ordinary differential equations on suitable certified state-space domains under a localized strong monotonicity condition. We combine these estimates with complementary localized upper bounds under a one-sided Lipschitz condition, which is weaker than the global Lipschitz assumption used in previous work and can yield sharper upper error bands. The resulting bounds depend only on the neural-network approximation, the ODE residual, and local monotonicity and growth constants, and therefore do not require access to the exact solution. For linear time-invariant and time-varying systems, we further derive explicit formulas in terms of the minimal and maximal eigenvalues of the symmetric part of the system matrix. We also discuss the distinction between soft and hard enforcement of initial conditions in PINNs and explain why exact enforcement can make the scalar lower certificate uninformative. To recover nontrivial lower information in the linear setting, we use a signed-residual finite-probe certificate based on coordinate unit vectors. We also formulate a certificate-informed training strategy in which the propagated upper certificate is used as an auxiliary regularizer, while lower certificates remain post-training diagnostics. Altogether, the proposed framework provides rigorous and practically computable error certificates for PINN approximations of ODEs, while making explicit the domains and model classes for which the assumptions can be verified.
Related papers
- Certified and accurate computation of function space norms of deep neural networks [0.547472179735134]
We present a framework for the computation of integral quantities of neural networks, including Lebesgue and Sobolev norms.<n>We compute guaranteed lower and upper bounds for function values and derivatives, and propagate these local certificates to global lower and upper bounds for the target integrals.<n>We show how these ingredients lead to practical certified bounds for PINN interior residuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-06T16:08:16Z) - Variationally correct operator learning: Reduced basis neural operator with a posteriori error estimation [3.8135482236014133]
Minimizing PDE-residual losses is a common strategy to promote physical consistency in neural operators.<n>This work develops a variationally correct operator learning framework by constructing first-order system least-squares (FOSLS) objectives.<n>We provide a rigorous convergence analysis that bounds the total error by the sum of finite element discretization bias, reduced basis truncation error, neural network approximation error, and statistical estimation errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-24T18:37:59Z) - Lipschitz-Based Robustness Certification for Recurrent Neural Networks via Convex Relaxation [0.0]
We present RNN-SDP, a relaxation based method that models the RNN's layer interactions as a convex problem.<n>We also explore an extension that incorporates known input constraints to further tighten the resulting Lipschitz bounds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T15:26:46Z) - Stable Nonconvex-Nonconcave Training via Linear Interpolation [51.668052890249726]
This paper presents a theoretical analysis of linearahead as a principled method for stabilizing (large-scale) neural network training.
We argue that instabilities in the optimization process are often caused by the nonmonotonicity of the loss landscape and show how linear can help by leveraging the theory of nonexpansive operators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T12:45:12Z) - Benign Overfitting in Deep Neural Networks under Lazy Training [72.28294823115502]
We show that when the data distribution is well-separated, DNNs can achieve Bayes-optimal test error for classification.
Our results indicate that interpolating with smoother functions leads to better generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T19:37:44Z) - Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks [25.712851771991218]
We introduce $partial$-CROWN: a general, efficient and scalable post-training framework to bound PINN residual errors.
We demonstrate its effectiveness in obtaining certificates tight by applying it to two classically studied PINNs and two more challenging ones with real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T12:19:43Z) - Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regression [60.08422051718195]
Even simple methods like least squares can exhibit non-normal behavior when data is collected in an adaptive manner.
We propose a family of online debiasing estimators to correct these distributional anomalies in at least squares estimation.
We demonstrate the usefulness of our theory via applications to multi-armed bandit, autoregressive time series estimation, and active learning with exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T21:05:11Z) - Robust Implicit Networks via Non-Euclidean Contractions [63.91638306025768]
Implicit neural networks show improved accuracy and significant reduction in memory consumption.
They can suffer from ill-posedness and convergence instability.
This paper provides a new framework to design well-posed and robust implicit neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-06T18:05:02Z) - Amortized Conditional Normalized Maximum Likelihood: Reliable Out of
Distribution Uncertainty Estimation [99.92568326314667]
We propose the amortized conditional normalized maximum likelihood (ACNML) method as a scalable general-purpose approach for uncertainty estimation.
Our algorithm builds on the conditional normalized maximum likelihood (CNML) coding scheme, which has minimax optimal properties according to the minimum description length principle.
We demonstrate that ACNML compares favorably to a number of prior techniques for uncertainty estimation in terms of calibration on out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-05T08:04:34Z) - Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable
Neural Distribution Alignment [52.02794488304448]
We propose a new distribution alignment method based on a log-likelihood ratio statistic and normalizing flows.
We experimentally verify that minimizing the resulting objective results in domain alignment that preserves the local structure of input domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-26T22:10:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.