Finding Multiple Interpretations in Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12277v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:17:48 GMT
• Title: Finding Multiple Interpretations in Datasets
• Abstract summary: We show that the proposed method finds multiple models with highly different gene expressions than those found by the control methodology without performance penalties.<n>We argue that the proposed methodology is important whenever one aims to analyze any global characteristic of a model to extract insight into the underlying phenomenon being studied.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we propose an approach to finding sets of similar-performing models (in terms of loss/accuracy measurements) with highly different context-aware characteristics. Through experiments on the METABRIC dataset, we show that the proposed method finds multiple models with highly different gene expressions than those found by the control methodology without performance penalties. We argue that the proposed methodology is important whenever one aims to analyze any global characteristic of a model to extract insight into the underlying phenomenon being studied.

Related papers

• CLIP Meets Diffusion: A Synergistic Approach to Anomaly Detection [49.11819337853632]
  Anomaly detection is a complex problem due to the ambiguity in defining anomalies, the diversity of anomaly types, and the scarcity of training data.<n>We propose CLIPfusion, a method that leverages both discriminative and generative foundation models.<n>We believe that our method underscores the effectiveness of multi-modal and multi-model fusion in tackling the multifaceted challenges of anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:30:15Z)
• DISCO: DISCovering Overfittings as Causal Rules for Text Classification Models [6.369258625916601]
  Post-hoc interpretability methods fail to capture the models' decision-making process fully. Our paper introduces DISCO, a novel method for discovering global, rule-based explanations. DISCO supports interactive explanations, enabling human inspectors to distinguish spurious causes in the rule-based output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T12:12:44Z)
• Out-of-Distribution Detection via Deep Multi-Comprehension Ensemble [11.542472900306745]
  Multi-Comprehension (MC) Ensemble is proposed as a strategy to augment the Out-of-Distribution (OOD) feature representation field. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the MC Ensemble strategy in OOD detection. This underscores the effectiveness of our proposed approach in enhancing the model's capability to detect instances outside its training distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T18:43:04Z)
• Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective [7.577040836988683]
  Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:16:24Z)
• Exploration of the Rashomon Set Assists Trustworthy Explanations for Medical Data [4.499833362998488]
  This paper introduces a novel process to explore models in the Rashomon set, extending the conventional modeling approach. We propose the $textttRashomon_DETECT$ algorithm to detect models with different behavior. To quantify differences in variable effects among models, we introduce the Profile Disparity Index (PDI) based on measures from functional data analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T13:53:43Z)
• Ensemble Modeling for Multimodal Visual Action Recognition [50.38638300332429]
  We propose an ensemble modeling approach for multimodal action recognition. We independently train individual modality models using a variant of focal loss tailored to handle the long-tailed distribution of the MECCANO [21] dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T08:43:20Z)
• Consistent Explanations in the Face of Model Indeterminacy via Ensembling [12.661530681518899]
  This work addresses the challenge of providing consistent explanations for predictive models in the presence of model indeterminacy. We introduce ensemble methods to enhance the consistency of the explanations provided in these scenarios. Our findings highlight the importance of considering model indeterminacy when interpreting explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T18:45:43Z)
• Model-agnostic multi-objective approach for the evolutionary discovery of mathematical models [55.41644538483948]
  In modern data science, it is more interesting to understand the properties of the model, which parts could be replaced to obtain better results. We use multi-objective evolutionary optimization for composite data-driven model learning to obtain the algorithm's desired properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T11:17:09Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalization [107.0464488046289]
  This paper investigates the problem of learning robust, generalizable prediction models from a combination of datasets. Part of the challenge of learning robust models lies in the influence of unobserved confounders. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T08:18:06Z)
• Evaluating the Disentanglement of Deep Generative Models through Manifold Topology [66.06153115971732]
  We present a method for quantifying disentanglement that only uses the generative model. We empirically evaluate several state-of-the-art models across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T20:54:11Z)
• CONSAC: Robust Multi-Model Fitting by Conditional Sample Consensus [62.86856923633923]
  We present a robust estimator for fitting multiple parametric models of the same form to noisy measurements. In contrast to previous works, which resorted to hand-crafted search strategies for multiple model detection, we learn the search strategy from data. For self-supervised learning of the search, we evaluate the proposed algorithm on multi-homography estimation and demonstrate an accuracy that is superior to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T17:37:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.