Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09744v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:16:24 GMT
• Title: Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective
• Authors: Laixin Xie, Yang Ouyang, Longfei Chen, Ziming Wu, Quan Li
• Abstract summary: Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
• Score: 7.577040836988683
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. To address this, current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction and are primarily focused on handling missing data to enhance ML performance. These approaches rely on the observed data to estimate the missing values and therefore encounter three main shortcomings in imputation, including the need for different imputation methods for various missing data mechanisms, heavy dependence on the assumption of data distribution, and potential introduction of bias. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning (CL) framework to model observed data with missing values, where the ML model learns the similarity between an incomplete sample and its complete counterpart and the dissimilarity between other samples. Our proposed approach demonstrates the advantages of CL without requiring any imputation. To enhance interpretability, we introduce CIVis, a visual analytics system that incorporates interpretable techniques to visualize the learning process and diagnose the model status. Users can leverage their domain knowledge through interactive sampling to identify negative and positive pairs in CL. The output of CIVis is an optimized model that takes specified features and predicts downstream tasks. We provide two usage scenarios in regression and classification tasks and conduct quantitative experiments, expert interviews, and a qualitative user study to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. In short, this study offers a valuable contribution to addressing the challenges associated with ML modeling in the presence of missing data by providing a practical solution that achieves high predictive accuracy and model interpretability.

Related papers

• Dissecting Misalignment of Multimodal Large Language Models via Influence Function [12.832792175138241]
  We introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss. ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models. Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation in MLLM, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T15:45:41Z)
• On Discriminative Probabilistic Modeling for Self-Supervised Representation Learning [85.75164588939185]
  We study the discriminative probabilistic modeling problem on a continuous domain for (multimodal) self-supervised representation learning. We conduct generalization error analysis to reveal the limitation of current InfoNCE-based contrastive loss for self-supervised representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T18:02:46Z)
• Impact of Missing Values in Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis [0.0]
  This paper aims to examine the nuanced impact of missing values on machine learning (ML) models. Our analysis focuses on the challenges posed by missing values, including biased inferences, reduced predictive power, and increased computational burdens. The study employs case studies and real-world examples to illustrate the practical implications of addressing missing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T18:31:44Z)
• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches [64.40701218561921]
  We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z)
• AttributionScanner: A Visual Analytics System for Model Validation with Metadata-Free Slice Finding [29.07617945233152]
  Data slice finding is an emerging technique for validating machine learning (ML) models by identifying and analyzing subgroups in a dataset that exhibit poor performance. This approach faces significant challenges, including the laborious and costly requirement for additional metadata. We introduce AttributionScanner, an innovative human-in-the-loop Visual Analytics (VA) system, designed for metadata-free data slice finding. Our system identifies interpretable data slices that involve common model behaviors and visualizes these patterns through an Attribution Mosaic design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:17:32Z)
• Assessing Privacy Risks in Language Models: A Case Study on Summarization Tasks [65.21536453075275]
  We focus on the summarization task and investigate the membership inference (MI) attack. We exploit text similarity and the model's resistance to document modifications as potential MI signals. We discuss several safeguards for training summarization models to protect against MI attacks and discuss the inherent trade-off between privacy and utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T05:44:39Z)
• Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Models [3.9052860539161918]
  We propose a simple method for measuring a scale of models' reliance on any identified spurious feature. We assess the robustness towards a large set of known and newly found prediction biases for various pre-trained models and debiasing methods in Question Answering (QA) We find that while existing debiasing methods can mitigate reliance on a chosen spurious feature, the OOD performance gains of these methods can not be explained by mitigated reliance on biased features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T14:35:00Z)
• A prediction and behavioural analysis of machine learning methods for modelling travel mode choice [0.26249027950824505]
  We conduct a systematic comparison of different modelling approaches, across multiple modelling problems, in terms of the key factors likely to affect model choice. Results indicate that the models with the highest disaggregate predictive performance provide poorer estimates of behavioural indicators and aggregate mode shares. It is also observed that the MNL model performs robustly in a variety of situations, though ML techniques can improve the estimates of behavioural indices such as Willingness to Pay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T11:10:32Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.