Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12436v1
• Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 10:53:44 GMT
• Title: Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how students awareness of GenAI regulations relates to their perceived compliance and actual usage behavior.<n>Our research objective is to examine the association between regulatory knowledge, GenAI use, and perceived rule conformity among students in computer science related study programs.
• Score: 4.908297240926983
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into students learning practices. While previous research mainly examines adoption rates and attitudes, students awareness of institutional regulations and their perceived compliance remain unexplored. Understanding whether regulatory awareness influences student behavior is therefore important as higher education institutions create and apply AI policies. Objective: This study investigates how students awareness of GenAI regulations relates to their perceived compliance and actual usage behavior. Our research objective is to examine the association between regulatory knowledge, GenAI use, and perceived rule conformity among students in computer science related study programs. Method: A survey with 151 undergraduate students in Business Information Systems and E-Government programs at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover (Germany) collected data on GenAI usage, tools used, awareness of institutional regulations, and perceived compliance. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and correlation analyzes were applied. Results: Most students actively use GenAI tools, but over half are uncertain whether their usage complies with institutional regulations. Regulatory awareness shows only weak to moderate associations with actual usage behavior. Students primarily rely on privately accessed GenAI tools rather than institutionally provided solutions. Contributions: The study contributes empirical evidence on the relationship between regulatory awareness and GenAI usage in higher education. Our findings highlight a gap between institutional regulations and student practices and provide insights for educators and institutions on improving policy communication and integrating GenAI more effectively into teaching and learning contexts.

Related papers

• Is Solving Better Than Evaluating GenAI Solutions? [45.714140455691485]
  This study compares evaluating GenAI-generated solutions with traditional problem solving in a junior-level algorithms course.<n>We found no statistically significant differences between groups in midterm scores, final exam scores, overall course grades, or exam problems structurally aligned with the homework interventions.<n>Students received significantly higher homework scores when evaluating GenAI-generated solutions, but this localized advantage did not translate into downstream gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T02:08:29Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Course Generative AI Policies within Higher Education: Implications for Instruction in Computing Education [4.973919181995083]
  Higher education institutions (HEIs) have released a range of guidelines and policies to direct adoption within their institutions.<n>In computer science (CS) courses GenAI adoption is especially high and the implications for student learning are significant.<n>We compare institutional and computing course level guidance to better understand this terrain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T03:08:53Z)
• Learning by Chatting? Investigating the Impact of Generative AI on Information Seeking and Learning [33.12893683348563]
  Generative AI (GenAI) tools offer opportunities for augmenting human cognitive tasks.<n>Among these tasks, information seeking is rapidly reshaped by GenAI tools, with potentially profound implications for learning and knowledge acquisition.<n>We conducted a field experiment in which participants sought information through either ChatGPT or Google Search over a span of 8 days.<n>Our findings show that participants in the ChatGPT group experienced diminished agency in their information-seeking processes, as they offloaded much of the information selection to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T05:28:32Z)
• A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration [4.908297240926983]
  This study investigates how students utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in computer science-oriented disciplines.<n>It develops a structured, lightweight framework supporting institutional adaptation to pervasive GenAI usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T19:46:15Z)
• Exploring Student Perception on Gen AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Descriptive Study [1.978884131103313]
  This study examines how students perceive, use, and evaluate Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)<n>Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 436 postgraduate Computer Science students at the University of Hertfordshire.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-29T17:19:39Z)
• Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context [32.495879271249414]
  This study presents the first comprehensive empirical mapping of GenAI adoption, usage patterns, and literacy in Italy.<n>Our findings reveal widespread adoption for both work and personal use, including sensitive tasks like emotional support and medical advice.<n>We identify a significant gender divide where women are half as likely to adopt GenAI and use it less frequently than men.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T11:01:28Z)
• Understanding Student Attitudes and Acceptability of GenAI Tools in Higher Ed: Scale Development and Evaluation [22.35484281040714]
  This study introduces a validated survey instrument designed to assess students' perceptions of generative AI (GenAI)<n>The instrument includes six thematic domains: institutional understanding, fairness and trust, academic and career influence, societal concerns, and GenAI use in writing and coursework.<n>Students from multilingual households perceived greater clarity in institutional policy, while first-generation students reported a stronger belief in GenAI's impact on future careers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T21:22:34Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Generative Artificial Intelligence for Academic Research: Evidence from Guidance Issued for Researchers by Higher Education Institutions in the United States [4.06279597585806]
  generative AI (GenAI) has signaled a significant shift in research activities.<n>This has raised questions about how to balance the seemingly productive uses of GenAI with ethical concerns.<n>To address these concerns, many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have released institutional guidance for researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T23:34:02Z)
• Early Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education: Emergent Student Use Cases and Perspectives in 2023 [38.83649319653387]
  There is limited prior research on computing students' use and perceptions of GenAI. We surveyed all computer science majors in a small engineering-focused R1 university. We discuss the impact of our findings on the emerging conversation around GenAI and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T20:17:47Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science [35.90108933392196]
  This study reports a comprehensive scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions. This research explores the current status of GenAI integration, focusing on stakeholder roles, governance structures, and ethical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T01:53:13Z)
• Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines [11.470910427306569]
  This study analyzes academic policies and guidelines established by top-ranked U.S. universities regarding the use of GenAI. Results show that the majority of these universities adopt an open but cautious approach towards GenAI. Findings provide four practical implications for educators in teaching practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:33:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.