Is Spurious Correlation Removal Always Learnable?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12930v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:49:43 GMT
- Title: Is Spurious Correlation Removal Always Learnable?
- Abstract summary: Invariant learning can fail even when the structure is statistically identifiable.<n>We show a conditional computational barrier: under a black-box samplable supervised sparse recovery primitive, there exist emphamplable multi-dimensional environments.<n>Synthetic and real datasets illustrate the predicted gaps and transitions and motivate simple diversity diagnostics.
- Score: 56.28155520961125
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Invariant learning can fail even when the invariant structure is statistically identifiable. We show a conditional computational barrier: under a black-box samplable supervised sparse recovery primitive motivated by average-case sparse-recovery reductions, there exist \emph{samplable} multi-environment instances with a one-dimensional predictive invariant subspace ($k=1$) that are learnable with polynomial samples by exhaustive search, while any polynomial-time constant-accuracy recovery algorithm would contradict the primitive. We further quantify environment diversity by a separation parameter $γ$, which controls identifiability and the curvature of invariance objectives. Under sufficient diversity and local Gaussian regularity, the minimax risk is $\mathbb{E}[\dist(\hat{V},V_{\mathrm{inv}})^2]=Θ(k(d-k)/(n|\mathcal{E}|))$, and under label-induced shifts a phase transition occurs at $n^*\propto k(d-k)/(|\mathcal{E}|γ^2)$ with refined estimation error scaling proportional to $1/γ^2$. Synthetic and real datasets illustrate the predicted gaps and transitions and motivate simple diversity diagnostics.
Related papers
- Statistical inverse learning and $\ell^1$-regularization [0.27998963147546135]
We study the recovery of sparse functions from finite, noisy, and indirect observations in the framework of statistical inverse learning.<n>We establish almost-sure exponents and derive non-asymptotic high-probability convergence rates in both prediction and $ell1$ reconstruction norms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-08T14:32:08Z) - Anisotropic local law for non-separable sample covariance matrices [10.181748307494608]
We establish local laws for sample covariance matrices $K = N-1sum_i=1N g_ig_ig_i*$ where the random vectors $g_1, ldots, g_N in Rn$ are independent with common covariance $$.<n>We discuss several classes of non-separable examples satisfying our assumptions, including conditionally mean-zero distributions, the random features model $g = (Xw)$ arising in machine learning, and Gaussian measures with
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T03:28:51Z) - Discrete Double-Bracket Flows for Isotropic-Noise Invariant Eigendecomposition [7.186083931122418]
We study matrix-free eigendecomposition under a matrix-vector product (MVP) oracle.<n>Standard approximation methods either use fixed steps that couple stability to $|C_k|$, or adapt steps that slow down due to vanishing updates.<n>We establish global convergence via strict-saddle for the diagonalization objective and an input-to-state stability analysis, with complexity scaling as $O(|C_e|2 / (2))$ under trace-free perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-14T13:09:29Z) - Phase-space entropy at acquisition reflects downstream learnability [54.4100065023873]
We propose an acquisition-level scalar $S_mathcal B$ based on instrument-resolved phase space.<n>We show theoretically that (S_mathcal B) correctly identifies the phase-space coherence of periodic sampling.<n>$|S_mathcal B|$ consistently ranks sampling geometries and predicts downstream reconstruction/recognition difficulty emphwithout training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T10:03:51Z) - Complexity Analysis of Normalizing Constant Estimation: from Jarzynski Equality to Annealed Importance Sampling and beyond [40.79840141270367]
Given an unnormalized probability density $piproptomathrme-V$, estimating its normalizing constant $Z=int_mathbbRdmathrme-V(x)mathrmdx$ or free energy $F=-log Z$ is a crucial problem in Bayesian statistics, statistical mechanics, and machine learning.<n>We propose a new algorithm based on reverse diffusion samplers, establish a framework for analyzing its complexity, and empirically demonstrate its efficiency in tackling multimodality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T00:05:28Z) - Variance Reduction for the Independent Metropolis Sampler [11.074080383657453]
We prove that if $pi$ is close enough under KL divergence to another density $q$, an independent sampler that obtains samples from $pi$ achieves smaller variance than i.i.d. sampling from $pi$.
We propose an adaptive independent Metropolis algorithm that adapts the proposal density such that its KL divergence with the target is being reduced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T16:38:53Z) - Accurate and Scalable Stochastic Gaussian Process Regression via Learnable Coreset-based Variational Inference [8.077736581030264]
We introduce a novel inductive variational inference method for Gaussian process ($mathcalGP$) regression, by deriving a posterior over a learnable set of coresets.<n>Unlike former free-form variational families for inference, our coreset-based variational $mathcalGP$ (CVGP) is defined in terms of the $mathcalGP$ prior and the (weighted) data likelihood.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T17:22:22Z) - TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood.
Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation.
We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean?
Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z) - Statistical Learning under Heterogeneous Distribution Shift [71.8393170225794]
Ground-truth predictor is additive $mathbbE[mathbfz mid mathbfx,mathbfy] = f_star(mathbfx) +g_star(mathbfy)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-27T16:34:21Z) - Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Time [97.11565882347772]
We study the problem of high-dimensional robust linear regression where a learner is given access to $n$ samples from the generative model $Y = langle X,w* rangle + epsilon$
We propose estimators for this problem under two settings: (i) $X$ is L4-L2 hypercontractive, $mathbbE [XXtop]$ has bounded condition number and $epsilon$ has bounded variance and (ii) $X$ is sub-Gaussian with identity second moment and $epsilon$ is
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T06:44:44Z) - Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and
Variance Reduction [63.41789556777387]
Asynchronous Q-learning aims to learn the optimal action-value function (or Q-function) of a Markov decision process (MDP)
We show that the number of samples needed to yield an entrywise $varepsilon$-accurate estimate of the Q-function is at most on the order of $frac1mu_min (1-gamma)5varepsilon2+ fract_mixmu_min (1-gamma)$ up to some logarithmic factor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-04T17:51:00Z) - Agnostic Learning of a Single Neuron with Gradient Descent [92.7662890047311]
We consider the problem of learning the best-fitting single neuron as measured by the expected square loss.
For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$.
For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T07:20:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.