When and How Severely: Scenario-Specific Safety Envelopes for Driving VLAs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14238v2
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:17:08 GMT
- Title: When and How Severely: Scenario-Specific Safety Envelopes for Driving VLAs
- Abstract summary: Safety certification of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving planners under ISO 21448 rests on an Operational Design Domain (ODD) specification.<n>We evaluate Alpamayo R1, a 10B- parameter open-weight driving VLA, on 15,968 (clip, attack) pairs.<n>We find a conservative-aggregate gap: an aggregate safe threshold of $leq 50$ under a 15% average displacement error (ADE) budget masks well-sampled scenarios that tolerate the top of the tested grid.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Safety certification of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving planners under ISO 21448 (SOTIF) rests on an Operational Design Domain (ODD) specification that answers two complementary questions: when does the planner start to fail, and how severely does it fail once it does? We evaluate Alpamayo R1, a 10B-parameter open-weight driving VLA, on 15,968 (clip, attack) pairs. We find a conservative-aggregate gap: an aggregate safe threshold of $σ\leq 50$ under a 15% average displacement error (ADE) budget masks well-sampled scenarios that tolerate the top of the tested grid ($σ= 70$). A Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) on the changed-explanation subset identifies six discrete severity bands (BIC-optimal $k{=}6$), so two perturbation conditions with the same mean error can differ materially in their share of high-severity (C4/C5) failures. Joining the two analyses on the same corpus surfaces a finding neither yields in isolation: the scenarios with the loosest noise thresholds are not those with the lowest high-severity rate: STOP_SIGNAL concentrates roughly $4\times$ the C4/C5 share of LANE_KEEPING despite tolerating a larger $σ$. A deployable SOTIF ODD specification for driving VLAs therefore requires a two-dimensional safety envelope, not a single aggregate value per hazard.
Related papers
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models [73.04773649437375]
Multimodal safety moderation requires distinguishing risks arising from visual content, user intent, and assistant behavior.<n>We introduce SafeAtlas-VL, a dataset of 1.5M training instances that places image-, request-, and response-level judgments on a five-level ordered scale.<n>We also construct SafeAtlas-Bench, a set of 5,000 instances for evaluating five-level predictions and continuous risk scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-29T07:08:01Z) - Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z) - BOKBO (Best of K Bad Options): Calibrated Abstention for VLA Policies [1.3918848543076061]
Test-time scaling for vision-suite-action (VLA) policies, methods such as RoboMonkey, SEAL, MG-Select, and V-GPS, samples K candidate action chunks at inference and executes the verifier-best.<n>We propose BOKBO, the first conformal abstention layer for K-sample VLA inference, providing finite-sample distribution-free guarantees on executed-violation rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T23:39:09Z) - Capability and Robustness Cannot Both Be Free: An Information-Theoretic Bound for Vision-Language-Action Models [0.0]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models reach high success rates on clean inputs but collapse under small adversarial perturbations.<n>We prove that a $16/255$ PGD attack drops OpenVLA-7B's LIBERO success from $95%$ to under $5%$.<n>For any VLA policy, capability $I(Astar;Api)$ and robustness $I(Api;Atildepi)-I(Api;)$ sum to at most $H(Astar)+I(X;Xt
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-25T14:16:57Z) - Fast-dDrive: Efficient Block-Diffusion VLM for Autonomous Driving [54.31800246594724]
We present Fast-dDrive, a block-diffusion VLA that performs bidirectional refinement within semantic units.<n>We show that Fast-dDrive redefines the speed-accuracy frontier for driving agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-22T02:31:32Z) - Lost in Fog: Sensor Perturbations Expose Reasoning Fragility in Driving VLAs [0.0]
We present a perturbation study of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) robustness in autonomous driving.<n>We find that reasoning consistency is a high-fidelity indicator of trajectory reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T17:34:02Z) - Escaping the Diversity Trap in Robotic Manipulation via Anchor-Centric Adaptation [50.23374353859762]
"Maximizing coverage" by collecting diverse, single-shot demonstrations can be self-defeating due to non-vanishing estimation noise.<n>We formalize this phenomenon as a Coverage--Density Trade-off.<n>We propose Anchor-Centric Adaptation (ACA), a two-stage framework that first stabilizes a policy skeleton through repeated demonstrations at core anchors, then expands coverage to high-risk boundaries via teacher-forced error mining and constrained residual updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T07:35:24Z) - One Perturbation, Two Failure Modes: Probing VLM Safety via Embedding-Guided Typographic Perturbations [0.8116687935773981]
Typographic prompt injection exploits vision language models' (VLMs) ability to read text rendered in images.<n>We show how to maximize image text embedding similarity under bounded $ell_infty$ perturbations.<n>Experiments on GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Mistral-Large-3, and Qwen3-VL confirm that optimization recovers readability and reduces safety aligned refusals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T01:21:47Z) - LLM Readiness Harness: Evaluation, Observability, and CI Gates for LLM/RAG Applications [51.56484100374058]
We present a readiness harness for LLM and RAG applications that turns evaluation into a deployment decision workflow.<n>The system combines automated benchmarks, OpenTelemetry observability, and CI quality gates under a minimal API contract.<n>We evaluate the harness on ticket-routing and BEIR tasks with full Azure matrix coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-28T18:03:32Z) - Edge Reliability Gap in Vision-Language Models: Quantifying Failure Modes of Compressed VLMs Under Visual Corruption [0.0]
The rapid compression of large vision-language models for edge deployment raises an underexplored question: do compact models fail differently, not merely more often?<n>This study compares a 7-billion- parameter quantised VLM (Qwen2.5-VL-7B, 4-bit NF4) against a 500-million- parameter FP16 model (SmolVLM2-500M) across 4,000 samples from VQAv2 and COCO Captions.<n>A three-category error taxonomy (Object Blindness, Semantic Drift, Prior Bias) is applied as a diagnostic framework. Confidence calibration is measured via Expected Error (ECE) using mean token probability
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T10:14:40Z) - SaFeR-VLM: Toward Safety-aware Fine-grained Reasoning in Multimodal Models [66.71948519280669]
Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs) demonstrate impressive crossmodal reasoning but often amplify safety risks under adversarial prompts.<n> Existing defenses mainly act at the output level and do not constrain the reasoning process, leaving models to implicit risks.<n>We propose SaFeR-VLM, which integrates four components and supports dynamic and interpretable safety decisions beyond surface-level filtering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T10:39:12Z) - Contextual Combinatorial Bandits with Probabilistically Triggered Arms [55.9237004478033]
We study contextual bandits with probabilistically triggered arms (C$2$MAB-T) under a variety of smoothness conditions.
Under the triggering modulated (TPM) condition, we devise the C$2$-UC-T algorithm and derive a regret bound $tildeO(dsqrtT)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-30T02:51:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.