Shadows of Transparency: Signaling Transparency-Impeding Behavior Using Public Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14377v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:09:57 GMT
• Title: Shadows of Transparency: Signaling Transparency-Impeding Behavior Using Public Data
• Abstract summary: Freedom of Information (FOI) laws aim to increase government transparency.<n>Existing assessments focus mainly on legal compliance and procedural outcomes, leaving organizational behavior underexamined.<n>This paper develops and evaluates a pattern-based approach that uses public response data to signal transparency-impeding behavior.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Freedom of Information (FOI) laws aim to increase government transparency, yet existing assessments focus mainly on legal compliance and procedural outcomes, leaving organizational behavior underexamined. As FOI processes are increasingly mediated through digital information systems, public response data offer traces of how organizations handle requests and disclosures in practice. This paper develops and evaluates a pattern-based approach that uses such data to signal transparency-impeding behavior across government agencies and over time. Drawing on prior literature, we identify nine recurring behavioral patterns that undermine transparency. Using a dataset of 15,277 Dutch FOI dossiers comprising 139,449 documents, we operationalize and evaluate measurable indicators for six of these patterns, demonstrating that they enable systematic comparison of disclosure practices across agencies and over time. Expert interviews with researchers, journalists, and civil servants confirm the interpretability and practical usefulness of the indicators for investigative prioritization, comparative research, and transparency oversight.

Related papers

• The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallacies [16.486301766411223]
  Data transparency has emerged as a rallying cry for addressing concerns about AI.<n>While these calls are crucial for accountability, current transparency policies often fall short of their intended aims.<n>Similar to nutrition facts for food, policies aimed at nutrition facts for AI currently suffer from a limited consideration of research on effective disclosures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T04:14:53Z)
• TAPAS: A Pattern-Based Approach to Assessing Government Transparency [0.0]
  We present the Transparency Anti-Pattern Assessment System (TAPAS)<n>TAPAS is a data-driven methodology designed to evaluate government transparency through the identification of behavioral patterns that impede transparency.<n>We show that TAPAS enables continuous monitoring and provides actionable insights without requiring significant resource investments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:01:42Z)
• AI data transparency: an exploration through the lens of AI incidents [2.255682336735152]
  This research explores the status of public documentation about data practices within AI systems generating public concern. We highlight a need to develop systematic ways of monitoring AI data transparency that account for the diversity of AI system types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T07:23:30Z)
• Foundation Model Transparency Reports [61.313836337206894]
  We propose Foundation Model Transparency Reports, drawing upon the transparency reporting practices in social media. We identify 6 design principles given the successes and shortcomings of social media transparency reporting. Well-designed transparency reports could reduce compliance costs, in part due to overlapping regulatory requirements across different jurisdictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T03:09:06Z)
• The Foundation Model Transparency Index [55.862805799199194]
  The Foundation Model Transparency Index specifies 100 indicators that codify transparency for foundation models. We score developers in relation to their practices for their flagship foundation model. Overall, the Index establishes the level of transparency today to drive progress on foundation model governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:39:02Z)
• Towards Cross-Provider Analysis of Transparency Information for Data Protection [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel approach to enable large-scale transparency information analysis across service providers. We provide the general approach for advanced transparency information analysis, an open source architecture and implementation in the form of a queryable analysis platform. Future work can build upon our contributions to gain more insights into so-far hidden data-sharing practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T10:36:09Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Classification in the Domain of Public Affairs [65.9077733300329]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to greatly enhance the analysis of public affairs documents. LLMs can be of great use to process domain-specific documents, such as those in the domain of public affairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:35:01Z)
• Users are the North Star for AI Transparency [111.5679109784322]
  Despite widespread calls for transparent artificial intelligence systems, the term is too overburdened with disparate meanings to express precise policy aims or to orient concrete lines of research. Part of why this happens is that a clear ideal of AI transparency goes unsaid in this body of work. We explicitly name such a north star -- transparency that is user-centered, user-appropriate, and honest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T18:53:29Z)
• Achieving Transparency Report Privacy in Linear Time [1.9981375888949475]
  We first investigate and demonstrate potential privacy hazards brought on by the deployment of transparency and fairness measures in released ATRs. We then propose a linear-time optimal-privacy scheme, built upon standard linear fractional programming (LFP) theory, for announcing ATRs. We quantify the privacy-utility trade-offs induced by our scheme, and analyze the impact of privacy perturbation on fairness measures in ATRs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T22:05:10Z)
• Trustworthy Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
  We propose a transparency framework for software design, incorporating research on user trust and experience. Our framework enables developing software that incorporates transparency in its design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T12:34:01Z)
• Dimensions of Transparency in NLP Applications [64.16277166331298]
  Broader transparency in descriptions of and communication regarding AI systems is widely considered desirable. Previous work has suggested that a trade-off exists between greater system transparency and user confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T11:46:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.