Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15466v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 20:53:16 GMT
• Title: Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance
• Abstract summary: This article argues that these arrangements form a coherent institutional family, which we call commons-governed artificial intelligence.<n>We contribute a two-dimensional taxonomy whose first axis is the resource layer of the AI stack held in common.<n>We close with the tensions that constrain the project, openwashing, the compute bottleneck, free-riding, and the tension between scale and sustainability.
• Score: 1.5736899098702974
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The governance of artificial intelligence is overwhelmingly theorized through two institutional frames. In the market frame, the data, models, and compute that constitute the AI stack are private goods exchanged under property and contract; in the state frame, a regulator imposes rules from above. A third possibility, the collective and self-organized stewardship of AI-relevant resources by the communities that produce and depend on them, remains comparatively under-theorized, even as it proliferates in practice through data trusts and cooperatives, federated learning consortia, public compute initiatives, open-weight model collaborations, and community data sovereignty regimes. This article argues that these arrangements form a coherent institutional family, which we call commons-governed artificial intelligence, and that the analytic vocabulary developed by Elinor Ostrom and her successors for common-pool and knowledge commons is the right backbone for classifying them. We contribute a two-dimensional taxonomy whose first axis is the resource layer of the AI stack held in common, distinguishing data, compute, models, knowledge and evaluation, and energy, and whose second axis is the governance function performed, derived from Ostrom design principles. We populate the taxonomy by examining the published evidence layer by layer, locate ten recurrent institutional archetypes within it, synthesize their positions through a maturity matrix and a comparative reading against the eight design principles, and treat the energy and sustainability of computation as a first-class commons-governance problem rather than an externality. We close with the tensions that constrain the project, openwashing, the compute bottleneck, free-riding, and the tension between scale and sustainability, and with a research agenda for a polycentric AI commons.

Related papers

• A game theory for foundation models shows new paths to rational cooperation through similarity inference [56.53805518668248]
  We show that foundation model agents engaging in optimal planning consistently converge to stable cooperation.<n>By shifting from decoupled to embedded agency, these agents model themselves as part of the universe they inhabit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:24:33Z)
• The Dignity-Centric Stack: A Commons-Governed, Horizontally Federated Architecture for Human-Dignity AI [1.5736899098702974]
  We argue that a human-dignity-centric digital social contract grounds personal data in human dignity, data personalism, and data sovereignty.<n>We construct a six-layer architecture mapping each dimension onto a layer of commons-governed AI infrastructure.<n>We conclude that commons-governed AI realizes the values the contract proclaims more faithfully than the regulation it presupposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T12:21:07Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• When Agents Evolve, Institutions Follow [52.359340707289114]
  We argue that multi-agent systems built on large language models face the same challenge.<n>Their central problem is not only individual intelligence, but collective organization.<n>We translate seven historical political institutions, spanning four canonical governance patterns, into executable multi-agent architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T10:30:58Z)
• Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science [70.3658845234978]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly extended the capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)<n>Despite this rapid progress, the field still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error.<n>This bottleneck stems from the ambiguity of attribution.<n>We propose a factor attribution paradigm to systematically identify collaboration-driving factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T04:19:52Z)
• Pluralism in AI Governance: Toward Sociotechnical Alignment and Normative Coherence [0.16921396880325779]
  The study synthesises frameworks including Full-Stack Alignment, Thick Models of Value, Value Sensitive Design, and Public Constitutional AI.<n>It introduces a layered framework linking values, mechanisms, and strategies, and maps tensions such as fairness versus efficiency, transparency versus security, and privacy versus equity.<n>The study contributes a holistic, value-sensitive model of AI governance, reframing regulation as a proactive mechanism for embedding public values into sociotechnical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T14:28:56Z)
• Revising Bloom's Taxonomy for Dual-Mode Cognition in Human-AI Systems: The Augmented Cognition Framework [0.0]
  cognitive acts increasingly occur in two distinct modes: individually, using biological resources alone, or distributed across a human-AI system.<n>Existing revisions to Bloom's taxonomy treat AI as an external capability to be mapped against human cognition rather than as a driver of this dual-mode structure.<n>This paper proposes the Augmented Cognition Framework (ACF), a restructured taxonomy built on three principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T12:45:43Z)
• Will Power Return to the Clouds? From Divine Authority to GenAI Authority [0.2864713389096699]
  Generative AI systems now mediate newsfeeds, search rankings, and creative content for hundreds of millions of users.<n>This article juxtaposes the Galileo Affair, a touchstone of clerical knowledge control, with contemporary Big-Tech content moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T18:59:44Z)
• Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence [2.153445979060976]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a foundational general-purpose technology, raising new dilemmas of sovereignty in an interconnected world.<n>This paper develops a conceptual and formal framework for understanding sovereign AI as a continuum rather than a binary condition.<n>We present a planner's model that identifies two policy pillars: equalizing marginal returns across the four sovereignty pillars and setting openness where global benefits equal exposure risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:02:10Z)
• The next question after Turing's question: Introducing the Grow-AI test [51.56484100374058]
  This study aims to extend the framework for assessing artificial intelligence, called GROW-AI.<n>GROW-AI is designed to answer the question "Can machines grow up?" -- a natural successor to the Turing Test.<n>The originality of the work lies in the conceptual transposition of the process of "growing" from the human world to that of artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:19:42Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Self-organizing Democratized Learning: Towards Large-scale Distributed Learning Systems [71.14339738190202]
  democratized learning (Dem-AI) lays out a holistic philosophy with underlying principles for building large-scale distributed and democratized machine learning systems. Inspired by Dem-AI philosophy, a novel distributed learning approach is proposed in this paper. The proposed algorithms demonstrate better results in the generalization performance of learning models in agents compared to the conventional FL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T08:34:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.