Improving Capstone Team Outcomes through Dynamic Skill Matching and Preference Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15572v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:29:35 GMT
• Title: Improving Capstone Team Outcomes through Dynamic Skill Matching and Preference Alignment
• Abstract summary: Team-based projects are a cornerstone of engineering and computing courses, but unstructured team formation often leads to poor project outcomes.<n>This paper introduces a novel, three-stage methodology for creating effective student teams by integrating student preferences with project skill requirements.
• Score: 1.1807695418165365
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Team-based projects are a cornerstone of engineering and computing courses, but unstructured team formation often leads to poor project outcomes due to misaligned student interests and inadequate skill coverage. This paper introduces a novel, three-stage methodology for creating effective student teams by integrating student preferences with project skill requirements. In the first stage, students complete a survey to report their project interests and self-assessed skills. Next, a Large Language Model (LLM) analyzes project descriptions to extract the necessary skills for each project's success. Finally, a dynamic assignment algorithm matches students to projects, simultaneously maximizing skill coverage and preference alignment. The algorithm iteratively prioritizes projects with unfulfilled skill needs to optimize team balance. Preliminary evaluations show our approach produces teams with higher skill coverage and better preference satisfaction compared to random or manual assignment approaches. Our approach also overcomes limitations of widely-used tools like CATME Team-Maker, which do not explicitly account for project skill fulfillment. Our findings point toward an effective and customizable strategy for improving student motivation and learning outcomes in project-based courses.

Related papers

• Skill-R1: Agent Skill Evolution via Reinforcement Learning [84.35984979949502]
  Skill-R1 is a reinforcement learning framework for instance-level recurrent skill optimization from verifiable rewards.<n>It preserves black-box compatibility with both open- and closed-source models while making adaptation substantially cheaper than model-level updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:19:15Z)
• TeamUp: Semantic Project Matching and Team Formation for Learning at Scale [5.239407424503223]
  Project-based learning improves student engagement and learning outcomes.<n>Traditional allocation methods can't construct the cognitively diverse teams that collaborate cognitively.<n>We propose TeamUp, a lightweight, embedding-based team-forming system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T00:07:59Z)
• Causally Aligned Curriculum Learning [69.11672390876763]
  This paper studies the problem of curriculum RL through causal lenses.<n>We derive a sufficient graphical condition characterizing causally aligned source tasks.<n>We develop an efficient algorithm to generate a causally aligned curriculum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T02:20:38Z)
• Software development projects as a way for multidisciplinary soft and future skills education [0.5654295647905844]
  The paper presents a possible approach to teaching in soft and future skills in a short, intensive joint project.<n>In the project we use problem based learning, active learning and group-work teaching methodologies.<n>The results prove that the presented method increased participants soft skills in communication, cooperation, digital skills and self reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:52:40Z)
• AI Mentors for Student Projects: Spotting Early Issues in Computer Science Proposals [35.92015790655676]
  We develop a software system that collects project proposals and information to support educators in determining whether a student is ready to engage with aptitude.<n>We find that users perceived the system as helpful for writing project proposals and identifying tools and technologies to learn more about.<n>While the prospect of using LLMs to rate the quality of students' project proposals is promising, its long-term effectiveness hinges on future efforts at characterizing indicators that reliably predict students' success and motivation to learn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T16:24:14Z)
• Code Collaborate: Dissecting Team Dynamics in First-Semester Programming Students [3.0294711465150006]
  The study highlights the collaboration trends that emerge as first-semester students develop a 2D game project. Results indicate that students often slightly overestimate their contributions, with more engaged individuals more likely to acknowledge mistakes. Team performance shows no significant variation based on nationality or gender composition, though teams that disbanded frequently consisted of lone wolves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T11:42:05Z)
• A Problem-Based Learning Approach to Teaching Design in CS1 [0.9786690381850356]
  Design skills are increasingly recognized as a core competency for software professionals. New designers require a structured process to keep them from being overwhelmed by possibilities. We present our experience teaching a team design project course to 200 first-year-university students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T23:36:08Z)
• Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Hands [68.77645200579181]
  We propose a theoretical framework for aligning economic interests of different stakeholders in the online learning problems through contract design. For the planning problem, we design an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to determine the optimal contracts against the far-sighted agent. For the learning problem, we introduce a generic design of no-regret learning algorithms to untangle the challenges from robust design of contracts to the balance of exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:53:00Z)
• A Reinforcement Learning-assisted Genetic Programming Algorithm for Team Formation Problem Considering Person-Job Matching [70.28786574064694]
  A reinforcement learning-assisted genetic programming algorithm (RL-GP) is proposed to enhance the quality of solutions. The hyper-heuristic rules obtained through efficient learning can be utilized as decision-making aids when forming project teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-08T14:32:12Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Success Induced Task Prioritization [68.8204255655161]
  We introduce Success Induced Task Prioritization (SITP), a framework for automatic curriculum learning. The algorithm selects the order of tasks that provide the fastest learning for agents. We demonstrate that SITP matches or surpasses the results of other curriculum design methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T12:32:43Z)
• Latent Skill Planning for Exploration and Transfer [49.25525932162891]
  In this paper, we investigate how these two approaches can be integrated into a single reinforcement learning agent. We leverage the idea of partial amortization for fast adaptation at test time. We demonstrate the benefits of our design decisions across a suite of challenging locomotion tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T18:40:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.