Misinformation Propagation in Benign Multi-Agent Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16710v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:40:01 GMT
• Title: Misinformation Propagation in Benign Multi-Agent Systems
• Abstract summary: Multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as medical diagnosis, legal analysis, and forensic decision-making.<n>Their reliability can be at risk when single agents reason from incorrect or misleading context.<n>This work studies this risk by injecting intent-based misinformation into benign single-agent and multi-agent systems.
• Score: 11.967259729189388
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent systems, in which multiple large language model agents solve problems through turn-based interaction, are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as medical diagnosis, legal analysis, and forensic decision-making. Their reliability can be at risk when single agents reason from incorrect or misleading context, e.g., from tool calls, since errors may propagate through agent interactions. This work studies this risk by injecting intent-based misinformation into benign single-agent and multi-agent systems across reasoning, knowledge, and alignment tasks. We find that misinformation can degrade single-agent performance and persists across multi-agent debate, with agents often retaining answers introduced by misinformed peers. Nevertheless, multi-agent debate reduces the resulting performance degradation compared to single-agent prompting, especially when most agents are not exposed to misinformation. Robustness depends on group composition and decision protocol. Consensus can be more stable than voting under peer pressure, while majorities can often steer misinformed agents back toward correct answers. Our results show that misinformation robustness in multi-agent systems depends on the underlying model and also on how agents exchange information and aggregate decisions.

Related papers

• Preventing Error Propagation in Multi-Agent AI through Runtime Monitoring [4.75542422590052]
  We study reliable multi-agent AI communication through reasoning exchange and runtime answer revision.<n>We develop a framework in which agents first answer multiple-choice questions independently, then share reasoning traces and revise their decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-27T17:44:24Z)
• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agent [57.10083973844841]
  AgentArk is a novel framework to distill multi-agent dynamics into the weights of a single model.<n>We investigate three hierarchical distillation strategies across various models, tasks, scaling, and scenarios.<n>By shifting the burden of computation from inference to training, the distilled models preserve the efficiency of one agent while exhibiting strong reasoning and self-correction performance of multiple agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T19:18:28Z)
• AgentDoG: A Diagnostic Guardrail Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security [126.49733412191416]
  Current guardrail models lack agentic risk awareness and transparency in risk diagnosis.<n>We propose a unified three-dimensional taxonomy that categorizes agentic risks by their source (where), failure mode (how), and consequence (what)<n>We introduce a new fine-grained agentic safety benchmark (ATBench) and a Diagnostic Guardrail framework for agent safety and security (AgentDoG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T13:45:41Z)
• Can an Individual Manipulate the Collective Decisions of Multi-Agents? [53.01767232004823]
  M-Spoiler is a framework that simulates agent interactions within a multi-agent system to generate adversarial samples.<n>M-Spoiler introduces a stubborn agent that actively aids in optimizing adversarial samples.<n>Our findings confirm the risks posed by the knowledge of an individual agent in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T01:54:20Z)
• Kaleidoscopic Teaming in Multi Agent Simulations [75.47388708240042]
  We argue that existing red teaming or safety evaluation frameworks fall short in evaluating safety risks in complex behaviors, thought processes and actions taken by agents.<n>We introduce new in-context optimization techniques that can be used in our kaleidoscopic teaming framework to generate better scenarios for safety analysis.<n>We present appropriate metrics that can be used along with our framework to measure safety of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T23:37:17Z)
• PeerGuard: Defending Multi-Agent Systems Against Backdoor Attacks Through Mutual Reasoning [8.191214701984162]
  Multi-agent systems leverage advanced AI models as autonomous agents that interact, cooperate, or compete to complete complex tasks.<n>Despite their growing importance, safety in multi-agent systems remains largely underexplored.<n>This work investigates backdoor vulnerabilities in multi-agent systems and proposes a defense mechanism based on agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T19:08:29Z)
• When Disagreements Elicit Robustness: Investigating Self-Repair Capabilities under LLM Multi-Agent Disagreements [56.29265568399648]
  We argue that disagreements prevent premature consensus and expand the explored solution space.<n>Disagreements on task-critical steps can derail collaboration depending on the topology of solution paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:24:43Z)
• Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration [21.955058255432974]
  We propose to monitor agents during action prediction and intervene when a future error is likely to occur.<n>Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T18:35:08Z)
• On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents [58.79302663733703]
  Large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown great abilities across various tasks due to the collaboration of expert agents.<n>The impact of clumsy or even malicious agents--those who frequently make errors in their tasks--on the overall performance of the system remains underexplored.<n>This paper investigates what is the resilience of various system structures under faulty agents on different downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T03:25:20Z)
• Subjective Knowledge and Reasoning about Agents in Multi-Agent Systems [5.983405936883194]
  In multi-agent systems, agents can influence other agents' mental states by (mis)informing them about the presence/absence of collaborators or adversaries. In this paper, we investigate how Kripke structure-based epistemic models can be extended to express the above notion based on an agent's subjective knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-22T13:50:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.