Understanding Scam Trends and Rail Paths from Reddit Self-Disclosure Narratives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16874v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:50:07 GMT
• Title: Understanding Scam Trends and Rail Paths from Reddit Self-Disclosure Narratives
• Abstract summary: Existing works analyze characteristics of scam types and rails, but they do not track scam trends across years.<n>We build a dataset to analyze the yearly trend of scam characteristics and rail paths using Reddit self-disclosure narratives from 2023 to 2025.
• Score: 12.665919846874568
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online scam behavior is inherently multi-stage, and the lifecycle includes temporally ordered rails and events rather than isolated signals. Existing works analyze characteristics of scam types and rails, but they do not track scam trends across years. Moreover, the work on the relations between rails is hampered due to the lack of open-source datasets with annotations and coverage of different scam types. To address these gaps, we build a dataset to analyze the yearly trend of scam characteristics and rail paths using Reddit self-disclosure narratives from 2023 to 2025. We collect 21,304 posts from scam-related subreddits with at least one rail among identity, communication, platform, and payment for trend analysis by heuristic annotation. Then, we label 1,800 posts containing explicit or recoverable scam chains by an LLM-assisted method for scam path analysis. The method is evaluated with human annotation. Lastly, we run a topic model on the comments of the posts to analyze the community support behavior. The results reveal that scam processes are predominantly multi-rail. Across years, different scam types and rail components dominate. Different scam types vary systematically in path complexity. Reddit support behaviors have become more detailed over time. This work supports synthetic scam chain data simulation and AI-related scam risk assessment, though findings may not generalise to other platforms.

Related papers

• DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbots [49.59847654758852]
  Mental health professionals have raised concerns about risks of psychological harm from interaction with large language models (LLMs)<n>We developed DelusionEval, an evaluation protocol that tests a model's tendencies to exhibit behaviors linked to promoting user delusions.<n>We find that the tendency of an evaluated LLM to exhibit delusion-linked behavior does not reliably correlate with model size, release date, or the presence of test-time reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T16:11:08Z)
• LongTraceRL: Learning Long-Context Reasoning from Search Agent Trajectories with Rubric Rewards [53.339700196282905]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown promise for this task.<n>Existing methods are limited by low-confusability distractors and sparse, outcome-only reward signals.<n>textscLongTraceRL produces training contexts that are far more challenging than those built by random sampling or one-shot search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T17:51:40Z)
• PreScam: A Benchmark for Predicting Scam Progression from Early Conversations [22.864427809364397]
  We introduce PreScam, a benchmark for modeling scam progression from early conversations.<n>We benchmark models on two tasks: real-time termination prediction and scammer action prediction.<n>Results show a clear gap between surface-level fluency and progression modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T15:11:41Z)
• Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text Feedback [49.561885700139676]
  We formalize a multi-turn RL setup, RL from Text Feedback (RLTF), where text feedback is available during training but not at inference.<n>To do this, we propose two methods: Self Distillation (RLTF-SD), which trains the single-turn policy to match its own feedback-conditioned second-turn generations; and Feedback Modeling (RLTF-FM), which predicts the feedback as an auxiliary objective.<n>Our results show that both methods consistently outperform strong baselines across benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:56:56Z)
• Cognitive Chain-of-Thought: Structured Multimodal Reasoning about Social Situations [49.16462809584473]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting helps models think step by step. But what happens when they must see, understand, and judge-all at once?<n>We introduce Cognitive Chain-of-Thought (CoCoT), a prompting strategy that scaffolds VLM reasoning through three cognitively inspired stages: perception, situation, and norm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-27T20:40:30Z)
• PsyScam: A Benchmark for Psychological Techniques in Real-World Scams [38.57446009573742]
  PsyScam is a benchmark designed to systematically capture the psychological techniques employed in real-world scam reports.<n>We show that PsyScam presents significant challenges to existing models in both detecting and generating scam content based on the PTs used by real-world scammers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T01:55:04Z)
• An Explorative Study of Pig Butchering Scams [18.980991664884556]
  We provide the first comprehensive study of pig-butchering scams from multiple vantage points.<n>Our study analyzes the direct victims' narratives shared on multiple social media platforms, public abuse report databases, and case studies from news outlets.<n>In total, we approximated losses of over $521 million related to such scams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T22:15:50Z)
• Conning the Crypto Conman: End-to-End Analysis of Cryptocurrency-based Technical Support Scams [19.802676243375615]
  There is an increase in an emerging fraud trend called cryptocurrency-based technical support scam. We present an analysis apparatus called HoneyTweet to analyze this kind of scam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T09:31:45Z)
• Bandit Social Learning: Exploration under Myopic Behavior [54.767961587919075]
  We study social learning dynamics motivated by reviews on online platforms.<n>Agents collectively follow a simple multi-armed bandit protocol, but each agent acts myopically, without regards to exploration.<n>We derive stark learning failures for any such behavior, and provide matching positive results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T01:57:57Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• Recent trends in Social Engineering Scams and Case study of Gift Card Scam [4.345672405192058]
  Social engineering scams (SES) has been existed since the adoption of the telecommunications by humankind. Recent trends of various social engineering scams targeting the innocent people all over the world. Case study of real-time gift card scam targeting various enterprise organization customers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:17:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.