Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17470v1
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 03:29:49 GMT
- Title: Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice
- Abstract summary: Motivational factors such as self-efficacy and how favorably students feel toward practice play a crucial role in shaping learning.<n>This paper examines the influence of self-efficacy and favorability on learning outcomes across two common practice formats: paper-based and system-based tutoring practice.
- Score: 2.5476463851166007
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Motivational factors such as self-efficacy and how favorably students feel toward practice play a crucial role in shaping learning, particularly in technology-supported environments. Yet, educational interventions often overlook how these factors interact with practice format. This paper examines the influence of self-efficacy and favorability on learning outcomes across two common practice formats: paper-based and system-based tutoring practice. Using a counterbalanced within-subject design with matched problem sets, we isolate the effect of practice format while modeling motivational differences. Results indicate that students with lower baseline self-efficacy achieved greater learning gains regardless of practice format. Among students with lower baseline self-efficacy, greater favorability toward the tutor was associated with greater learning gains during tutor practice, whereas the pattern differed in paper-based practice. Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS)-based practice did not significantly improve post-training self-efficacy relative to paper-based methods. These findings underscore the potential value of tailoring practice format to students' motivational profiles, as the benefits of tutor- and paper-based practice varied with baseline self-efficacy and favorability. They lay the groundwork for future research on how instructional formats can be aligned more effectively with learners' motivational needs.
Related papers
- Exploring the Adoption Intention in Using AI-Enabled Educational Tools Among Preservice Teachers in the Philippines: A Partial-Least Square Modeling [0.1303326183112926]
This study examines the factors influencing pre-service teachers' behavioral intention to use AI-enabled educational tools during their practicum.<n>Data were collected from 563 pre-service teachers using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)<n>Results indicate that performance expectancy and hedonic motivation are the strongest predictors of behavioral intention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T02:56:39Z) - The Effects of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Causal Machine Learning Analysis [0.0]
This study uses double/debiased machine learning (DML) to evaluate the impact of transitioning from lecture-based blended teaching to a flipped classroom concept.<n>Our findings indicate effects on students' self-conception, procrastination, and enjoyment.<n>We do not find significant positive effects on exam scores, passing rates, or knowledge retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T10:36:44Z) - Active Learning Methods for Efficient Data Utilization and Model Performance Enhancement [5.4044723481768235]
This paper gives a detailed overview of Active Learning (AL), which is a strategy in machine learning that helps models achieve better performance using fewer labeled examples.<n>It introduces the basic concepts of AL and discusses how it is used in various fields such as computer vision, natural language processing, transfer learning, and real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T20:42:13Z) - ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verification [53.80183105328448]
Refine via Intrinsic Self-Verification (ReVISE) is an efficient framework that enables LLMs to self-correct their outputs through self-verification.<n>Our experiments on various reasoning tasks demonstrate that ReVISE achieves efficient self-correction and significantly improves reasoning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T13:50:02Z) - Normalization and effective learning rates in reinforcement learning [52.59508428613934]
Normalization layers have recently experienced a renaissance in the deep reinforcement learning and continual learning literature.
We show that normalization brings with it a subtle but important side effect: an equivalence between growth in the norm of the network parameters and decay in the effective learning rate.
We propose to make the learning rate schedule explicit with a simple re- parameterization which we call Normalize-and-Project.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T20:58:01Z) - Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes.
We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function.
Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z) - Improved Performances and Motivation in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Combining Machine Learning and Learner Choice [17.558814050941677]
Large class sizes challenge personalized learning in schools.<n>We present an AI-driven personalization system, called ZPDES.<n>It sequences exercises that maximize learning progress for each student.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T13:41:00Z) - RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning.
Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards.
This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z) - PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system.
The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z) - The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysis [42.20116348668721]
We show that contrastive learning outperforms the standard autoencoders and generative adversarial networks.
We also illustrate the impact of labeled data in supervised contrastive learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-06T03:10:28Z) - RLTutor: Reinforcement Learning Based Adaptive Tutoring System by
Modeling Virtual Student with Fewer Interactions [10.34673089426247]
We propose a framework for optimizing teaching strategies by constructing a virtual model of the student.
Our results can serve as a buffer between theoretical instructional optimization and practical applications in e-learning systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-31T15:42:03Z) - Canvas Adoption Assessment and Acceptance of the Learning Management
System on a Web-Based Platform [0.0]
This study aims to assess student adoption of Canvas as a new learning management system and its potential as a web-based platform in the e-learning programme of the University of the East.
The students perceived ease of use has a significant effect on their perceived usefulness but has no significant effects on their attitude towards the use of Canvas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-29T01:30:55Z) - On Learning Text Style Transfer with Direct Rewards [101.97136885111037]
Lack of parallel corpora makes it impossible to directly train supervised models for the text style transfer task.
We leverage semantic similarity metrics originally used for fine-tuning neural machine translation models.
Our model provides significant gains in both automatic and human evaluation over strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-24T04:30:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.