Children Are Not the Enemy: Child-Fit Security as an Alternative to Bans and Surveillance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17957v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:09:56 GMT
• Title: Children Are Not the Enemy: Child-Fit Security as an Alternative to Bans and Surveillance
• Abstract summary: We argue that this framing is inadequate for children's digital lives and insufficient as a security paradigm.<n>We propose Child-fit security, a design paradigm in which technologies likely to be used by children treat a child as legitimate users, not attackers to be excluded.<n>We conceptualise child-fit security, contrast it with containment-oriented approaches, define its core principles, and discuss its implications for security design.
• Score: 9.395132850398957
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital technologies are now central to children's learning, play, communication, identity formation, and social participation. Yet dominant approaches to children's online safety often rely on containment mechanisms, including bans, age gates, parental controls, monitoring, and screen-time restrictions. These approaches can be useful in specific contexts, but they often frame child protection primarily as a problem of restricting access to systems designed for adults. In this paper, we argue that this framing is inadequate for children's digital lives and insufficient as a security paradigm. We propose Child-fit security, a design paradigm in which technologies likely to be used by children treat a child as legitimate users, not attackers to be excluded, vulnerabilities to be patched, or risks to be managed. In this paradigm, children's wellbeing, development, privacy, safety, agency, and rights become core security requirements. This shifts the focus of protection from apps, accounts, and data to the child-system relationship, which means protecting both the child and their participation. We conceptualise child-fit security, contrast it with containment-oriented approaches, define its core principles, and discuss its implications for security design. We conclude by presenting a research agenda for making child-fit security operational.

Related papers

• A Privacy by Design Framework for Large Language Model-Based Applications for Children [1.3146378832730206]
  Children are increasingly using technologies powered by AI.<n>There are growing concerns about privacy risks particularly for children.<n>This article proposes a framework based on the Privacy-Design (PbD) approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T14:50:52Z)
• A System of Care, Not Control: Co-Designing Online Safety and Wellbeing Solutions with Guardians ad Litem for Youth in Child Welfare [2.5142646517195693]
  We conducted a two-part workshop with 10 Guardians ad Litem (GALs) to explore their perspectives on online safety.<n>Our findings revealed that GALs struggle to support youth with online safety challenges due to limited digital literacy.<n>Gals emphasize developing tools that enable ongoing communication, therapeutic support, and coordination across stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T04:56:26Z)
• Oyster-I: Beyond Refusal -- Constructive Safety Alignment for Responsible Language Models [93.5740266114488]
  Constructive Safety Alignment (CSA) protects against malicious misuse while actively guiding vulnerable users toward safe and helpful results.<n>Oy1 achieves state-of-the-art safety among open models while retaining high general capabilities.<n>We release Oy1, code, and the benchmark to support responsible, user-centered AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T03:04:27Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security [72.83728459135101]
  We develop an approach to address the risk of harms consequential enough to significantly harm humanity.<n>We focus on technical approaches to misuse and misalignment.<n>We briefly outline how these ingredients could be combined to produce safety cases for AGI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:59:31Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• LLMs and Childhood Safety: Identifying Risks and Proposing a Protection Framework for Safe Child-LLM Interaction [8.018569128518187]
  This study examines the growing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in child-centered applications.<n>It highlights safety and ethical concerns such as bias, harmful content, and cultural insensitivity.<n>We propose a protection framework for safe Child-LLM interaction, incorporating metrics for content safety, behavioral ethics, and cultural sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T19:39:48Z)
• A safety risk assessment framework for children's online safety based on a novel safety weakness assessment approach [0.43512163406552007]
  This paper addresses the problem of children's online safety in the context of the growing digital landscape. We propose a safety risk assessment approach that focuses specifically on children's online safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T08:50:15Z)
• Security for Children in the Digital Society -- A Rights-based and Research Ethics Approach [0.0]
  The project is situated in a German context with a focus on European frameworks for the development of Artificial Intelligence and the protection of children from security risks arising in the course of algorithm-mediated online communication. The project develops a children's rights approach to questions of security for children online while also developing a research ethics approach for conducting research with children on online harms such as cybergrooming and sexual violence against children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T08:13:02Z)
• Imagining new futures beyond predictive systems in child welfare: A qualitative study with impacted stakeholders [89.6319385008397]
  We conducted a set of seven design workshops with 35 stakeholders who have been impacted by the child welfare system. We found that participants worried current PRMs perpetuate or exacerbate existing problems in child welfare. Participants suggested new ways to use data and data-driven tools to better support impacted communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T13:49:55Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.