WEQA: Wearable hEalth Question Answering with Query-Adaptive Agentic Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18147v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:45:56 GMT
• Title: WEQA: Wearable hEalth Question Answering with Query-Adaptive Agentic Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We propose WEQA, a query-adaptive agent framework that unifies LLM reasoning with specialized wearable analytical and modeling tools.<n>We also curate a benchmark spanning four open wearable datasets comprising analytic and predictive tasks in three different health domains.<n>Experiments show that our framework is 24% more accurate than LLM and agentic baselines, and a blinded study with 12 medical experts and 8 users shows substantial gains in usefulness and clinical soundness.
• Score: 30.134429515719905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Language models are remarkably capable at medical question answering, in some cases surpassing the accuracy of general physicians. However, answering questions about wearable health data remains challenging and understudied, as these ubiquitous sensors produce continuous, high-dimensional, and longitudinal data, which is non-trivial to align with text-centric distributions in LLM pretraining. The diversity of sensor modalities and user intents cannot be effectively handled by a fixed reasoning workflow or a single pretrained foundation model. To address these challenges, we propose WEQA, a query-adaptive agent framework that unifies LLM reasoning with specialized wearable analytical and modeling tools. An LLM controller is employed to synthesize execution plans and dynamically route each query to the appropriate combination of sensor analysis and pretrained models, and perform grounded response auditing with external knowledge. We also curate a benchmark spanning four open wearable datasets comprising analytic and predictive tasks in three different health domains. Experiments show that our framework is 24% more accurate than LLM and agentic baselines, and a blinded study with 12 medical experts and 8 users shows substantial gains in usefulness and clinical soundness.

Related papers

• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Precision Querying and Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Extraction in Clinical Data Science [3.4325249294405555]
  This study applies Large Language Models (LLMs) to two foundational Electronic Health Record (EHR) data science tasks.<n>We test the ability of LLMs to interact accurately with large structured datasets for analytics.<n>We present a flexible evaluation framework that automatically generates synthetic question and answer pairs tailored to the characteristics of each dataset or task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T14:57:36Z)
• Enhancing the Medical Context-Awareness Ability of LLMs via Multifaceted Self-Refinement Learning [49.559151128219725]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in the medical domain, achieving strong performance on several benchmarks.<n>However, they continue to underperform in real-world medical scenarios, which often demand stronger context-awareness.<n>We propose Multifaceted Self-Refinement (MuSeR), a data-driven approach that enhances LLMs' context-awareness along three key facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T08:13:23Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• LLM Ensemble for RAG: Role of Context Length in Zero-Shot Question Answering for BioASQ Challenge [0.03437656066916039]
  Large language models (LLMs) can be used for information retrieval.<n> ensembles of zero-shot models can accomplish state-of-the-art performance on a domain-specific Yes/No QA task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T13:50:49Z)
• Trustworthy AI Psychotherapy: Multi-Agent LLM Workflow for Counseling and Explainable Mental Disorder Diagnosis [11.025486717604972]
  DSM5AgentFlow is the first LLM-based agent workflow designed to autonomously generate DSM-5 Level-1 diagnostic questionnaires.<n>By simulating therapist-client dialogues with specific client profiles, the framework delivers transparent, step-by-step disorder predictions.<n>This workflow serves as a complementary tool for mental health diagnosis, ensuring adherence to ethical and legal standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T11:08:32Z)
• HealthBranches: Synthesizing Clinically-Grounded Question Answering Datasets via Decision Pathways [12.855316833585908]
  HealthBranches is a novel benchmark dataset for medical Question-Answering (Q&A)<n>This dataset is generated through a semi-automated pipeline that transforms explicit decision pathways from medical source into realistic patient cases with associated questions and answers.<n> Covering 4,063 case studies across 17 healthcare topics, each data point is based on clinically validated reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T11:45:34Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• LLM-MedQA: Enhancing Medical Question Answering through Case Studies in Large Language Models [18.6994780408699]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant challenges in medical question answering.<n>We propose a novel approach incorporating similar case generation within a multi-agent medical question-answering system.<n>Our method capitalizes on the model's inherent medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities, eliminating the need for additional training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T19:55:45Z)
• MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoning [36.400896909161006]
  We develop systems that proactively ask questions to gather more information and respond reliably. We introduce a benchmark - MediQ - to evaluate question-asking ability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T01:32:52Z)
• Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
  Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support* Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit. Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.