Learning from Own Solutions: Self-Conditioned Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18810v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:26:02 GMT
• Title: Learning from Own Solutions: Self-Conditioned Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
• Abstract summary: We propose SC- GRPO (Self-Conditioned GRPO), which uses KL divergence mentioned before as a multiplicative weight on GRPO gradients.<n>Across five benchmarks spanning math, code, and agentic tasks, SC- GRPO consistently outperforms 8.1% over GRPO and 5.9% over DAPO with stronger OOD performance.
• Score: 49.1203423784326
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has driven substantial progress in training LLMs for reasoning tasks, but representative methods such as GRPO assign uniform credit across all tokens, wasting gradient on routine tokens while under-crediting pivotal reasoning steps. Existing token-level credit assignment methods require resources beyond the model's own rollouts. GRPO variants rely on process reward models or ground-truth answers. Knowledge distillation assigns credit through per-token divergence but requires external teachers (On-Policy Distillation) or privileged information (On-Policy Self Distillation). However, these dependencies limit applicability in the pure RLVR setting. We observe that conditioning the model on its own verified trajectories induces a measurable per-token KL divergence between the original and conditioned distributions, and prove that distilling from a self-teacher constructed by verified trajectories leads to infeasible weighted-average solutions when multiple verified trajectories exist. We propose SC-GRPO (Self-Conditioned GRPO), which uses KL divergence mentioned before as a multiplicative weight on GRPO gradients. Across five benchmarks spanning math, code, and agentic tasks, SC-GRPO consistently outperforms 8.1% over GRPO and 5.9% over DAPO with stronger OOD performance. Moreover, SC-GRPO achieves higher performance than OPD.

Related papers

• When Correct Solutions Repeat: Rarity-Aware Credit Redistribution for GRPO [25.979415525596007]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>We formalize this behavior as multiplicity-induced structure-level credit concentration.<n> Cue-GRPO instantiates this rule with- out auxiliary-model inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T11:02:26Z)
• VeriGate: Verifier-Gated Step-Level Supervision for GRPO [51.26100506256885]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization is an effective recipe for training reasoning models with verifier-based outcome rewards.<n>We present VeriGate, a verifier-gated extension of GRPO that addresses these limitations with three design choices.<n>We show that VeriGate improves average accuracy by about 20% and 12% for 1.5B and 7B models respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T18:20:32Z)
• GEAR: Granularity-Adaptive Advantage Reweighting for LLM Agents via Self-Distillation [33.370957547486775]
  Granularity-adaptivE Advantage Reweighting reshapes the trajectory-level GRPO advantage using token- and segment-level signals.<n>GEAR consistently outperforms standard GRPO, self-distillation-only baselines, and token- or turn-level credit-assignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T09:38:38Z)
• Enhancing LLM-based Search Agents via Contribution Weighted Group Relative Policy Optimization [47.7937991619078]
  We propose Contribution-Weighted GRPO, a framework that integrates process supervision into group relative policy optimization.<n>CW-GRPO employs an LLM judge to assess the retrieval utility and reasoning correctness at each search round, producing per-round contribution scores.<n> Experiments on multiple knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that CW-GRPO outperforms standard GRPO by 5.0% on Qwen3-8B and 6.3% on Qwen3-1.7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T17:37:59Z)
• Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoning [63.53679456364683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training has recently driven gains in long chain-of-thought reasoning large language models (LLMs)<n>Most existing knowledge distillation methods are designed for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), relying on fixed teacher traces or teacher-student Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence-based regularization.<n>We propose RL-aware distillation (RLAD), which performs selective imitation during RL -- guiding the student toward the teacher only when it improves the current policy update.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T00:20:39Z)
• Reward and Guidance through Rubrics: Promoting Exploration to Improve Multi-Domain Reasoning [79.365697698062]
  We propose $textbfRGR-GRPO (Reward and Guidance through rubrics), a framework for multi-domain reasoning.<n>RGR-GRPO consistently outperforms RL methods that rely solely on alternative reward schemes or offline guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T20:14:51Z)
• Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards [92.26560379363492]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed as autonomous agents using reinforcement learning (agentic RL)<n>We introduce implicit step rewards for agentic RL (iStar), a general credit-assignment strategy that integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms.<n>We evaluate our method on three challenging agent benchmarks, including WebShop and VisualSokoban, as well as open-ended social interactions with unverifiable rewards in SOTOPIA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T16:15:42Z)
• CAPO: Towards Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Generative Credit Assignment [44.33395106709674]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by using rule-based binary feedback.<n>Current RLVR methods typically assign the same reward to every token.<n>This coarse-grained feedback hampers precise credit assignment, making it hard for models to identify which reasoning steps lead to success or failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T11:06:08Z)
• GRPO-CARE: Consistency-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Reasoning [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark with complex real-world videos requiring balanced perception and reasoning.<n>Using SEED-Bench-R1, we find that standard GRPO, while improving answer accuracy, often reduces logical coherence between reasoning steps and answers, with only a 57.9% consistency rate.<n>We propose GRPO-CARE, a consistency-aware RL framework optimizing both answer correctness and reasoning coherence without explicit supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T08:49:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.