DevOps and General Developers: Insights from Stack Overflow's 2023 Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19395v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 05:54:15 GMT
• Title: DevOps and General Developers: Insights from Stack Overflow's 2023 Survey
• Abstract summary: The research uses a quantitative approach to analyze data from the Stack Overflow 2023 Developer Survey.<n>It focuses on a comparative analysis of technological preferences, demographic information, and professional experiences.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the distinct roles of DevOps specialists and general software developers, examining their varying use of tools, technologies, methodologies, and demographics in the current software development environment. In addition, to differentiate these two professional groups regarding their unique contributions and challenges in the field. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research uses a quantitative approach to analyze data from the Stack Overflow 2023 Developer Survey. It focuses on a comparative analysis of technological preferences, demographic information, and professional experiences between DevOps specialists and general developers, highlighting key trends and differences. The data analysis was conducted using Python's Pandas library for data analysis. Findings: The research indicates no significant difference in the tool and technology preferences between DevOps specialists and general software developers, highlighting their complementary roles. DevOps specialists and general software developers use tools like Docker and Kubernetes, emphasizing efficiency and automation. While general developers employ diverse tools for various role demands, demographic trends show younger general developers and mid-career DevOps professionals. This age range reflects growing experience in DevOps, and both groups are adapting to remote and hybrid work models in the evolving tech industry. Practical Implications: This research offers perspectives on the dynamic roles within software development, emphasizing the growing importance of DevOps. It is a valuable resource for academic and industry professionals to understand the evolving dynamics in software development roles. Originality/Value: This research fills a significant gap in the existing literature regarding the evolving dynamics of software development roles.

Related papers

• How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests [5.6795075579540395]
  This study aims to characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs.<n>We first analyze how differences in merge rates between agentic and human generated PRs vary over time.<n>We then identify the types of development tasks where AI coding agents are predominantly applied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T21:48:28Z)
• On the Road to Personalized Code Intelligence: Portraiting and Assisting Developers Based on Their In-IDE Behaviors [38.53670556517792]
  VirtualME is a novel data infrastructure designed to model the developer by continuously capturing and interpreting their dynamic programming behaviors and preferences.<n>On top of VirtualME, we propose a solution for personalized repository-level knowledge Q&A by integrating the developer persona into the Q&A agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T05:17:08Z)
• DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps Cycle [84.01703913780946]
  Handling the DevOps cycle in real-world software requires analyzing large-scale projects, understanding dynamic program behaviors, leveraging domain-specific tools, and making sequential decisions.<n>We introduce DevOps-Gym, the first end-to-end benchmark for evaluating AI agents across core DevOps tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T18:43:46Z)
• What's in a Software Engineering Job Posting? [4.196805115026664]
  This article explores the non-technical aspects emphasized in Software Engineering job postings.<n>Our Thematic Analysis of 100 job postings shows that employers seek candidates who align with their sense of purpose.<n>By highlighting these expectations, we provide relevant insights for researchers, educators, practitioners, and recruiters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T18:14:15Z)
• A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents [61.474191493322415]
  Code generation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the software development paradigm.<n>LLMs are characterized by three core features.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of the field of LLM-based code generation agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T18:17:36Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• A Web-Based IDE for DevOps Learning in Software Engineering Higher Education [0.0]
  This paper presents an innovative online Integrated Development Environment (IDE) designed to facilitate DevOps learning within university curricula.<n>The devised tool offers a standardized, accessible learning environment, equipped with devcontainers and engaging tutorials.<n>Research findings highlight a marked preference among students for self-paced learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T12:29:08Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
• A Mixed Method Study of DevOps Challenges [2.2957483176038584]
  We conduct an empirical study by applying topic modeling on 174K SO posts that contain DevOps discussions. We then validate and extend the empirical study findings with a survey of 21 professional DevOps practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T05:35:40Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence.<n>It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works.<n>Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.