LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19509v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:49:44 GMT
• Title: LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to structured clinical data.<n>We compare Qwen 2.5 7B and XGBoost on a prediction task via attribution divergence analysis.
• Score: 2.1443570696048906
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to structured clinical data, yet whether they can recognize the limits of their own knowledge on such tasks remains unexplored. We study this question through the lens of cross-model attribution divergence with the goal of reducing epistemic uncertainty for structured tasks, comparing Qwen 2.5 7B and XGBoost on a prediction task via attribution divergence analysis. We report four findings. First, LLM verbalized confidence is epistemically vacuous, it outputs a near-constant (0.856-0.937) regardless of whether accuracy is 49% or 75.3%, tracking prompt format rather than prediction quality. Second, the LLM exhibits an inverse difficulty effect: accuracy drops to 64.8% when XGBoost is 99% correct, but matches XGBoost (73.8% vs. 73.1%) when it is moderately uncertain. Third, few-shot examples and SHAP-derived feature evidence are orthogonal, super-additive interventions: they reduce the Attribution Disagreement Score (ADS) from 1.54 to 0.38 and improve accuracy from 49% to 75.3% without training. Fourth, a cross-model calibrator that determined LLM reliability using attribution divergence signals reduces expected calibration error from 0.254 to 0.080, replacing uninformative verbalized confidence with patient-specific reliability estimates, without accessing model internals or requiring repeated inference. We frame these findings as a cold start problem for LLMs on structured data and outline a path toward genuine epistemic self-awareness.

Related papers

• Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift [46.502741608809174]
  Conformal prediction is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification.<n>Nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model.<n>We show that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T19:34:41Z)
• Bayesian uncertainty estimation improves clinical decision making in medical AI agents [3.251669068529209]
  We show that Monte Carlo dropout provides an uncertainty signal that tracks generalisation across training-set scales and flags confident yet error-prone predictions.<n>In a controlled 2x2 factorial experiment, a clinical-decision-support agent exploited this uncertainty only when it was delivered as a binary error-risk flag rather than as raw scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T11:54:23Z)
• Calibration Without Comprehension: Diagnosing the Limits of Fine-Tuning LLMs for Vulnerability Detection in Systems Software [1.0026496861838445]
  CWE-Trace is a framework for vulnerability detection built from 834 manually curated Linux kernel samples.<n>We evaluate eight vanilla LLMs and 15 LoRA fine-tuned variants across non-targeted detection, targeted detection, and CWE classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T17:19:26Z)
• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• VNDUQE: Information-Theoretic Novelty Detection using Deep Variational Information Bottleneck [4.618615226841302]
  We investigate novelty detection through the Deep Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB)<n>We train VIB models on MNIST with held-out digit classes and evaluate OOD detection using information-theoretic metrics: KL divergence and prediction entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T05:31:44Z)
• Tracing Uncertainty in Language Model "Reasoning" [46.61902399979181]
  Language model (LM) "reasoning", commonly described as Chain-of-Thought or test-time scaling, often improves benchmark performance.<n>We study these dynamics by treating the "reasoning" traces, the intermediate token sequences generated by LMs, as evolving model states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T14:16:37Z)
• Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models [2.064612766965483]
  We show five uncertainty quantification methods on MedGemma 4BIT across in distribution MIMIC CXR and outof distribution PadChest chest X ray datasets, with cross architecture validation on LLaVA RAD7B.<n>For well calibrated single model methods, predictive entropy from one forward pass predicts which samples will flip under rephrasing AUROC 0.711 on MedGemma, 0.878 on LLaVARAD p 10 4, enabling a single entropy threshold to flag both unreliable and sensitive predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T04:18:47Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-turn Medical Diagnosis: Hold, Lure, and Self-Correction [72.89352076103889]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy in medical diagnosis when all clinical information is provided in a single turn.<n>We introduce MINT, a high-fidelity, multi-turn medical diagnosis benchmark comprising 1,035 cases.<n>We uncover three persistent behavioral patterns that significantly impact diagnostic decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T00:23:10Z)
• Fragile Reasoning: A Mechanistic Analysis of LLM Sensitivity to Meaning-Preserving Perturbations [2.7946918847372277]
  Large language models demonstrate strong performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet remain surprisingly fragile to meaning-preserving surface perturbations.<n>We systematically evaluate three open-weight LLMs, Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B, on 677 GSM8K problems paired with semantically equivalent variants.<n>All three models exhibit substantial answer-flip rates (28.8%-45.1%), with number paraphrasing consistently more disruptive than name swaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T05:30:20Z)
• Explainable Admission-Level Predictive Modeling for Prolonged Hospital Stay in Elderly Populations: Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries [65.4286079244589]
  Prolonged length of stay (pLoS) is a significant factor associated with the risk of adverse in-hospital events.<n>We develop and explain a predictive model for pLos using admission-level patient and hospital administrative data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T23:35:24Z)
• Predicting LLM Correctness in Prosthodontics Using Metadata and Hallucination Signals [4.680384065487852]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and medical education.<n>This study investigates the feasibility of predicting correctness by analyzing a general-purpose model (GPT-4o) and a reasoning-centric model (OSS-120B) on a multiple-choice prosthodontics exam.<n>Our findings demonstrate that this metadata-based approach can improve accuracy by up to +7.14% and achieve a precision of 83.12% over a baseline that assumes all answers are correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T07:51:50Z)
• Agent-Based Uncertainty Awareness Improves Automated Radiology Report Labeling with an Open-Source Large Language Model [1.7064514726335305]
  We analyzed 9,683 Hebrew radiology reports from Crohn's disease patients.<n>We incorporated uncertainty-aware prompt ensembles and an agent-based decision model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T16:57:03Z)
• Exploring Response Uncertainty in MLLMs: An Empirical Evaluation under Misleading Scenarios [49.53589774730807]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently achieved state-of-the-art performance on tasks ranging from visual question answering to video understanding.<n>We reveal a response uncertainty phenomenon: twelve state-of-the-art open-source MLLMs overturn a previously correct answer in 65% of cases after receiving a single deceptive cue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T01:11:28Z)
• LLM Robustness Against Misinformation in Biomedical Question Answering [50.98256373698759]
  The retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach is used to reduce the confabulation of large language models (LLMs) for question answering. We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of four LLMs against misinformation in answering biomedical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T16:23:26Z)
• Conservative Prediction via Data-Driven Confidence Minimization [70.93946578046003]
  In safety-critical applications of machine learning, it is often desirable for a model to be conservative. We propose the Data-Driven Confidence Minimization framework, which minimizes confidence on an uncertainty dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:05:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.