Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08941v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 04:18:47 GMT
- Title: Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models
- Abstract summary: We show five uncertainty quantification methods on MedGemma 4BIT across in distribution MIMIC CXR and outof distribution PadChest chest X ray datasets, with cross architecture validation on LLaVA RAD7B.<n>For well calibrated single model methods, predictive entropy from one forward pass predicts which samples will flip under rephrasing AUROC 0.711 on MedGemma, 0.878 on LLaVARAD p 10 4, enabling a single entropy threshold to flag both unreliable and sensitive predictions.
- Score: 2.064612766965483
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Medical Vision Language Models VLMs suffer from two failure modes that threaten safe deployment mis calibrated confidence and sensitivity to question rephrasing. We show they share a common cause, proximity to the decision boundary, by benchmarking five uncertainty quantification methods on MedGemma 4BIT across in distribution MIMIC CXR and outof distribution PadChest chest X ray datasets, with cross architecture validation on LLaVA RAD7B. For well calibrated single model methods, predictive entropy from one forward pass predicts which samples will flip under rephrasing AUROC 0.711 on MedGemma, 0.878 on LLaVARAD p 10 4, enabling a single entropy threshold to flag both unreliable and rephrase sensitive predictions. A five member LoRA ensemble fails under the MIMIC PadChest shift 42.9 ECE, 34.1 accuracy, though LLaVA RAD s ensemble does not collapse 69.1. MC Dropout achieves the best calibration ECE 4.3 and selective prediction coverage 21.5 at 5 risk, yet total entropy from a single forward pass outperforms the ensemble for both error detection AUROC 0.743 vs 0.657 and paraphrase screening. Simple methods win.
Related papers
- Symmetry-Aware Likelihood-Orbit Aggregation for Selective Left-Right Claim Verification [14.108900142001628]
We introduce Relation-Orbit, a closed-form contrast that assigns eight normalized likelihoods to query-supporting and counterfactual roles.<n>On VSR and GQA across four frozen vision-language models, Relation-Orbit yields higher mean test coverage at a 10% selective-risk calibration target.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T11:19:03Z) - LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data [2.1443570696048906]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to structured clinical data.<n>We compare Qwen 2.5 7B and XGBoost on a prediction task via attribution divergence analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T18:49:44Z) - Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection [0.9940728137241215]
Deepfake detection systems achieve near-perfect accuracy on benchmarks, yet forensic deployment demands reliable prediction uncertainty.<n>We propose Correlation-d Fusion (COF), an architecture-adaptive framework that fuses five complementary uncertainty sources.<n>COF requires no model modifications and only 42 s of weight optimization, compared to 20--45 h for a 5-model Deep Ensemble.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T19:28:55Z) - Calibration, Uncertainty Communication, and Deployment Readiness in CKD Risk Prediction: A Framework Evaluation Study [0.0]
Machine learning models for chronic kidney disease often post strong discrimination scores on internal test sets.<n>We trained five classifiers on the UCI CKD dataset (400 patients, 62.5% CKD prevalence)<n>We evaluated each across calibration quality, conformal prediction coverage, and an eight-criterion deployment readiness framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T17:12:48Z) - Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z) - Pedestrian Crossing Intent Prediction via Psychological Features and Transformer Fusion [6.689013818004752]
We present a lightweight, socially informed architecture for pedestrian intention prediction.<n>It fuses four behavioral streams (attention, position, situation, and interaction) using highway encoders, a compact 4-token Transformer, and global self-attention pooling.<n>The proposed approach is modality-agnostic, easy to integrate with vision language pipelines, and suitable for risk-aware intent prediction on resource-constrained platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-20T00:19:34Z) - TRIAGE: Type-Routed Interventions via Aleatoric-Epistemic Gated Estimation in Robotic Manipulation and Adaptive Perception -- Don't Treat All Uncertainty the Same [2.755751829139168]
Most uncertainty-aware robotic systems collapse prediction uncertainty into a single scalar score and use it to trigger uniform corrective responses.<n>This aggregation obscures whether uncertainty arises from corrupted observations or from mismatch between the learned model and the true system dynamics.<n>We introduce a lightweight post hoc framework that decomposes uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components and uses these signals to regulate system responses at inference time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T09:07:43Z) - BadCLIP++: Stealthy and Persistent Backdoors in Multimodal Contrastive Learning [73.46118996284888]
Research on backdoor attacks against multimodal contrastive learning models faces two key challenges: stealthiness and persistence.<n>We propose BadCLIP++, a unified framework that tackles both challenges.<n>For stealthiness, we introduce a semantic-fusion QR micro-trigger that embeds imperceptible patterns near task-relevant regions.<n>For persistence, we stabilize trigger embeddings via radius shrinkage and centroid alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T08:31:16Z) - Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z) - Parrot: Persuasion and Agreement Robustness Rating of Output Truth -- A Sycophancy Robustness Benchmark for LLMs [0.0]
PARROT (Persuasion and Agreement Robustness Rating of Output Truth) is a robustness focused framework designed to measure the degradation in accuracy under social pressure exerted on users.<n>We evaluate 22 models using 1,302 MMLU-style multiple-choice questions across 13 domains and domain-specific authority templates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T13:01:28Z) - Transparent Early ICU Mortality Prediction with Clinical Transformer and Per-Case Modality Attribution [42.85462513661566]
We present a lightweight, transparent multimodal ensemble that fuses physiological time-series measurements with unstructured clinical notes from the first 48 hours of an ICU stay.<n>A logistic regression model combines predictions from two modality-specific models: a bidirectional LSTM for vitals and a finetuned ClinicalModernBERT transformer for notes.<n>On the MIMIC-III benchmark, our late-fusion ensemble improves discrimination over the best single model while maintaining well-calibrated predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-19T20:11:49Z) - ObjexMT: Objective Extraction and Metacognitive Calibration for LLM-as-a-Judge under Multi-Turn Jailbreaks [12.396822247035578]
We present exMT, a benchmark for objective extraction and metacognition.<n>Given a multi-turn transcript, a model must output a one-sentence base objective and a self-reported confidence.<n> Accuracy is scored by similarity to gold objectives, then thresholded once on 300 calibration items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-23T03:32:04Z) - MedOmni-45°: A Safety-Performance Benchmark for Reasoning-Oriented LLMs in Medicine [69.08855631283829]
We introduce Med Omni-45 Degrees, a benchmark designed to quantify safety-performance trade-offs under manipulative hint conditions.<n>It contains 1,804 reasoning-focused medical questions across six specialties and three task types, including 500 from MedMCQA.<n>Results show a consistent safety-performance trade-off, with no model surpassing the diagonal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T08:38:16Z) - Probabilistic Soundness Guarantees in LLM Reasoning Chains [37.440902632372904]
Autoregressive Reasoning Entailment Stability (ARES) is a probabilistic framework that evaluates each reasoning step based solely on previously-verified premises.<n>ARES achieves state-of-the-art performance across four benchmarks and demonstrates superior robustness on very long synthetic reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T09:40:56Z) - CorBenchX: Large-Scale Chest X-Ray Error Dataset and Vision-Language Model Benchmark for Report Error Correction [11.731590131260424]
CorBenchX is a suite for automated error detection and correction in chest X-ray reports.<n>We first synthesize a large-scale dataset of 26,326 chest X-ray error reports.<n>We benchmark both open- and closed-source vision-language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T15:39:39Z) - Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance Reduction [56.360865951192324]
When fine-tuning zero-shot models, our desideratum is for the fine-tuned model to excel in both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD)
We propose a sample-wise ensembling technique that can simultaneously attain the best ID and OOD accuracy without the trade-offs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T13:13:39Z) - CRTRE: Causal Rule Generation with Target Trial Emulation Framework [47.2836994469923]
We introduce a novel method called causal rule generation with target trial emulation framework (CRTRE)
CRTRE applies randomize trial design principles to estimate the causal effect of association rules.
We then incorporate such association rules for the downstream applications such as prediction of disease onsets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-10T02:40:06Z) - RULSurv: A probabilistic survival-based method for early censoring-aware prediction of remaining useful life in ball bearings [39.58317527488534]
We introduce a novel and flexible method for early fault detection using Kullback-Leibler divergence and RUL estimation.<n>We demonstrate our approach in the XJTU-SY dataset using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy across three different operating conditions.<n>Our approach achieves a mean cumulative relative accuracy (CRA) of 0.7586 over 5 bearings under the highest load, which improves over several state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T16:17:29Z) - Conservative Prediction via Data-Driven Confidence Minimization [70.93946578046003]
In safety-critical applications of machine learning, it is often desirable for a model to be conservative.
We propose the Data-Driven Confidence Minimization framework, which minimizes confidence on an uncertainty dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T07:05:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.